small lcd monitors for coding pricelist

Programming is possible on nearly any monitor, but most programmers prefer a big, pixel-dense, attractive screen that can render tiny code with clarity and display numerous windows at once. Prolific multi-taskers, many programmers also go all-in on multiple displays and use two or three monitors at once.

This is a 34-inch ultrawide monitor with a resolution of 3440×1440, which provides plenty of display space and pixel density for viewing multiple windows or large amounts of code. It also has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alternate Mode and 90 watts of Power Delivery. That’s great for easily docking a USB-C-compatible laptop.

Though ideal for programming, the ProArt PG348CGV excels in any task thrown at it. It has accurate color and a wide color gamut, so it’s great for photo, video, and graphics editing. The monitor also has a 120Hz refresh rate and supports AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, which makes it a solid choice for gaming.

Its price seals the deal. Available for $749.99, the ProArt PG348CGV is less expensive than similar competitors. In fact, it overdelivers compared to most alternatives: Many ultrawide monitors offer similar image quality, a high refresh rate, or USB-C, but very few offer all three.

The U3223QE is a 32-inch widescreen monitor with 4K resolution. It offers a large, pixel-dense display that’s great for using four windows in a grid arrangement. The monitor’s high pixel density and strong brightness make code easy to read even when individual windows are small.

Its size and resolution are supported by excellent image quality. This is among the few monitors with an IPS Black panel, which roughly doubles the contrast ratio of a standard IPS panel. The result is a richer, more pleasant image. It also has excellent color accuracy, so it’s great for photo, video, and graphics editing.

The U3223QE is also among the best USB-C monitors available. When connected over USB-C it acts as a feature-rich USB-C hub with multiple USB-A ports, ethernet, audio-out, and DisplayPort-out. It’s perfect for programmers who need to dock a laptop over USB-C.

This monitor is a 27-inch widescreen with 4K resolution, offering a reasonably sized and pixel-dense space for viewing multiple windows at once. Its pixel density, which works out to 163 pixels per inch, is as high as you’ll find without upgrading to a more extravagant (and much more expensive) option such as a 5K or 8K display. Image quality is excellent, too, with top-notch color accuracy.

This is a USB-C monitor with 65 watts of Power Delivery and four USB-A ports. Its Power Delivery won’t be enough for high-end laptops but remains adequate for more portable machines, and its USB-A port selection is great for the price.

The AOC CU34G2X is a 34-inch curved ultrawide monitor with a resolution of 3440×1440. Its size and resolution are the same as our top pick, the Asus ProArt PA348CGV, so it’s just as useful for programming and multi-tasking.

This monitor uses a VA panel that provides an advantage in contrast ratio and black levels. Its color accuracy and color gamut, though not as good as more expensive alternatives, are more than acceptable in day-to-day use. This monitor supports a 144Hz refresh rate and adaptive sync, making it a solid choice for gaming after the workday is done.

Priced at $399.99 (and often available for less), the CU34G2X is more affordable than most alternatives. This does result in a few sacrifices. It’s not especially bright, so it’s best used in a room with some light control. It also lacks the wide color gamut and great color accuracy found in the ProArt PA348CGV. With that said, its overall image quality is solid and won’t distract from programming.

Programmers often want to use a second monitor—not just for viewing code, but also for managing the wide variety of extra programs (like Slack or Monday) that programmers must use to keep organized and connected. The LG DualUp 28MQ780-B is uniquely suited for this task.

The DualUp 28MQ780-B is a 28-inch monitor with an unusual 16:18 aspect ratio that’s a bit taller than it is wide. It can also rotate 90 degrees, if you’d prefer, to become a bit wider than it is tall. Either way, the monitor is close to square and about as tall as a 32-inch monitor. It also ships with a monitor arm, instead of a desktop stand, which is handy for positioning the monitor next to another display.

Programmers will be pleased with the monitor’s 2560×2880 resolution, which is higher than a 1440p monitor but slightly less than a 4K monitor. The monitor has great image quality with high color accuracy and a wide color gamut. It’s a USB-C monitor, too, providing up to 90 watts of Power Delivery for charging a connected laptop.

A larger monitor is often better for programming than a smaller one. This includes ultrawide monitors. A larger monitor effectively increases the size of everything on-screen, which in turn can make it easier to see. We think a 27-inch widescreen monitor is a comfortable minimum size to aim for, and all the monitors on this list are at least that large.

There are limits to size, though: A 48-inch display can be uncomfortable to use because it will lack pixel density and may require a lot of head and neck movement to see the corners of the screen.

A higher resolution provides more useable display space because it increases the number of pixels visible. If comparing a 1080p monitor to a 4K monitor, for example, the 4K monitor can literally display four times as many pixels.

Those pixels will also be easier to view and use because a higher resolution improves sharpness. Programmers will find a high-resolution monitor can maintain clarity in extremely small fonts. That’s great when viewing large chunks of code.

A wide range of connectivity, including USB-C, can be useful for programmers. That’s epically true for programmers who use a laptop and frequently dock/undock the laptop throughout the workday.

A USB-C connection can carry video over DisplayPort Alternate Mode and charge a connected laptop with Power Delivery. That makes it a one-cable solution for docking the laptop. Just plug it in and you’re good to go. In many cases, the USB-C monitor will even function as a USB-C hub.

Programing doesn’t require a monitor with good, or even modest, image quality. Functionally, most tasks core to programming would work just as well on a 20-year-old LCD as on a modern display.

However, most programmers find themselves working with or viewing various forms of media occasionally, whether it’s image files for UI elements or textures for a game. This is where superior image quality becomes useful. It will help programmers get a better idea of what the result looks like on a typical user’s display.

We use a SpyderXElite color calibration tool to measure the brightness, contrast, color gamut, and accuracy of each monitor. This tool, which can measure quality objectively, lets us directly compare hundreds of monitors.

