small lcd monitors for coding quotation

Programming often requires you to multitask with a ton of windows open, and if that"s what you need, you"ll want a big monitor to open all your windows at once. While high-resolution monitors are a great choice for that as you can view more of your text at once with sharp clarity, there are also large ultrawide monitors available if you prefer something with more horizontal screen space. Don"t only consider the size as you also want to look for other things in a monitor like good ergonomics, wide viewing angles, and a USB hub if you connect external devices.

We"ve bought and tested more than 260 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best monitors to purchase for programmers. Also, make sure to check out our recommendations for the best ultrawide monitors, the best monitors for dual setup, and the best office monitors.

The best programming monitor we"ve tested is the LG 38WN95C-W. It"s a great overall display that"s versatile for different uses, and it offers very good performance for work. It has a large 38-inch screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio, which is great for programming because you can easily open multiple windows at once and multitask without having to open and close windows. It has a unique 3840x1600 resolution which results in good text clarity. If you want even better text clarity, the LG 40WP95C-W is a similar display with a 5120x2160 resolution, so text is extremely sharp, but it also costs a lot more for features you don"t necessarily need for programming, like accurate colors.

If you"re looking for something a bit cheaper in the upper mid-range price category or aren"t a fan of the ultrawide format of the LG 38WN95C-W, check out the Dell U3223QE. It"s also an impressive work monitor with a large 32-inch screen and 4k resolution, so while it doesn"t offer as much screen space as the LG, it has improved pixel density for sharper text clarity. It means that you can easily read your coding text and view more lines at once, and the screen is big enough for multitasking with various windows open.

It has extra features to improve your workflow, like a massive USB hub with three USB-C ports and five USB-A ports. It supports DisplayPort Alt Mode if you want to connect a laptop, and it has a KVM switch that makes it easy to use the same keyboard and mouse if you have two devices connected to the monitor. If you find the 32-inch screen too big, you can also find the Dell U2723QE, which has a 27-inch screen and costs a lot less for similar performance, and it"s a better option if you"re looking for something in the mid-range price category.

If you find the Dell U3223QE too expensive, there are good options that are cheaper in the lower mid-range price category, like the Dell S2722QC. It"s a step down from the U3223QE in terms of features because it has a smaller USB hub with a single USB-C port and two USB-A ports, and it doesn"t have a KVM switch, so it isn"t as good for multitasking, but that"s what you have to expect for getting something cheaper. Still, it offers the same 4k resolution with fantastic text clarity, and although the screen is smaller, you can easily open two windows side-by-side.

It"s a great choice to use in well-lit rooms because it gets bright enough to fight glare, and the reflection handling is also very good, even better than the U3223QE, meaning you won"t have issues using it with some lights around. Luckily, it has wide viewing angles that make the image remain consistent from the sides, and with excellent ergonomics, it"s easy to adjust the screen and share it with someone else if you need your coworker to look over your coding.

If you"re looking for the best programming monitor on a budget, the Dell S2721QS is a good alternative. While it has the same 27-inch, 4k screen as the Dell S2722QC, it"s cheaper because it"s rather basic in features, but it"s still a great choice for a budget model and delivers sharper text than other similarly-priced monitors. The incredible text clarity makes it easy to see more of your work at once, and the screen is big enough to multitask. If you aren"t a fan of 4k screens and prefer a 1440p resolution, the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV is a good alternative and has more USB ports, but text doesn"t look as sharp.

It"s great for sharing your screen with coworkers as it has wide viewing angles, and the stand offers impressive ergonomics, making it easy to adjust to an ideal viewing position. It"s also a great choice for well-lit rooms as it gets bright enough to fight glare, and the reflection handling is very good.

If you want a cheap entry-level monitor that won"t take up a lot of space, then the ASUS VG246H is a good option. With a smaller 24-inch screen and lower 1080p resolution than the Dell S2721QS, it"s better to use it as a secondary display next to your main one, or it"s also a good choice to use two next to each other for more screen space. Still, the text clarity is decent, and the picture quality is good thanks to its good reflection handling and decent SDR peak brightness, meaning you won"t have problems with it in a bright room.

It"s pretty barebones in terms of features, which is what you have to expect for a cheaper monitor. Despite its low cost, it has remarkable ergonomics that make it easy to adjust the screen to your liking, and with wide viewing angles, the images look the same when viewing directly from directly in front or from the sides. It also has a flicker-free backlight that helps reduce eye strain during long work sessions.

The Gigabyte M34WQ is an ultrawide monitor like the LG 38WN95C-W with a smaller 34-inch screen and 3440x1440 resolution, so it"s a good choice if you want something cheaper, but if you want the best monitor for developers with a wide screen, go for the LG.

The Dell S3221QS is larger than the Dell S2721QS, which is good if you want the extra screen space, but it also costs more and has worse ergonomics, so the S2721QS provides the best overall performance.

Replaced the Gigabyte M34WQ and the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV with the Dell U3223QE and the Dell S2721QS because they"re each better aligned with user needs for programming; renamed the Dell S2722QC to the "Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor"; updated the Notable Mentions based on changes.

Restructured article to reflect how programmers are looking for monitors; removed the Gigabyte M32UC, Dell S3422DWG, Dell S3221QS, Dell S2722DGM, and the Lenovo D27-30; added the LG 38WN95C-W, Gigabyte M34WQ, Dell S2722QC, ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV, and the ASUS VG246H because they"re all better-suited for productivity; updated Notable Mentions based on changes.

Restructured article to reflect user needs for programming in the dark; Removed the Dell U2723QE, Dell S2722QC, Dell S2721QS, and the Dell C1422H because they all have a low contrast ratio; renamed the Gigabyte M32UC as the "Best Monitor For Programming"; replaced the Gigabyte M34WQ with the Dell S3422DWG and renamed to "Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor"; added the Dell S2722DGM and the Lenovo D27-30 to their respective categories; updated Notable Mentions based on changes.

Moved the Dell U2723QE to "Best Monitor" and moved the Dell S3221QS to "Best Mid-Range"; replaced the Samsung Odyssey G3 with the Dell S2721QS because it has a higher resolution; added the Dell S2722QC as "Best For Bright Rooms"; added the Apple Studio Display to Notable Mentions.