Programmers need a lot of raw display space, and that display space needs to be as useful as possible. That means larger, more pixel-dense monitors are better for programming than smaller, less pixel-dense displays.

That’s not to say programmers can’t use smaller displays, and not all programmers have the same workflow. Some only need to view code from a single source at once, while others may have several open windows showing code from different programs, or different portions of the same program.

Programming often requires multi-tasking, which can result in a lot of open windows. A large display is helpful, but the display also needs to be pixel dense, as this helps ensure that small text and interface elements are readable.

With that said, 1440p resolution is often just fine for programming. This resolution may look a bit rough when viewing very, very small font sizes, but that’s a less common use case. 1440p looks sharp in typical use.

Ultrawide monitors provide more display space than a similarly sized widescreen monitor. A 34-inch ultrawide monitor, for example, is the same height as a 27-inch widescreen but provides 25 percent more overall display space. That’s great when viewing two, three, or four windows at once.

There is a trade-off, however: Most ultrawide monitors don’t support 4K resolution but are instead equivalent to 1440p resolution. There are exceptions, such as the LG 40WP95C-W, but they’re very expensive and not worth the price premium in most situations.

The best monitors for programming will make coding your creative projects all the more comfortable. You might think that any display would do for this, after all, you don"t need any special features when you"re just looking at syntax, variables, and data structures all day. However, much like how an ergonomic and comfortable keyboard can make a huge difference in your typing experience, having the ideal programming monitor can also drastically improve your workflow.

In fact, there are several things to consider when choosing the best monitor for programming. Your top considerations must be the screen size, aspect ratio, and orientation. While such displays aren"t your only options, those that have a larger aspect ratio or a portrait mode will serve you better as they are better at displaying long sections of code. If that isn"t an option for you, you must get one with multitasking features like Picture-by-Picture.

If you"re using one of the best laptops for programming, you might need USB-C connectivity as well. Since you’ll be staring at that display for hours, flicker-free technology and blue light filters that minimise eye strain are also features you’ll want. And, don"t forget to consider colour accuracy and colour coverage if your projects include images and video.

To help you choose the best monitor for programming, we’ve applied our expertise and gathered the most ideal displays we"ve used, tested, or fully reviewed, keeping in mind different needs and budgets. For more about how we rate and review monitors, see our how we test page.

The LG UltraFine Display 32UL950’s steep price tag might be tough to swallow, especially if you’re only starting out as a programmer, but it"s a superb screen that features 600 nits of brightness, HDR600 support, and 98% DCI-P3 colour coverage. It’s a pleasure to not just code on, but also for playing a PC game or for viewing films.

At 32 inches, this display is large enough that you won"t be squinting at your text code and you have enough room for viewing multiple windows side-by-side. An elegant design with minimal bezels adds to the sense of an immersive workflow, while Thunderbolt 3 connectivity allows for data transfer speeds of 40GB per second.

If you"re new to programming or still studying, then you"ll probably want a monitor for programming that"s kinder on your bank account, but ideally without sacrificing quality. Fortunately, there are a few good affordable options out there, including the VP2458 Professional from ViewSonic. At under $300/£300, it falls within everyone’s budget, but it still offers some attractive features for programmers.

It comes with the kind of blue light filter offered by pricier monitors so you can reduce eyestrain even if you’re on an all-nighter to make a deadline. It also delivers lifelike colours with its 100% sRGB coverage and quick and easy colour calibration. The 24in panel makes it a good size to fit in a dorm or small apartment setup while an adjustable setup allows you to work in the best posture even if you’re in a tight space. On top of that, the near-frameless design offers a seamless visual experience when using multi-monitor setups if you want to go down that avenue.

The BenQ EX3203R is primarily aimed at gamers, but when we reviewed the screen, we found it to be ideal for general productivity work too. We think it"s a brilliant monitor for programming too thanks to its high resolution and large screen size. So if you"re both a coder and a keen gamer, this is an option that"s well worth considering. It boasts 1440p resolution, which is ideal for coding as it gives you more pixels to work with than a 1080p monitor, but doesn"t go overboard like a 4K monitor.

The Dell UltraSharp U3223QZ is made specifically for productivity and multitasking. That means that it comes loaded with multitasking features that programmers will certainly appreciate, including auto KVM (Keyboard, Mouse, Video), Picture-by-Picture (PbP) and Picture-in-Picture (PiP), and the ability to daisy chain two 4K monitors. Several highly accurate creative colour modes are on hand as well for your projects that might involve graphics, images, or videos. All those should make up for the lack of portrait mode.

As we now live in a world where working from home or remotely is the norm, its best feature is that built-in intelligent webcam that delivers up to 4K at 30 fps or 1080p at 60fps video and comes with a SafeShutter feature. That should effortlessly connect you with clients, project managers, and other colleagues whether you"re based at home full-time or following a hybrid model.

We honestly don"t know why there aren"t more 16:18 monitors for coders, writers, and other multitaskers. Even though we haven"t done a full review of the LG DualUp Monitor 28MQ780, LG"s latest offering with a 16:18 aspect ratio and a fully articulating mount and stand, it only took us a couple of hours of use to be fully convinced of its brilliance.

Touting a squarish format, this 2560 x 2880 monitor is always wide enough to display what you need from every open window, regardless of whether it"s in landscape or portrait mode. It also helps you organise those windows by allowing you to snap them up into a stack of two or three, brilliantly making them effortlessly accessible and showing more than enough content.

We"ve already included an ultrawide monitor in the list, but one that sits at the lower end of the definition and is suitable for more desk types. The Samsung CRG9 sits at the other end, offering a huge 49-inch screen, with a 32:9 ratio. It"s a huge amount of workspace, which means you can have all your apps, websites and more open at once. And thanks to multiple inputs and picture-in-picture mode, you can hook up two devices and use them together on the same monitor, making for a more space-efficient option than using multiple monitors.

The BenQ EW3280U may be from the manufacturer"s entertainment series and designed specifically for multimedia consumption, but we found that it makes for an excellent productivity monitor. The price is great for budget-conscious coders, and features like its light sensors that detect ambient light and optimizes brightness and colour temperature accordingly are brilliant for your eyes.

Huawei’s spiffy offering, the Huawei MateView, is undeniably sleek and brilliantly designed. For example, it keeps its super neat, incredibly thin design while still offering an impressive selection of ports by utilising its stand. Just as impressive are its specs that include 100% sRGB and 98% DCI-P3 colour coverage, up to DeltaE<1 colour accuracy, 500 nits of brightness, and HDR 400. Of course, being a USB-C monitor, it also boasts a USB-C port that supports data and video transfer as well as up to 65W Power Delivery.

Another huge 49in ultrawide option is the Philips Brilliance 499P9H. Like the Samsung monitor above, this also offers a more streamlined alternative to working with multiple monitors. With all that screen real estate you"re getting, you can spread out as much as you can, which in turn saves you time and allows you to focus on your work.

True to its multi-tasking nature, it also boasts a built-in USB-C docking station, a built-in KVM switch to easily switch between sources, and power delivery up to 65W, allowing you to power and charge your notebook via USB-C. Stock is low in the US at the moment. This award-winning monitor for programming isn"t cheap, however, so only invest if the whole package is worth it to you.

There are some important considerations to bear in mind when buying a monitor for coding. Firstly, there"s the matter of size. You"ll want a screen that is large enough that you"re not forced to strain to see, but not so big that you feel uneasy working on it. A huge monitor that looms over you can be uncomfortable, although that can be remedied with curved screens, which avoid you having to strain your neck to see all parts of the screen.

Another important factor is resolution. The higher the resolution, the more room you have to work, and text can look sharper too. However, ultra-high resolutions can leave text looking very small, which again is uncomfortable, although on both macOS and Windows 10, you can tweak the scaling of text so that it"s more comfortable to read on high-resolution monitors.

Ergonomics are important too. The best monitors for programming are easily adjustable, offering a good range of movement. You might also like a monitor that can be rotated to portrait orientation. Other features to look out for include blue light filtering and flicker reduction, which help take the strain off your eyes. Some monitors also offer automatic brightness adjustment, which fine-tunes the display to suit the ambient light of your setting, again helping to avoid eyestrain. It might also be worth looking at the best monitor stands to ensure you get your setup just right.Are 4K monitors suitable for programming?When you’re coding, a monitor’s resolution will not factor in quite the way it would with other content creators. Having access to stunning graphics, at least for work, doesn’t hold the same priority as being able to work in comfort. However, that doesn’t mean you should ignore UHD monitors when looking for that next display.

UHD displays do offer one particular benefit to coders over their lower-res counterparts. That higher resolution provides more screen real estate and allows you to fit more windows on your screen while working. If anything, that higher resolution allows a more streamlined workflow.How big should my monitor be for programming?A display’s size depends largely on how you work and what your setup is like. If you plan on sitting further back, you’ll want to use a larger monitor so you can see everything clearly. But, if you work in more cramped quarters, you’ll want to have the entire display within your field of vision. And, that means downsizing. Otherwise, you’ll end up moving your eyes and neck to the point of discomfort.Is a curved screen good for programming?Choosing between a flat or curved panel is mostly a matter of preference. Flat panels lend themselves much better to multi-display setups, with some of them can rotate 90 degrees to use in portrait mode.

If you’re planning on sitting a little closer to your monitor, a curved monitor might be better, especially if you don’t plan on adding a second panel. The curvature gives you a more immersive viewing experience, letting you see the corners of the screen without having to refocus on different parts of the screen. That curved design will also alleviate eye fatigue and strain.Why do coders use vertical monitors?When you use a vertical monitor, you’re able to read and skim through much larger portions of your work at once. Since lines of code don’t get very long, the width of a monitor doesn’t come into play when writing or reading through your code the way it does for photo or video editing work. So, turning a monitor into portrait mode makes the best use of your screen space. Of course, you’ll want to pair that with a monitor in landscape mode to see the results.

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

The best budget monitor we"ve tested is the Dell S2721QS. It"s mainly designed to be an office monitor and provides excellent office performance, especially for its price. Not many 4k monitors are available at a budget-friendly price, which is why the S2721QS is a good choice for this price range, as you get a high resolution for a low cost. The 4k resolution helps result in sharp text, which makes it ideal for productivity as you won"t have any issues reading text, and the 27-inch screen is big enough to open two windows side-by-side. Despite its budget price, it"s a well-built monitor with impressive ergonomics, making it easy to place in an ideal position.

It"s a good choice to use in a well-lit room thanks to its high SDR peak brightness and very good reflection handling, meaning you won"t have any issues with visibility. It also has wide viewing angles that make the image remain consistent from the sides. There are a few downsides, though, as it"s limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, so it isn"t good for PC gaming, and it"s a better option if you need something for work.

The best cheap monitors offer a gorgeous picture experience, but you know, without the bank account-burning price tag. They also serve up impressive displays, decent brightness, accurate colors, VESA-mount compatibility, and more. You shouldn"t have to shell out heaps of dollars just to snag the best cheap monitor for yourself, right?

However, finding the best cheap monitors isn"t easy, whether you"re looking for a gaming monitor or a work-from-home display. There are somany aspects to consider, including brightness, color quality, resolution, size, refresh rates and more! Taking all of these factors into consideration, we"ve rounded up a list of the best cheap monitors you can buy.