Complete restructuring to reflect user needs; replaced the Dell S2722QC with the Dell S3221QS, the ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE with the Dell C1422H, and the Gigabyte G27Q with the Samsung Odyssey G3 because they"re all better in dark rooms. Replaced the Gigabyte M32U with the Gigabyte M32UC and renamed to "Best For Gaming"; removed the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD; added the Dell U2723QE as the "Best For Mac".

Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors for coding and programming that are currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people, in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.

If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.

Programming is possible on nearly any monitor, but most programmers prefer a big, pixel-dense, attractive screen that can render tiny code with clarity and display numerous windows at once. Prolific multi-taskers, many programmers also go all-in on multiple displays and use two or three monitors at once.

This is a 34-inch ultrawide monitor with a resolution of 3440×1440, which provides plenty of display space and pixel density for viewing multiple windows or large amounts of code. It also has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alternate Mode and 90 watts of Power Delivery. That’s great for easily docking a USB-C-compatible laptop.

Though ideal for programming, the ProArt PG348CGV excels in any task thrown at it. It has accurate color and a wide color gamut, so it’s great for photo, video, and graphics editing. The monitor also has a 120Hz refresh rate and supports AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, which makes it a solid choice for gaming.

Its price seals the deal. Available for $749.99, the ProArt PG348CGV is less expensive than similar competitors. In fact, it overdelivers compared to most alternatives: Many ultrawide monitors offer similar image quality, a high refresh rate, or USB-C, but very few offer all three.

The U3223QE is a 32-inch widescreen monitor with 4K resolution. It offers a large, pixel-dense display that’s great for using four windows in a grid arrangement. The monitor’s high pixel density and strong brightness make code easy to read even when individual windows are small.

Its size and resolution are supported by excellent image quality. This is among the few monitors with an IPS Black panel, which roughly doubles the contrast ratio of a standard IPS panel. The result is a richer, more pleasant image. It also has excellent color accuracy, so it’s great for photo, video, and graphics editing.

The U3223QE is also among the best USB-C monitors available. When connected over USB-C it acts as a feature-rich USB-C hub with multiple USB-A ports, ethernet, audio-out, and DisplayPort-out. It’s perfect for programmers who need to dock a laptop over USB-C.

This monitor is a 27-inch widescreen with 4K resolution, offering a reasonably sized and pixel-dense space for viewing multiple windows at once. Its pixel density, which works out to 163 pixels per inch, is as high as you’ll find without upgrading to a more extravagant (and much more expensive) option such as a 5K or 8K display. Image quality is excellent, too, with top-notch color accuracy.

This is a USB-C monitor with 65 watts of Power Delivery and four USB-A ports. Its Power Delivery won’t be enough for high-end laptops but remains adequate for more portable machines, and its USB-A port selection is great for the price.

The AOC CU34G2X is a 34-inch curved ultrawide monitor with a resolution of 3440×1440. Its size and resolution are the same as our top pick, the Asus ProArt PA348CGV, so it’s just as useful for programming and multi-tasking.

This monitor uses a VA panel that provides an advantage in contrast ratio and black levels. Its color accuracy and color gamut, though not as good as more expensive alternatives, are more than acceptable in day-to-day use. This monitor supports a 144Hz refresh rate and adaptive sync, making it a solid choice for gaming after the workday is done.

Priced at $399.99 (and often available for less), the CU34G2X is more affordable than most alternatives. This does result in a few sacrifices. It’s not especially bright, so it’s best used in a room with some light control. It also lacks the wide color gamut and great color accuracy found in the ProArt PA348CGV. With that said, its overall image quality is solid and won’t distract from programming.

Programmers often want to use a second monitor—not just for viewing code, but also for managing the wide variety of extra programs (like Slack or Monday) that programmers must use to keep organized and connected. The LG DualUp 28MQ780-B is uniquely suited for this task.

The DualUp 28MQ780-B is a 28-inch monitor with an unusual 16:18 aspect ratio that’s a bit taller than it is wide. It can also rotate 90 degrees, if you’d prefer, to become a bit wider than it is tall. Either way, the monitor is close to square and about as tall as a 32-inch monitor. It also ships with a monitor arm, instead of a desktop stand, which is handy for positioning the monitor next to another display.

Programmers will be pleased with the monitor’s 2560×2880 resolution, which is higher than a 1440p monitor but slightly less than a 4K monitor. The monitor has great image quality with high color accuracy and a wide color gamut. It’s a USB-C monitor, too, providing up to 90 watts of Power Delivery for charging a connected laptop.

A larger monitor is often better for programming than a smaller one. This includes ultrawide monitors. A larger monitor effectively increases the size of everything on-screen, which in turn can make it easier to see. We think a 27-inch widescreen monitor is a comfortable minimum size to aim for, and all the monitors on this list are at least that large.

There are limits to size, though: A 48-inch display can be uncomfortable to use because it will lack pixel density and may require a lot of head and neck movement to see the corners of the screen.

A higher resolution provides more useable display space because it increases the number of pixels visible. If comparing a 1080p monitor to a 4K monitor, for example, the 4K monitor can literally display four times as many pixels.

Those pixels will also be easier to view and use because a higher resolution improves sharpness. Programmers will find a high-resolution monitor can maintain clarity in extremely small fonts. That’s great when viewing large chunks of code.

A wide range of connectivity, including USB-C, can be useful for programmers. That’s epically true for programmers who use a laptop and frequently dock/undock the laptop throughout the workday.

A USB-C connection can carry video over DisplayPort Alternate Mode and charge a connected laptop with Power Delivery. That makes it a one-cable solution for docking the laptop. Just plug it in and you’re good to go. In many cases, the USB-C monitor will even function as a USB-C hub.

Programing doesn’t require a monitor with good, or even modest, image quality. Functionally, most tasks core to programming would work just as well on a 20-year-old LCD as on a modern display.

However, most programmers find themselves working with or viewing various forms of media occasionally, whether it’s image files for UI elements or textures for a game. This is where superior image quality becomes useful. It will help programmers get a better idea of what the result looks like on a typical user’s display.

We use a SpyderXElite color calibration tool to measure the brightness, contrast, color gamut, and accuracy of each monitor. This tool, which can measure quality objectively, lets us directly compare hundreds of monitors.

Programmers need a lot of raw display space, and that display space needs to be as useful as possible. That means larger, more pixel-dense monitors are better for programming than smaller, less pixel-dense displays.