The Acer R240HY bidx monitor has a 4.7 out of 5-star rating on Amazon(opens in new tab), which is pretty darn close to perfection if you ask us! This 23.8-inch stunner is one of the best monitors of 2023 because of its ultra-slim bezels and sleek design, gorgeous, vivid colors and wide viewing angles.

Users heralded the the Acer R240HY bidx as an excellent choice for the external monitor experience and for hooking up with one"s gaming console. The Acer monitor for its 178-degree wide viewing angles, impressive 72% color gamut coverage, as well as its low-blue light feature for those who work hours upon hours staring at a monitor for work (Acer Vision Care). Ports include VGA, HDMI and DVI.

The 24-inch ViewSonic VP2458 Professional is the best cheap monitor for users seeking a monitor with vivid and accurate color. This ViewSonic color has a Delta E score that is less than 2 — the closer to zero, the better. Delta-E tells you how accurate the colors on your monitor will be, so you can be rest assured than ViewSonic"s color accuracy will be satisfactory for your viewing pleasures. The ViewSonic monitor will likely appeal to graphic designers and other digital artists.

The Asus VS228H-P monitor is one of the best cheap monitors due to its bargain price, but it comes at the expense of screen size, offering a 22-inch screen with a basic TN panel.

The AOC C24G1 24-inch Curved Frameless Gaming Monitor is one of the best cheap monitors you can get with a high refresh rate of 144Hz. There"s a reason why it"s got an Amazon rating of 4.6 stars out of 5. Customers who"ve had the pleasure of taking this beautiful monitor home gush about its sharp, crisp visual quality -- it"s not as visually pleasing as a 4K monitor, of course, but the picture quality is impressive.

The AOC C24G1 24-inch Curved Frameless Gaming Monitor has a quick response rate of 1ms, which is particularly useful for games requiring fast reflexes or precise timing. This is a great selling point for gamers: in gaming situations where the difference between life and death is measured in milliseconds, having a speedy response rate is crucial to have an edge over your opponents.

HP sells the Omen in several display sizes, but let"s zoom in on the HP Omen 24.5-inch model that you can snag for around $250(opens in new tab). What we love about the HP Omen as the best cheap monitor is that it has everything a gamer needs to have a satisfying, immersive gaming experience.

The Dell P2219H monitor has an impressive 4.7 out of 5 stars on Amazon due its modern, thin-bezel design, variety of ports and angle versatility. For those with sensitive eyes, Dell introduced a ComfortView feature that reduces blue-light emissions that can harm you. So if you tend to spend hours and hours at work on your monitor, you can reduce the straight on your eyesight.

This Dell SE2416H monitor is ideal for everyday productivity. It has a stylish, elegant design, and customers are ravingabout its sturdy base of excellent build quality. The quality is decent for a sub-$200 monitor, providing sharp colors and crisp picture. It"s packed with VGA and HDMI ports for your connectivity needs.

This monitor has viewing angles of 178 degrees vertically and 178 degrees vertically. Its panel has an anti-glare coating and covers 84% of the color gamut. One downside, however, is that it"s not VESA mount compatible. However, it"s not the end of the world; you can always purchase a VESA adapter such as the Dell Monitor Arm/Mount VESA Adapter(opens in new tab) for $26.

The SE2416HX is the best cheap monitor from Dell. It has an attractive price for a 24-inch display. Viewing angles are quite good; thanks to an IPS panel. Its color accuracy is solid (0.11) -- if not the best we’ve seen -- and its 108% of the sRGB color gamut is in the middle of the pack.

However, there are some trade offs for the cheaper price tag. The Dell SE2416HX monitor suffers from dimmer-than-average brightness (averaging 179 nits) and slow response times (6 milliseconds) that result in image smearing when viewing fast-paced video or games. The monitor has an attractively sleek design with inputs for both HDMI and VGA, but it lacks any mounting support. It is covered by a one-year warranty.

In this price range, expect screens that are less than 30 inches and have 1080p (1920 x 1080) resolution, but not higher. Some of the budget monitors we looked at use IPS display technology, but the majority use the older TN panels, which often suffer from narrower viewing angles and less accurate color. You’ll also give up conveniences like built-in USB connections, faster refresh rates and height-adjustable stands.

Let"s talk screen size. Monitors can be anything from 20 inches to 49 inches, more or less, in size. But if you don"t want to spend too much on a monitor, you"ll have to settle for a screen display that"s under 30 inches.

You"ll also want to consider resolution, which refers to the number of horizontal and vertical pixels -- the higher the number, the sharper your display will be. However, when it comes to cheap monitors, it"s not likely that you"ll get anything higher than 1080p resolution (1920 x 1080 pixels). The bigger your screen gets, the higher the resolution should be. For example, a 1080p monitor might be fine on a 24-inch monitor, but not so much on a 27-inch monitor because it would have to "stretch" itself to fit more screen real estate.

There are four main types of panels: TN, IPS, VA and OLED. TN and VA panels are usually the least expensive. On the plus side, TN panels feature decent response times and low input lag, but tend to offer not-so-great color richness and viewing angles. VA panels offer better contrast and vibrant colors, but typically are not recommended for budget gamers (TN may be a better choice for response rates, but you"ll have to sacrifice image quality). IPS offers better image quality than TN and VA panels, but the response time may be subpar for a gamer. IPS panels are best for creators (e.g. video editors, image editors) seeking the best cheap monitor. OLED is the priciest option -- you likely won"t find this premium panel on a cheap monitor.

You"ll also need to observe which ports you"ll need. Most current laptops, for example, use one or more of the following for display connections: HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-C (Thunderbolt 3). You"ll want to double-check to see if your chosen monitor can effectively connect with your laptop.

What makes for one of the best monitors for programming? Plenty of pixels doesn’t hurt, that’s for sure. The more screen real estate, the more windows and applications you can have open at the same time, be that for coding itself or for collaboration tools.