That’s not to say programmers can’t use smaller displays, and not all programmers have the same workflow. Some only need to view code from a single source at once, while others may have several open windows showing code from different programs, or different portions of the same program.

Programming often requires multi-tasking, which can result in a lot of open windows. A large display is helpful, but the display also needs to be pixel dense, as this helps ensure that small text and interface elements are readable.

With that said, 1440p resolution is often just fine for programming. This resolution may look a bit rough when viewing very, very small font sizes, but that’s a less common use case. 1440p looks sharp in typical use.

Ultrawide monitors provide more display space than a similarly sized widescreen monitor. A 34-inch ultrawide monitor, for example, is the same height as a 27-inch widescreen but provides 25 percent more overall display space. That’s great when viewing two, three, or four windows at once.

There is a trade-off, however: Most ultrawide monitors don’t support 4K resolution but are instead equivalent to 1440p resolution. There are exceptions, such as the LG 40WP95C-W, but they’re very expensive and not worth the price premium in most situations.

The best monitors for programming will make coding your creative projects all the more comfortable. You might think that any display would do for this, after all, you don"t need any special features when you"re just looking at syntax, variables, and data structures all day. However, much like how an ergonomic and comfortable keyboard can make a huge difference in your typing experience, having the ideal programming monitor can also drastically improve your workflow.

In fact, there are several things to consider when choosing the best monitor for programming. Your top considerations must be the screen size, aspect ratio, and orientation. While such displays aren"t your only options, those that have a larger aspect ratio or a portrait mode will serve you better as they are better at displaying long sections of code. If that isn"t an option for you, you must get one with multitasking features like Picture-by-Picture.

If you"re using one of the best laptops for programming, you might need USB-C connectivity as well. Since you’ll be staring at that display for hours, flicker-free technology and blue light filters that minimise eye strain are also features you’ll want. And, don"t forget to consider colour accuracy and colour coverage if your projects include images and video.

To help you choose the best monitor for programming, we’ve applied our expertise and gathered the most ideal displays we"ve used, tested, or fully reviewed, keeping in mind different needs and budgets. For more about how we rate and review monitors, see our how we test page.

The LG UltraFine Display 32UL950’s steep price tag might be tough to swallow, especially if you’re only starting out as a programmer, but it"s a superb screen that features 600 nits of brightness, HDR600 support, and 98% DCI-P3 colour coverage. It’s a pleasure to not just code on, but also for playing a PC game or for viewing films.

At 32 inches, this display is large enough that you won"t be squinting at your text code and you have enough room for viewing multiple windows side-by-side. An elegant design with minimal bezels adds to the sense of an immersive workflow, while Thunderbolt 3 connectivity allows for data transfer speeds of 40GB per second.

If you"re new to programming or still studying, then you"ll probably want a monitor for programming that"s kinder on your bank account, but ideally without sacrificing quality. Fortunately, there are a few good affordable options out there, including the VP2458 Professional from ViewSonic. At under $300/£300, it falls within everyone’s budget, but it still offers some attractive features for programmers.

It comes with the kind of blue light filter offered by pricier monitors so you can reduce eyestrain even if you’re on an all-nighter to make a deadline. It also delivers lifelike colours with its 100% sRGB coverage and quick and easy colour calibration. The 24in panel makes it a good size to fit in a dorm or small apartment setup while an adjustable setup allows you to work in the best posture even if you’re in a tight space. On top of that, the near-frameless design offers a seamless visual experience when using multi-monitor setups if you want to go down that avenue.

The BenQ EX3203R is primarily aimed at gamers, but when we reviewed the screen, we found it to be ideal for general productivity work too. We think it"s a brilliant monitor for programming too thanks to its high resolution and large screen size. So if you"re both a coder and a keen gamer, this is an option that"s well worth considering. It boasts 1440p resolution, which is ideal for coding as it gives you more pixels to work with than a 1080p monitor, but doesn"t go overboard like a 4K monitor.

The Dell UltraSharp U3223QZ is made specifically for productivity and multitasking. That means that it comes loaded with multitasking features that programmers will certainly appreciate, including auto KVM (Keyboard, Mouse, Video), Picture-by-Picture (PbP) and Picture-in-Picture (PiP), and the ability to daisy chain two 4K monitors. Several highly accurate creative colour modes are on hand as well for your projects that might involve graphics, images, or videos. All those should make up for the lack of portrait mode.

As we now live in a world where working from home or remotely is the norm, its best feature is that built-in intelligent webcam that delivers up to 4K at 30 fps or 1080p at 60fps video and comes with a SafeShutter feature. That should effortlessly connect you with clients, project managers, and other colleagues whether you"re based at home full-time or following a hybrid model.

We honestly don"t know why there aren"t more 16:18 monitors for coders, writers, and other multitaskers. Even though we haven"t done a full review of the LG DualUp Monitor 28MQ780, LG"s latest offering with a 16:18 aspect ratio and a fully articulating mount and stand, it only took us a couple of hours of use to be fully convinced of its brilliance.

Touting a squarish format, this 2560 x 2880 monitor is always wide enough to display what you need from every open window, regardless of whether it"s in landscape or portrait mode. It also helps you organise those windows by allowing you to snap them up into a stack of two or three, brilliantly making them effortlessly accessible and showing more than enough content.

We"ve already included an ultrawide monitor in the list, but one that sits at the lower end of the definition and is suitable for more desk types. The Samsung CRG9 sits at the other end, offering a huge 49-inch screen, with a 32:9 ratio. It"s a huge amount of workspace, which means you can have all your apps, websites and more open at once. And thanks to multiple inputs and picture-in-picture mode, you can hook up two devices and use them together on the same monitor, making for a more space-efficient option than using multiple monitors.

The BenQ EW3280U may be from the manufacturer"s entertainment series and designed specifically for multimedia consumption, but we found that it makes for an excellent productivity monitor. The price is great for budget-conscious coders, and features like its light sensors that detect ambient light and optimizes brightness and colour temperature accordingly are brilliant for your eyes.

Huawei’s spiffy offering, the Huawei MateView, is undeniably sleek and brilliantly designed. For example, it keeps its super neat, incredibly thin design while still offering an impressive selection of ports by utilising its stand. Just as impressive are its specs that include 100% sRGB and 98% DCI-P3 colour coverage, up to DeltaE<1 colour accuracy, 500 nits of brightness, and HDR 400. Of course, being a USB-C monitor, it also boasts a USB-C port that supports data and video transfer as well as up to 65W Power Delivery.