Ergonomics matter, too. Preferences vary, but many programmers like to have at least the option to rotate a screen into portrait mode to maximize screen height, the better to see as many lines of code at once without the need for scrolling. Similarly, good connectivity can improve ergonomics, especially if you are primarily a laptop user, so USB-C is very desirable.

Less critical are factors like HDR support, extreme color accuracy, high refresh rates and the erest. For sure, you want a screen with decent contrast and colors, if nothing else than to minimize eye strain. But huge dynamic range, eye-piercing brightness and extensive coverage of gamuts like DCI-P3 add cost to a screen for little benefit in a programming context.

Why you can trust TechRadarOur expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

First up, we’d look for a fairly high resolution screen. 4K panels are now pretty affordable, especially in 27-inch and 28-inch form factors. That said, 1440p can be a reasonable choice for programming. If you’re the kind of coder who likes to rotate a screen into portrait mode, a pair of cheaper 1440p panels with support for rotation into portrait mode could be an interesting value-orientated option.

On the other hand, if you like to code with several application windows lined up in parallel, an ultrawide panel can make a lot of sense, too. That’s especially true now that one or two ultrawide monitors can be had with 2,160 vertical pixels. So, you’re giving up little when it comes to vertical resolution.

All of that said, we’d still prioritize a higher resolution 4K-plus panel in order to maximize pixel density. When you’re looking at code all day, nice crisp fonts can really help keep eye strain to a minimum. Again, a panel with a fully adjustable stand with support for rotation into portrait would be our pick.

As for panel type and performance, well, IPS technology has the advantage of wide viewing angles, which can be especially helpful in multi-monitor situations. We wouldn’t kick a VA 4K monitor out of bed, though, especially if it was attractively priced.

What we wouldn’t worry about so much is refresh, HDR support and the last word in pixel response. Paying extra for a 120Hz-plus panel provides little benefit for coding. The same applies to HDR monitors with fancy technology like mini-LED backlighting or wide gamut color support, or indeed uber-fast pixel response. All of that just adds cost without any significant upside.

If you’re looking for some affordable 4K action for programming, put the Philips 288E2A on your shortlist. It’s a 28-inch 4K model with plenty of desktop real estate for coding. The pixel density is also decent, so fonts and menus are nice and crisp. It uses an IPS panel, which makes for excellent viewing angles, albeit this isn’t the brightest screen in the world at 300 nits and there’s absolutely no HDR support.

It’s worth noting there’s no USB-C connectivity, which isn’t a huge surprise at this price point. The slim-bezel design looks contemporary and the stand provides both height and tilt adjustment. But there’s no support for rotation into portrait mode, which is a pity. But for the money, this is a lot of monitor.

Rotating monitors into portrait mode is a popular approach for programmers looking to maximize how much code they can see without scrolling. But the Huawei MateView approaches that problem a little differently. Instead of the usual 16:9 or even 21:9 widescreen aspect ratio, this is an unusually tall 3:2 aspect panel. However, it’s still very high resolution with 3,840 by 2,560 on a 28.2-inch panel. In other words, it’s a 4K monitor with added vertical space. Perfect for coding, some programmers would say.

The USB-C interface with 65W of power delivery for easy single-cable connectivity is another major upside, especially for laptop users. On top of that, this is a punchy panel rated at 500 nits and offers good accuracy at 98 percent coverage of DCI-P3. Not directly relevant for coding, perhaps, but you’re certainly getting great value for money and a strong all-round package.

4K at 32-inches is a seriously nice combo that delivers both nice crisp fonts for coding, plus plenty of desktop real estate for viewing multiple windows and apps at the same time. The AOC U32P2 gives you all that from a 32-inch VA panel at a reasonably affordable price. The VA panel delivers great contrast, which is ideal for extended use.

Granted, at this price point you don’t get USB-C single-cable connectivity with power delivery. But ergonomically, this monitor is a win, thanks to a stand that supports a full range of adjustments including rotate into portrait mode. All told, it’s a very appealing overall package for getting some serious work done.

Big screens used to mean fat pixels. But not with the Dell UltraSharp U4021QW. This 40-inch beast boasts 5,120 by 2,160 pixels and the same pixel density as a 32-inch 4K monitor. The result is both huge working space and nice, crisp fonts for coding.

You also get excellent color coverage at 98 percent of the DCI-P3 gamut but even more importantly, USB-C connectivity with 90W of power delivery for slick, single-cable connectivity. It’s not cheap, of course, this 40-inch machine, and there’s no HDR support. But as conventional SDR panels for programming go, this is one heck of a monitor.

It’s a no frills monitor with no USB-C connectivity and no HDR capability. BUt the VA panel delivers good contrast and loads of working space for viewing multiple windows and apps in parallel. The chassis also supports VESA mounting, so it could make for an interesting option mounted to a VESA stand and orientated into portrait mode for a massive 3,440 pixels and zillions of lines of viewable code.

Pixel density matters when it comes to nice, crisp fonts. And nice crisp fonts make long coding sessions more comfortable. So go for a high resolution monitor.

Rotating a widescreen monitor into portrait mode provides oodles of space for viewing code without scrolling. Not all monitors can switch to portrait mode.

USB-C connectivity with power delivery makes life so much easier and tidier for laptop users. Simply hook up to the display and your peripherals with a single cable.

We review monitors based on a number of factors including price, design, and performance. We consider the size of each display, along with panel type, resolution, refresh rate, color coverage and HDR support. We also consider connectivity, including HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-C and wireless interfaces.

Pixel density and color accuracy are particularly important for digital design monitors, but so are ergonomics, so we assess stand adjustability and stability. Finally, build quality and value for money are judged against competitors in the market.Round up of today"s best deals

Who this is for: A dual-monitor setup is usually the best option if you want to have a bunch of app windows open at once. But an ultrawide model might be a better choice if you need a ton of unbroken horizontal space, or you don’t want monitor bezels in between windows.

Why we like it: The Dell P3421W has a sturdy adjustable stand, lots of ports (including a USB-C port that can handle power, display, and data over a single cable), and a three-year warranty. And it has a built-in KVM switch that allows you to easily swap your keyboard, mouse, and video between two computers. The 1440p display has a 60 Hz refresh rate, which is great for typical office work, web browsing, and casual gaming.

Flaws but not dealbreakers: If you use your display in direct sunlight, this monitor might not be bright enough for you. It can also provide 65 W of power over USB-C, but some laptops require more. If you have a laptop with an Nvidia GeForce RTX GPU or an Intel Core i7 processor, you might need to keep the laptop plugged in to a separate charger or use a Thunderbolt dock that can provide the extra power.

Most ultrawide monitors are also curved. This design helps minimize viewing-angle problems—when you’re sitting centered, things on the far edges of the screen won’t look as washed out as they would on a flat display of a similar width. But this also makes ultrawide monitors inaccurate for precision tasks requiring straight lines, such as drawing, photo editing, or similar design work.

The Asus ProArt Display PA278CV has a great-looking screen with good enough color accuracy for most people and all the ports you need to hook up desktop or laptop PCs. The PA278CV’s stand can tilt, swivel, and pivot the screen and raise and lower its height, its USB-C port can provide enough power to charge most 13-inch laptops, and it comes with a three-year warranty and a good dead-pixel policy. Its QHD resolution (2560×1440) means it isn’t as sharp as a 4K screen, but it’s also hundreds of dollars cheaper than comparable 4K monitors.

The MD271QP has a USB-C connection, making it easy to connect a modern laptop without the need for an HDMI cable or extra dongle. However, you’ll still need to plug in your laptop’s charging cable.

The MSI Modern MD271QP is a simple, streamlined 1440p monitor that’s perfect for laptop users. If you have a laptop with a USB-C port, a single cable will send the image to the monitor and slowly charge your laptop with 15 watts of power. However, you’ll still need to plug in a power cable as well to keep your laptop fully charged. The MD271QP lacks features we liked in the Asus ProArt PA278CV,including a built-in USB hub, granular color calibration controls, and blue-light filtering modes for reading. But if you don’t need to tinker with color settings or those extra USB connections, the MSI Modern MD271QP is a great monitor for $100 less than our top pick.

The Dell S2722QC is a 3840×2160 display that’s great for anyone who watches 4K content or casually edits photos or video. However, if most of your time is spent on general office work or browsing the internet, you don’t really need to spend the extra cash. The S2722QC has a USB-C port with 65 watts of charging, so it can power most laptops except higher-end devices like the Dell XPS 15-inch or the 16-inch MacBook Pros (which are picks in our guide to the best laptops for video and photo editing). For more powerful 4K displays, check out our guide for the best 4K monitors.

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

Computer monitors are a must-have for PC users and hardcore gamers. Consumers may be looking at computer monitor buying guides and wondering just how much a typical computer monitor costs and the overall price range of displays.

Modern computer monitors can fluctuate wildly when it comes to price, with some models as cheap as $50 and others costing $1000 or more. In the past, the first computer with a screen was astronomically expensive, but thankfully monitor technology become more accessible, bringing the price down throughout the decades. The average computer monitor costs around $200 – $300. There are some features and functionalities that can severely impact the price so be sure to do some research so you make sure you’re getting the best cheap monitor if you have a lower budget.

Generally speaking, LCD displays are the cheapest type of modern computer monitor. LED displays, which are based on the same technology as their LCD cousins, tend to be slightly more expensive while OLED displays are the most expensive of all. The latter being due to the high-priced components that make up the OLED technology.

Modern computer monitors can boast resolutions as high as 8K, offering stunning and true-to-life visuals and graphics. 8K, and even 4K, displays feature newly adopted technological advancements. As such, the higher the resolution, the costlier the monitor. If you are looking to snag a high-quality monitor on the cheap, go for an HD display with a 1080p resolution.

If you are using your PC to stream content or to play graphically intensive games, then the refresh rate is an incredibly important consideration. The refresh rate indicates how often your monitor refreshes the screen. As for price, monitors with ultra-high refresh rates, above 120Hz, tend to be more expensive than displays with refresh rates of 75Hz or less.

The overall size of a computer monitor, and its width, can impact the overall price. Typically, ultrawide monitors and displays that are larger than 34-inches tend to be on the expensive side. This price continues to increase as the monitor size increases. Get the size that may cater better to your needs if you need the monitor for a specific task, like the best size monitor for gaming should help make your gameplay more efficient. Ultrawide monitors and larger-than-average monitors can significantly increase the viewing angle, which can be a useful benefit.

Certain monitors include additional features that can impact the price. These can include USB hubs, integrated stereo speakers, microphones, ergonomically designed frames, and more. Some monitors also include robust cable management systems, making for a tidy setup. We recommend making a “must-have” list of features before settling on your final purchase.

So, if the price is a problem for you and you’d rather have a better resolution without the high price tag, you may be interested in learning how to build a PC monitor. It’s easier than it sounds.

In this guide, we’ll recommend some of the best monitors for programming. Because one monitor won’t suit everyone, we’ve chosen several winners. Here’s a quick summary:

Game developers may prefer the Samsung C49RG9. While it has fewer pixels, they’re more responsive, especially where user input is concerned. It’s wide—basically two 1440p monitors side by side—so it’s a terrific alternative to a two-monitor setup. The downside? It’s almost triple the cost of our overall winner.

Our UltraWide picks, the LG 34UC98 and 34WK650, are a little more affordable. They’re both huge 34-inch monitors. The latter includes more pixels at a higher price.