Another huge 49in ultrawide option is the Philips Brilliance 499P9H. Like the Samsung monitor above, this also offers a more streamlined alternative to working with multiple monitors. With all that screen real estate you"re getting, you can spread out as much as you can, which in turn saves you time and allows you to focus on your work.

True to its multi-tasking nature, it also boasts a built-in USB-C docking station, a built-in KVM switch to easily switch between sources, and power delivery up to 65W, allowing you to power and charge your notebook via USB-C. Stock is low in the US at the moment. This award-winning monitor for programming isn"t cheap, however, so only invest if the whole package is worth it to you.

There are some important considerations to bear in mind when buying a monitor for coding. Firstly, there"s the matter of size. You"ll want a screen that is large enough that you"re not forced to strain to see, but not so big that you feel uneasy working on it. A huge monitor that looms over you can be uncomfortable, although that can be remedied with curved screens, which avoid you having to strain your neck to see all parts of the screen.

Another important factor is resolution. The higher the resolution, the more room you have to work, and text can look sharper too. However, ultra-high resolutions can leave text looking very small, which again is uncomfortable, although on both macOS and Windows 10, you can tweak the scaling of text so that it"s more comfortable to read on high-resolution monitors.

Ergonomics are important too. The best monitors for programming are easily adjustable, offering a good range of movement. You might also like a monitor that can be rotated to portrait orientation. Other features to look out for include blue light filtering and flicker reduction, which help take the strain off your eyes. Some monitors also offer automatic brightness adjustment, which fine-tunes the display to suit the ambient light of your setting, again helping to avoid eyestrain. It might also be worth looking at the best monitor stands to ensure you get your setup just right.Are 4K monitors suitable for programming?When you’re coding, a monitor’s resolution will not factor in quite the way it would with other content creators. Having access to stunning graphics, at least for work, doesn’t hold the same priority as being able to work in comfort. However, that doesn’t mean you should ignore UHD monitors when looking for that next display.

UHD displays do offer one particular benefit to coders over their lower-res counterparts. That higher resolution provides more screen real estate and allows you to fit more windows on your screen while working. If anything, that higher resolution allows a more streamlined workflow.How big should my monitor be for programming?A display’s size depends largely on how you work and what your setup is like. If you plan on sitting further back, you’ll want to use a larger monitor so you can see everything clearly. But, if you work in more cramped quarters, you’ll want to have the entire display within your field of vision. And, that means downsizing. Otherwise, you’ll end up moving your eyes and neck to the point of discomfort.Is a curved screen good for programming?Choosing between a flat or curved panel is mostly a matter of preference. Flat panels lend themselves much better to multi-display setups, with some of them can rotate 90 degrees to use in portrait mode.

If you’re planning on sitting a little closer to your monitor, a curved monitor might be better, especially if you don’t plan on adding a second panel. The curvature gives you a more immersive viewing experience, letting you see the corners of the screen without having to refocus on different parts of the screen. That curved design will also alleviate eye fatigue and strain.Why do coders use vertical monitors?When you use a vertical monitor, you’re able to read and skim through much larger portions of your work at once. Since lines of code don’t get very long, the width of a monitor doesn’t come into play when writing or reading through your code the way it does for photo or video editing work. So, turning a monitor into portrait mode makes the best use of your screen space. Of course, you’ll want to pair that with a monitor in landscape mode to see the results.

A monitor is key. You’ll use it hour after hour, day after day, year after year. Monitors even have the audacity to resist obsolescence, so the monitor you buy today might be the one you’re still using in a decade. (My editor and I both have decade-old Dell U2412 monitors that are still going strong.)

It’s an important decision, but not a difficult one, as there are dozens of great monitors to choose from. This guide will help you pick the best for your home office.

I’ve reviewed monitors and laptop displays for over a decade. While different monitors suit different owners, I believe the idealhome office monitor has a 27-inch screen and 4K resolution. It uses an IPS panel, reaches a brightness of at least 250 nits, and can display 99 percent of the sRGB color gamut. Around back you’ll find a USB-C port that can deliver enough power to charge a laptop, along with HDMI and DisplayPort, plus an ergonomic stand that can adjust for height and attaches to a VESA mount.

Finding a monitor that ticks most of these boxes won’t be too difficult. LG’s UltraFine line, Dell’s USB-C hub monitors, BenQ’s PD2720U and PD2725U, and HP’s U28 can check them all. Only the price may be higher than you hope; snagging any of the above will cost at least $450.

But like I said, different monitors suit different owners. These monitors are ideal for work, but they’re expensive. They also lack features you’ll crave when it’s time to clock out and fire up a round of Valorant. This guide will help you navigate the monitor world’s many caveats and find one that’s a fit for you.

Most standard-width monitors come in one of three sizes: 24-inch, 27-inch, and 32-inch. Bigger is not necessarily better. A large display may look more impressive, but I find it uncomfortable when placed close to my eyes. There are also practical considerations like perceived pixel density. A big monitor will look fuzzier than a smaller monitor of the same resolution unless you move it further away — which isn’t always an option.

That’s why a 27-inch monitor is my go-to recommendation. It’s large enough to look impressive on a typical home office desk but isn’t excessive. In my experience, 32-inch monitors should be reserved for unusually large and deep desks, or corner setups where it’s possible to position the display around four feet away from your face. This is especially true for 32-inch monitors with a resolution below 4K, which look grainy to me at a distance of three feet.

For the same reasons, 24-inch monitors work better if you have a small, slim desk (say, around 24 inches deep or less) or otherwise bring the monitor closer to your face. A 24-inch monitor may sound small, but it’ll look reasonably large because it’s so close. They’re also a great way to save money. You can buy a decent all-around monitor like the HP 24mh for less than $200. It won’t wow you, but it works in a pinch.

You can be creative with size if you mount a VESA-compatible monitor to an arm, as this will let you move it to your preference (including the proper ergonomic height). If you’re just doing it to move a large monitor farther away, though, give it a second thought. Why spend more for a larger monitor, and a monitor arm to position it farther away, instead of buying a smaller display to start?

If you’re looking to stretch more screen across your field of view for multitasking, you might consider an ultrawide monitor instead. There, I think the choice is clear: go for a 34-incher.

Smaller models lack vertical space. A 29-inch ultrawide has less vertical display space than a 24-inch widescreen. Larger models generally have the opposite problem. Many are too big for a typical home office desk, not only because of their screen size, but because of the large stands used to stabilize them (some are several feet wide). You might need to rearrange your desk around a 38-inch or 43-inch monitor or add a top-tier monitor arm to make it work.

What about super-ultrawides, like the 49-inch Samsung Odyssey G9 series? These monitors can offer a commanding view and are a good alternative to a double or triple monitor setup but, like big ultrawides, you’ll need to build your setup around it.

Resolution is key. A higher resolution means more pixels, and more pixels means a sharper, crisper image. More pixels also adds flexibility. You can use scaling features in Windows and MacOS to increase content size for readability, or crank it down to show more content at once.

4K resolution (3,840 x 2,160) looks fantastic and is widely available on 27-inch and 32-inch displays. It’s not that expensive, either. Budget 4K 27-inch monitors like the Dell S2721QS can get you 4K for $350 or less.

With that said, settling for 1440p (2,560 x 1,440) can save money. It’s a bit disappointing on a 32-inch display, unless you move it far away, but it’s workable. A 27-inch 1440p display can look reasonably sharp and is a good choice if you personally don’t care about having the sharpest picture possible.

You should probably avoid 1080p (1,920 x 1,080) in a 27-inch or 32-inch monitor, however. It will look grainy and pixelated. Small fonts and interface elements (such as buttons) can become difficult to see.

Twenty-four-inch monitors are a different story; 4K is rare, and 1440p is often the premium option. In fact, most monitors of this size are 1080p. It’s not ideal but it’s acceptable, as decreasing size increases pixel density. A 24-inch 1080p monitor is noticeably sharper than a 27-inch 1080p monitor.

Want a 34-inch ultrawide? Look for 3,440 x 1,440 resolution. This leads to a pixel density nearly identical to a 27-inch 1440p monitor (about 109 pixels per inch). A handful of super-budget ultrawides use 2,560 x 1,080 resolution which, like 1080p on a large monitor, isn’t pleasant. LG’s 5K Ultrawide line is the sole option if you want 4K-equivalent pixel density in a 34-inch ultrawide, but you’ll typically pay $1,500 or more. LG’s well-reviewed 38-inch with 3,840 x 1,600 resolution costs even more at $1,600 and, though it might offer more screen, is equal in pixel density to a 3,440 x 1,440 ultrawide.

Most monitors have HDMI and DisplayPort. There’s no great reason to prefer one over the other for remote work. The huge majority of monitors sold today offer both, so the port you use will likely come down to what’s available on your PC.

What about HDMI 2.1? It’s not necessary for remote work, and productivity monitors with HDMI 2.1 aren’t yet a thing. Be warned that HDMI 2.1 could get messy in 2022 due to the standard’s lax certification. It’s key only if you want to connect a PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X game console.

If you’ve got extra cash to spend, the galaxy-brain move is to ignore HDMI and DisplayPort entirely and leap to USB-C and/or Thunderbolt. USB-C and Thunderbolt are great because they allow a single-cable solution for modern laptops that support the standard. You can plug in the laptop and charge it from the monitor while sending video to the monitor simultaneously. The best USB-C monitors even act as a hub with multiple extra ports like USB-A, USB-C, and ethernet.

Just make sure you check the fine print. Look for USB-C with DisplayPort Alternate Mode and Power Delivery, or Thunderbolt with Power Delivery (the standard has DisplayPort baked in). Those sorts of USB-C ports aren’t exactly uncommon on laptops: even the modest ThinkPad E545 I bought a few years back includes them.

But you’ll also need to make sure the monitor you buy provides enough electricity. Power Delivery currently maxes out at 100 watts, so even the most powerful monitors can’t fully power laptops like a top-spec Razer Blade or high-end MacBook Pro 16, but a monitor that delivers 60 watts or even 45 watts might be enough if you have a thin-and-light laptop like a Dell XPS 13 or MacBook Air. The higher the better, but if the USB-C monitor doesn’t deliver as much power as your laptop’s power brick, your battery might only charge when it’s idle or even powered off.

USB-C monitors are also expensive. The benefits often add several hundred dollars to the price when compared to an otherwise similar monitor that lacks USB-C. It’s worth the money, though: in 2019, I purchased a Viewsonic VG2455-2K for a sweet one-cable connection to USB-C capable laptops, and find it ideal for swiftly connecting my laptop to a larger screen.

Any monitor worth your attention will have a stand that at least adjusts for height, usually along a range from 100 to 150 millimeters. Sure, you can stack it on books or buy a plastic riser, but that’s added hassle and clutter.

Many monitors also adjust for tilt and swivel, and some pivot 90 degrees into portrait orientation. That can be particularly handy when a monitor is used as a second display. For example, you could swivel a monitor to directly face you while doing detailed work, like editing a photo, and swing it away when it’s just displaying Slack or Discord. Tilt is similar but on the vertical axis, and especially handy if you have a standing desk, as you may need to tilt the monitor up while the desk is standing.

But if your monitor doesn’t have enough range of motion, or you want to free up space on your desk, you could instead add a VESA-compatible monitor arm to get it off the ground. Look for monitors with a 100mm x 100mm VESA spacing pattern. This is an extremely common feature found in all but the most affordable monitors, and you only need to worry about the 100mm spacing pattern. Others exist, but are relevant to other types of displays (like televisions).

A monitor arm is rarely a necessity, but it’s great for multi-monitor setups that place secondary displays around and above your main monitor, or for positioning an especially large and bulky monitor. Unfortunately, monitor arms can also be a bit expensive. A basic monitor arm off Amazon can run $30 to $50, but I’ve been burnt on their quality in the past. A good arm like those from Jarvis or Ergotron will start around $130.

Larger, heavier monitors will need a beefier, more expensive arm: the model Ergotron recommends for the 49-inch Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 is currently $379 (and, at the time I wrote this, sold out!)

Color accuracy is critical to image quality. An inaccurate monitor will look unnatural, flat, and dull, with strange swings in quality depending on what you’re viewing and the precise colors that are inaccurate (it’s common for monitors to be less accurate in blue or cyan than other colors, for example). A monitor with terrible color will disappoint you every time you sit down to use it.

The good news? Accuracy is low-key the greatest advancement in monitors over the last decade. Noticeably inaccurate displays were common when I began testing monitors well over a decade ago. Today, most midrange monitors have reasonable accuracy straight out of the box.