Finally, our budget pick is the Acer SB220Q. It’s the cheapest, smallest, and lightest monitor in our roundup, so it’s a great choice if you’re short of room on your desk.

Are there any differences between the needs of a writer and a programmer when choosing a monitor? Yes, there are a few, especially for game developers. I cover them in detail in the next section.

This 27-inch monitor is big enough for most developers. While it doesn’t have the huge 5K resolution of the LG 27MD5KB below, it can still be considered a Retina display and has a much more palatable price. Text is sharp and readable, and the lack of flicker allows you to work without eye strain.

It’s not the largest or sharpest monitor in our roundup, but it’s our favorite. If you’re willing to pay a premium, you can read about higher-end options below. It’s also not the ideal monitor for game developers due to its refresh rate. But for everyone else, LG’s 27UK650 offers the best balance between price and features.

It’s just that the pixels are arranged differently, in a curved Super UltraWide configuration equivalent to having two 1440p monitors next to one another. It also costs as much as two 1440p displays!

The C49RG9 has a huge 49-inch display with an impressive number of pixels, though it’s not a Retina display. Despite the number of pixels, its high refresh rate and short input lag make it suitable for game developers.

LG offers several alternatives. A more affordable option is the lower-resolution LG 34WK650. It’s the same physical size, but has a screen resolution of 2560 x 1080, resulting in a pixel density of 81 PPI that may look a little pixelated.

If the budget isn’t your absolute priority, and you’re willing to spend a little more for a larger monitor, take a look at Acer’s R240HY. While it has a larger diagonal length of 23.8 inches, the resolution remains the same. Its lower pixel density of 92 PPI is still acceptable, but if you sit a little close to your monitor, it may appear a little pixelated.

The Dell U2518D is one of our finalists and will suit many developers. At 25 inches, it’s reasonably large and has good resolution and pixel density. It also has very low input lag, so it is an option for game developers looking for a more affordable monitor.

Another finalist, theViewSonic VG2765, offers a clear, bright 27-inch screen. However, I believe that the LG 27UK650, our overall winner, offers better value for your money by cramming significantly more pixels in the same space.

The Dell UltraSharp UP3218K is the most expensive monitor we list by far—and it’s overkill for almost any developer. It offers an incredibly high 8K resolution in a 31.5-inch display, resulting in the highest pixel density of our roundup. It’s also one of the brightest monitors on our list and offers very good contrast. As impressive as all that sounds, those specs are wasted on most programmers.

The Dell U3818DW gives our UltraWide winner a run for its money. The Dell offers a larger screen and more pixels (it’s more a competitor to the LG 38WK95C, also mentioned above), but has the slowest input lag of our roundup.

The Acer Predator Z35P is an excellent UltraWide monitor with a lot of similarities to our winner. The biggest difference is the price—this one is far more expensive, and the LG offers significantly better value for money. Other than that, the Acer has better contrast while the LG is significantly lighter.

The Dell U4919DW is one of our finalists, and only one of three Super UltraWide monitors to find a place in our roundup—the others being our winners for game development, the Samsung C49RG9, and C49HG90. The Samsungs have a better refresh rate, brightness, and contrast. Most other specs are similar.

Another affordable monitor with a pixel density of 92 PPI, the HP VH240a meets most of the needs of a developer. How does it compare with our budget pick, the Acer SB220Q? The Acer is quite a bit cheaper, and because it has the same screen resolution housed in a smaller monitor, pixel density is far superior.

The physical dimensions of your monitor don’t tell the whole story. Specifically, a larger monitor won’t necessarily display more information. For that, you need to consider the screen resolution, measured in pixels vertically and horizontally.

Notice that monitors with a high pixel count cost more. The price jumps significantly for 5K, 8K, and UltraWide monitors. Unless you’re on a tight budget or need the small size of a 21.5-inch monitor, I recommend you don’t consider anything smaller than 1440p.

At those higher resolutions, the size of the text on the screen becomes frustratingly small, so scaling is used to make it more legible. Scaling results in a lower effective screen resolution (in terms of how many characters can be displayed on the screen) while maintaining the same very sharp text of the higher resolution.

Super UltraWide monitors with a 32:9 ratio are twice the width of 16:9—the same as placing two Widescreen monitors side by side. They’re useful for those who want a double-screen setup with just one monitor. 21:9 and 32:9 monitors are often curved to reduce the viewing angle at the edges.

High contrast monitors do offer some benefits. According to Samsung’s white paper, a high contrast ratio makes text easier to read, helps avoid eye strain and fatigue, allows you to differentiate different shades of black in dark rooms, and makes pictures feel more immersive.

A monitor’s refresh rate indicates the number of images it can display per second. Higher refresh rates produce smoother motion, which is especially important for game developers. A variable refresh rate may eliminate stuttering when frame rates change.

A 60 Hz refresh rate is fine for general use, but game developers would be better with at least 100 Hz. Depending on your budget, that may mean choosing a monitor with lower pixel density.

Input lag is the length of time, measured in milliseconds, that it takes for something to appear on screen after your computer receives input such as typing, moving your mouse, or pressing a button on a game controller. This is another vital consideration for gamers and game developers. A lag of less than 15 ms is preferable.

Flicker-free monitors are much better at displaying motion. This makes them a great choice for game developers or gamers. These monitors are flicker-free:

Some developers prefer to use a vertical, portrait-orientation for at least one of their monitors. That may be because they display narrower columns of code as well as more lines of code. You can read plenty of discussions on the subject online.

Some developers are happy with just one monitor and find that it helps them focus on the task at hand. Others prefer two, or even three, and claim to find it much more productive. Here are some arguments for both sides:

There’s a third alternative. A Super UltraWide monitor offers the same screen space as two monitors side-by-side but in a single, curved display. Maybe it’s the best of both worlds.