Still, there is a difference between midrange and premium monitors. Those who want great color accuracy should look for a “factory calibrated” monitor, which typically includes a calibration report in the box. This doesn’t guarantee color accuracy is perfect, but it at least shows the company put the monitor through an extra layer of quality assurance. Also check reviewers to see if the monitor lives up to its claims.

Color gamut, which describes the spectrum of colors a monitor can display, is also good enough on most monitors. The majority of content on a computer targets a color gamut called sRGB. Modern monitors display at least 95 percent of this gamut, and many display it all. Other gamuts also exist. DCI-P3 is the most advertised, though you may see Rec.709 or Adobe RGB as well. These gamuts are important if your work requires them, though if that’s the case, I’m guessing you know that. As with color accuracy, buyers concerned about gamut should read reviews to verify a monitor lives up to its claims.

Odds are your home office has some form of light control, whether it’s shades or simply a room that’s naturally a bit dim. The ideal brightness will vary based on the lighting in your home office, but a monitor’s brightness rarely needs to exceed 200 nits. In fact, most monitor calibration tools (like a SpyderX Elite I use) have a built-in luminance sensor used to recommend a brightness based on ambient light. I’ve never seen it recommend more than 200 nits.

That’s not a big ask, but budget monitors can’t always manage it, so be careful if you’re shopping on a tight budget. Manufacturers also tend to choose a best-case scenario when quoting brightness, so the listed brightness may not always be available. Buy a monitor that promises a maximum brightness of at least 250 nits (aka cd/m2).

High Dynamic Range, aka HDR, is a different story. This standard supports a way higher range of luminosity than SDR. HDR10, the most common standard, technically allows for a peak brightness up to 10,000 nits. Brightness does matter for HDR because the content includes additional luminance data that only HDR-compatible displays can show.

If you are looking for an HDR monitor, DisplayHDR certification labels could help, but know that “peak luminance” means “a tiny region on screen can get that bright,” and DisplayHDR 400 is barely HDR at all. Screenshot by Sean Hollister / The Verge

However, HDR is a bit of a minefield on the PC and can be counterproductive for work. Turning on HDR in Windows will often block a number of monitor controls you may need, including brightness, color gamut, and color temperature settings. The resulting image can appear eye-searingly bright and you’ll have less leeway to adjust it to your preferences.

Also, most content viewed in Windows or MacOS is not designed for HDR. You can still view it, but the result will be less accurate than if you stuck with SDR.

Entertainment and gaming is where HDR redeems itself. Most streaming platforms now offer a method for viewing HDR content on a PC and many new 3D games include HDR support. Windows 11 even has an auto-HDR feature that can add HDR to games that don’t officially support it. This makes HDR a nice addition to a monitor that you’ll use for work and play — though I’d recommend leaving HDR off until you clock out.

Nearly all monitors sold today use an LCD panel based on one of three technologies: twisted nematic (TN), in-plane switching (IPS), and vertical alignment (VA).

The least expensive monitors often use a TN panel. Avoid them. TN panel monitors will display an image, but that’s about it. They look achingly dull next to IPS and have astoundingly bad viewing angles.

A majority of monitors use IPS. Monitors based on IPS have very accurate color and can support a wide color gamut at a reasonable price. IPS struggles with dark scenes, however, because it can’t achieve a convincing shade of black. This is the dreaded “IPS glow” you may have heard of, which can look unappealing when watching movies or playing games. However, gamers still enjoy IPS monitors because some IPS panels have low response times and very high refresh rates.

What about VA? This panel type has the best contrast ratio and dark scene performance of the three, which makes VA a great go-to choice for entertainment and gaming. This is especially true of high-quality, modern VA panels, which have mostly solved the color accuracy and motion smearing issues of some past VA monitors.

The choice between IPS and VA has no clear answer, as both have their perks. When it comes to work, though, you may find the choice is made for you. A huge majority of productivity monitors use an IPS panel. VA is an option, but you’ll want to lean your search toward gaming monitors if you crave the high contrast a quality VA panel can provide.

I feel it’s nice to have, but far down on the list of features you need to consider. Also, you probably shouldn’t pay extra for a 75Hz monitor — it’s not much gain over 60Hz.

High-refresh gaming displays aren’t especially expensive, with 24-inch, 144Hz models sold for as little as $200. But you’ll typically trade something away for refresh rate: that $200 monitor might use an iffy TN panel (rather than IPS or VA) or feature a low resolution. It’s possible to snag a 4K display for a reasonable sum, or one with a high refresh rate, but going for 4K at 144Hz means looking at monitors that cost as much as big televisions.

Also, USB-C with Power Delivery is rarely found in gaming monitors, and I haven’t seen a USB-C gaming monitor that doubles as a USB-C hub. That could be an issue if your work setup involves a lot of wired peripherals.

Mini LED adds a twist. The fundamentals remain similar, but the backlight is divided into hundreds of zones that can turn on and off independently. This allows extra brightness but also convincing contrast in shadowy scenes. Mini LED is also outstanding for HDR movies and games, where its class-leading brightness provides an edge.

OLED? It flips the table, using an array of organic elements that create their own light. This provides pixel-level lighting control for truly unparalleled contrast you have to see to believe. OLED is also susceptible to burn-in, though there are ways to mitigate it from affecting a display prematurely.

Neither of these are necessary for working from home, and you’ll likely have to spend thousands to snag a monitor with either tech. Alternatively, you could buy a television with Mini LED or OLED technology, but televisions still have their downsides as monitors.

If you demand the very best from a monitor, however, I recommend Mini LED. OLED’s burn-in worries are legitimate on the PC which, compared to a television, will display static images more frequently. Mini LED can’t match OLED’s contrast, but it’s still a major upgrade over a backlit LCD screen. There’s also the emerging category of quantum dot OLED (QD-OLED) screens, but manufacturers haven’t announced prices for those yet.

Webcams are small, easy to move, and can be used with multiple devices. Attaching a webcam to a monitor removes these perks. It also means you can’t upgrade your webcam in the future; you’ll have to replace the entire monitor.

Coding and programming make lives easier for almost everyone that uses the internet. From big software to our everyday social media apps, everything runs on it.

Since it is heavy work, therefore, developers and programmers need something strong to work on. It is important to have the best technology in use to avoid any hassles or problems during your work. It is extremely hard to see the code through a wrong coding monitor and who wants that, right?

In this article, you will learn about some of the best monitors for programming and coding. However, before moving on to that, let’s first discuss what you need to check in a good monitor for coding and programming.

Buying a monitor for coding and programming is not as simple as entering a shop and buying the first monitor that you find in the market. You cannot invest in something that looks amazing, the inside of the monitor is what matters the most.

There are a lot of things that you need to check in your monitor before purchasing it. But don’t worry, it’s not impossible. Here’s what you need to check in the best monitor for coding.

When it comes to buying a monitor, the first thing that you need to check is the resolution. Unless the resolution is perfect, the monitor is of no use for a coder or programmer. Good resolution means sharp images and crisp view, right? – Well, isn’t this what a programmer would want to see the code clearly?

It’s important that you choose the highest resolution monitor for your coding and programming. A lot of people settle on 1080 pixels when they should be opting for 4K resolution. We also prefer 4K resolution monitors for coders and programmers. Isn’t it best to get 4K once rather than buying a graphics card later? It’s a one-time investment that is certainly worth it!

Another thing that you need to check in the monitor is its size. Well, there is nothing special about it apart from the fact that you will fall in love with your work again. Working on a big screen is a lot different than working on a smaller one. Even if you have the highest resolution monitor, a fairly large screen is a comfortable option. You don’t really have to peek into your monitor screen to check something.

Just like you’d prefer a large screen for gaming or movies, get a larger one for your programming work as well. The monitors usually come in 15-30inches. If you have a big room, then getting a giant screen may work for you. Considering the programming work here, a 20-25 inches screen would work best for coders and programmers.

Ask yourself – would you like to work in a fixed position for several hours or would you like some flexibility? If your answer is the latter one, then you know what you’re looking for.

Your budget will decide if you can even think of all these luxuries in your monitor. If you don’t have a budget, then you might be forced to look for a basic option that can work for the time being, but not a good option for long-term use.

If you can raise your budget a little, it would be best for you. Consider it a long-term investment that you’re making in your career. Delivering quality work will only get you more work, but with a basic monitor that might hard to achieve.

Buying a monitor can take some time and it’s okay to think about your prospects before purchasing one. A monitor for coding and programming is not the one that you’d buy to use paint in your PC or for content writing.

Coding and programming use heavy software, so it’s not just your CPU, but your monitor should be worth handling it as well. With the best colors and resolution, you can produce quality work. Do not think twice before investing in your monitor.

We have listed down some of the best monitors for software development. If you’re a programmer and you need help in finding the perfect monitor for work, then you can find one for you in this list. Just make sure that the one you choose falls under your budget!

Coding and programming get easier to do when it comes to working on HP VH240a. The monitor is extremely budget-friendly, so almost everyone can afford it.

One of the most amazing things about this monitor is that it comes with an ergonomic stand. You can adjust the screen to your liking and comfortably work on your projects.

Coming with an IPS panel along with 178-degree viewing angles, 8-bit color depth, and an incredible image resolution – this monitor is perfect for every programmer looking for an easy solution.

This monitor is also perfect for casual gaming, but don’t expect a lot from it as it comes with a 60Hz refresh rate and 5ms response time only. However, you can still get a smooth gaming experience with it.

Why are we calling it above average? Well, for the reason that it comes with a higher image resolution. Yes, this monitor comes with 1920×1200 resolution with IPS LCD making it amazing to work for programming and coding.

It’s one of the best monitors for programming that you can set at your office or home. Not to mention the ergonomic stand that makes it comfortable to use. The monitor is generally loved for its wide viewing angles and an adjustable stand, but it does not end here.

Where it has its pros, the cons are also there. You might find the black colors appearing a little cloudy at times and the contrast may not be the best. So, decide if you’d love to compromise a little for this beautiful monitor.

Are you someone who looks for productivity? If yes, then this monitor is all that you’re looking for. And, we’re not talking about just basic features here.

The design of the monitor is enough to capture your heart at first. However, well, there’s always a ‘however’. The resolution of the PC might be enough for gamers, but it may not be good enough for coders and programmers. The resolution is less as compared to the wide size of the monitor.

Another LG monitor that’s worth the type is LG 34WN80C-B. The monitor comes at a reasonably fair price and is worth it considering the 3440×1440 resolution. The monitor comes with an IPS panel that is the best for color-critical and productivity level work.

The USB-C port in the monitor is all that you’re looking for to charge a laptop, transfer data, or do much more. You will get 178 degrees wide viewing angles in this monitor with 10-bit color depth support that is perfect for coding or even graphics-related work.

You will not find such a good monitor at such a reasonable price with incredible brightness and contrast. The problem with the above monitor was low pixel density, well, good news for you!

This monitor offers around 110 pixels/inch, which is enough to get crisp text and details. This monitor is a wonderful option for anyone who has a medium budget but expects amazingness from their monitor.

Coming to another best monitor that you can get for yourself is this one. Before moving ahead with its incredible feature, let us make it clear that this monitor is pricey. So, set your budget accordingly if you’re rooting for it.

The monitors in Dell’s UltraSharp range has gathered a lot of attention, not to mention the many Editor’s Choice awards that it received. Similar to that, this monitor comes with IPS technology and displays excellent grayscale performance. The monitor comes with amazing viewing angles that will not tire out your eyes.

Coming in the amazing black color and less weight, you can carry this monitor anywhere you want. The monitor offers increased productivity and minimal eye fatigue. Since coders and programmers mostly work for long hours, this monitor might be the right choice for you. All you have to do is turn on the Eye Saver Mode or Flicker-Free technology to reduce eye strain.

Asus monitors are no doubt one of the best available in the market. If you’re looking for the best 4k monitor for programming, then this might be the right option for you.

The sharp UHD image quality of this monitor is all that you need to get a generous feature set, robust colors, and great image resolution. Not just that, the monitor comes with an amazing ergonomic stand that allows you to work pretty comfortably for hours on your seat.

Programmers and coders need something fast to work without a lag and this machine offers just that! Even if you’re into gaming, this monitor is the perfect choice for you.

Although the PC offers amazing and solid performance, there is still a downside. The monitor comes with no USB ports. Also, it shows skewed greens and the viewing angles might not be perfect. If you think you can live with these flaws, then get this PC for you as soon as possible. It’s definitely something that you’d like to try!

Not only perfect for image quality, but it’s a stylish choice as well. The UHD screen is all you need to get the job done and complete the level in your game. It’s a one-stop for everything.

This is not it – this monitor is more than you can imagine. It gives our 137.68 pixels/inch, so you can see what kind of pixel depth you’ll get here. If you’re seriously into a good monitor and have the budget for it, then BenQ is the one that we highly recommend!

The PC is made up of all-plastic, but the steadiness of the monitor will not give you a hint of it. It’s a wonderful machine that has everything that you will need in it. Even though it’s one of the best, you may not find internal speakers, HDMI switching, or 3D switching in it. But, it’s best in what it has to offer. If you’re looking for a reasonable option, but the best coding monitor, then this is it for you!

Delivering 4K sharp images is a piece of cake for this amazing yet efficient machine. Not to mention the truly amazing colors that you will get with it. With a 43-inch huge screen, you can not only enjoy gaming and good movies, but you will fall in love with your work as well.

The tasks that once seemed troubling and boring for you can turn into an interesting fiasco. Note that this PC has a lot to offer to customers other than good color and images, which is why it is expensive as well.

It further comes with five USB 3.0 ports, DisplayPort input, and various other ports. You can also enjoy good sound quality with its top-notch 8-watt speakers. This PC may have a large footprint and might be expensive, but it’s a must-have for every coder or programmer. So, don’t waste your time!

Last but not the least, here we are with the incredible BenQ PC that’s worth your money. As mentioned above, BenQ monitors are trusted worldwide and there’s a reason behind it – high efficiency!

This PC is not only the best for coders and programmers, but also gamers and graphic designers. It’s a wholesome package for anyone willing to invest in an elegant and highly-efficient machine.

Running at a response rate of 74Hz with 2560x1440p and only 4ms response rate is the Lenovo Q24h-10. This monitor comes in warm grey color that makes it look amazing. The incredible design of this PC is what catches everyone’s attention. Such a compact body makes it the perfect fit for any workstation.

Offering 123 PPI, you will enjoy the best colors and contrast on this PC. If you are after a crisp QHD picture, then this monitor is all that you need on your workstation. Don’t worry, the viewing angles are also decent with this PC. If you are looking for a reasonable option, then this monitor will not disappoint you.

Using the wrong PC to get the work done can affect your work quality, which nobody likes. The above list is all the PCs that you should be looking for to set your work station. Don’t waste your time and get on with your research!

Computer monitors are an essential tool for both large corporations and small businesses. One or more high-quality monitors can help to optimize employee workflow and boost productivity. Whether you’re an employer or a working professional, order CTL computer monitors to access stunning displays and top-grade performance.

The best computer monitor is going to depend on your own unique preferences and needs. For instance, if you tend to keep many tabs or applications open at once, a larger computer monitor will allow you to see more in one space. On the other hand, if you don’t want to simultaneously view multiple windows or if your workspace is limited in size, a smaller computer monitor may be ideal.

While all LED monitors are LCD monitors, the reverse isn’t true. There are LCD monitors that aren’t LED monitors. The difference between the two lies in the backlights. A typical LCD monitor uses fluorescent backlights to create the display, while LED monitors use light-emitting diodes. While the quality of each type of computer monitor depends on the particular product you’re looking at, LED monitors tend to have a higher-quality picture than LCD monitors.

Yes, CTL monitors can connect to Chromebooks. Connect your CTL computer monitor to your Chromebook by using the monitor’s HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, or VGA port. From there, you can have the computer monitor mirror your Chromebook’s display or use the monitor as an additional screen. Check out our Chromebook accessories to further enhance your experience.

Computer monitors can also be paired with a Chromebox. This high-powered computing solution allows you to optimize performance and meet all of your most pressing business or personal needs.

Programming and living behind a screen are basically synonymous, so for high-quality coding and study you deserve comfort and an optimized monitor is a great place to start. While the stereotype of the hacking coder, slouched into a chair, wearing a hoodie, and blasting their eyes with a bright screen in a dark room is fun to think about, the result will only be a horrible experience.

Instead, if you’re a real coder of today, you probably realize that you have a long, steady career ahead of you. Increased comfort and feeling good on the job will lead to a fruitful workday and a clear head, ready to innovate. With work from home not going anywhere soon, especially in the knowledge work sector, it is falling more and more on the shoulders of the worker to get their own computer equipment. As a result, we invite you to consider upgrading your life with one of our best monitors for programming picks.

Staring at screens, typing out notes, and looking through comparison tables is something both the writer and the programmer handle on a daily basis, so personal experience helped guide this guide. Discussing the matter of picking a monitor with software engineers themselves helps too, of course, with key concerns including size and resolution. I also looked at user impressions, their concerns, and what critics see as coming trends, such as more working from home; for these reasons, I adjusted toward results that prioritize comfort and eye health after long-term usage.

Ultimately, good monitors for programming are good monitors for computing. Expect to see some overlap in how programming monitors are evaluated with other categories of monitor, such as gaming monitors and trading monitors, etc. The key differences, such as being used for work activities with less chances of a break, are going to be where we put in a significant portion of our comparison efforts, but a good monitor will always be a good monitor.

Getting monitors for programming, much like getting monitors for home offices, can be tricky because you’ll want the monitor to be good for other purposes, too. Luckily, many of the factors that translate to being one of the best monitors for programming, also make for great general monitors. For example, programmers are likely to care a lot about size but people watching Netflix aren’t complaining about monitors being too big. We’ll examine all of the big factors in this sort of multimodal way, including resolution and comfort.

This one is relatively straightforward. In almost every case, bigger is better. The ability to have multiple windows open at the same time and look at things side-by-side cannot be overstated. Moving your head from one monitor to another can make direct comparisons tricky, whereas having everything ready at a glance will help keep you in a happy programming flow state.

While there are some people that might look at a very large screen and feel overwhelmed, it is easy to make your windows smaller and focus on what is important. You cannot do this the other way around—making windows larger than the screen to be more comfortable. Getting something a tad bigger than you’re used to will likely go fine, you’ll get acclimated to the larger size, but going too small will trap you in.

So, when might it be bad to have a larger monitor? When the monitor is so big that it pushes out your other monitors. Sure, the advantages of side-by-side comparison given by a large monitor are important, but that doesn’t mean that having the ability to throw some