Besides coding, what else do you use your computer for? If you use it for media consumption, gaming, video editing, or graphics work, you may have additional requirements when choosing a monitor that we don’t include in this roundup.

I consulted reviews and roundups by industry professionals and programmers, then collated an initial list of 49 monitors. I specifically included reviews with actual test results from a wide range of monitors, including RTINGS.com and The Wirecutter. I also found DisplaySpecifications.com and DisplayLag.com helpful sources of information.

I’ve only included monitors that achieved a four-star consumer rating in our roundup. Where possible, these ratings were given by hundreds or thousands of reviewers.

After considering user reviews, our initial list of 49 monitors now includes just the 22 models listed above. I compared each to the list of requirements listed in the previous section and came up with a list of eleven finalists. From there, it was easy to select the best monitor for each category.

It"s common in many offices to see employees with two monitors sitting side-by-side on their desks. Multiple monitors can be useful for staying up to date with data displayed -- often in real-time -- on one screen, and more routine tasks like email and word processing on a second display. Creative users often like to view video and graphics files at full size on a dedicated display, while editing apps and other tools are available on a neighboring display. And some people just need two monitors for two computers, perhaps using a laptop and a desktop PC side-by-side.

But why have two monitors on your desk, when you can just have one? The latest trend in business monitors is for "multitasking" monitors -- large displays that provide enough room to fit several applications or windows on-screen at the same time. If you"re working from home like nearly half of office workers are, you"ll want a monitor that offers a wide view without the clutter of two monitors.

These versatile displays may include additional features, like the ability to create picture-in-picture (PiP) effects, where you concentrate on a primary app that"s displayed in a larger window, while a smaller secondary window lets you keep an eye on information like share prices or emails. Some modern monitors also offer split-screen effects -- also known as picture-by-picture (PbP) -- that allow two computers to share a single screen.

These features work best on larger displays, and the new generation of multitasking monitors generally starts at 32 inches, going all the way up to 49 inches. Even so, these large displays can still take up far less space than a pair of 27-inch screens sitting together on your desk (especially if you"re working from a makeshift office at home).

Samsung promotes the Neo G9 as a high-end gaming monitor, with a high-end specification and price to match. However, this 49-inch curved display works well for more down to earth applications, too. The Neo G9 is referred to as "DQHD" -- that"s dual-QHD, or the equivalent of having two 27-inch monitors with 2560x1440 resolution sitting side by side. That gives you plenty of room to view multiple documents and windows on screen at the same time, so you can work on a spreadsheet or presentation and check your emails, newsfeed and share price updates all at the same time.

The curved screen fills your entire field of view so you can immerse yourself in your work with no distractions, and Samsung"s Quantum Mini-LED technology provides an ultra-smooth 240Hz refresh rate and HDR2000 to provide a sharp, detailed image with bold colors and strong contrast. The display also supports 125% of the sRGB color standard, and 92% of Adobe RGB, so it"ll be useful for a variety of design and graphics applications as well as more routine office work (and gaming).

You can also use the Neo G9 with two devices at the same time, such as a laptop and desktop PC together, and it has a Picture-By-Picture mode that splits the screen in half, so that your two PCs can work side-by-side on the same screen. There"s also a Picture-In-Picture mode that lets you focus most of the screen on one device with the other device displayed in a smaller window in one corner. Other features include both DisplayPort and two HDMI ports for connecting your PCs, two USB ports for your office accessories, and an audio connector for headphones or a set of external speakers.

Acer"s XR range of ultra-wide curved monitors is partly aimed at gamers and video enthusiasts, but also includes features such as picture-in-picture (PiP) and picture-by-picture (PbP) that will allow knowledge workers and power users to connect two computers and view images from both at the same time. The ultra-wide 21:9 aspect ratio is also good for viewing multiple documents and windows.

For video connections, there are two HDMI inputs and DisplayPort in and out, along with two USB 3.0 ports for peripherals. It"s worth noting, though, that the XR382CQK is not a true 4K display, as its unconventional 21:9 aspect ratio has a resolution of 3840 by 1600 (110.9ppi), rather than standard 16:9 3840 by 2160. There are also reports in Acer"s support forum suggesting that Macs don"t take kindly to that aspect ratio for some reason.

BenQ is best-known for affordable monitors and projectors, but it has also moved into creative markets with its DesignVue range of monitors. At $1,199.99, the PD3220U isn"t the cheapest 4K display available, but the 31.5-inch screen provides plenty of room for graphics and video editing and supports 100% of the sRGB color space, as well as 95% of the DCI-P3 standard used in the film industry.

There are two HDMI ports, one DisplayPort, and two Thunderbolt 3 ports, along with a USB hub that provides three USB 3.1 ports. BenQ also provides a "puck" -- a small dial that plugs into the display and allows you to control the on-screen menu system and other functions.

If you want to multitask, you can connect two computers to the display and use the picture-in-picture (PiP) and picture-by-picture (PbP) features to share the screen. You can also rotate the screen by 90-degrees to switch into portrait mode. The PD3220U even includes a built-in KVM switch that lets you share the keyboard, video and mouse between two connected computers. And, if the price or size of the PD3220U is a little over the top, then there"s a 27-inch model for $1,099.99.

Screens bigger than 27 inches used to be something of a luxury -- a status symbol for financial executives, for example. But widespread remote working has changed all that, and increased demand for larger displays has helped to bring prices down. Dell"s new S3221QS is one of the most affordable 31.5-inch displays we"ve seen so far.

There are two HDMI ports and one DisplayPort, and the S3221QS provides a split-screen mode that allows you to use the screen with two computers at the same time. There"s also a picture-in-picture (PiP) mode that uses most of the screen for your main computer, while the image from a second device is displayed in a small window down in one corner. Stereo speakers provide audio output, and there are two USB 3.0 ports for your keyboard, mouse or other accessories.

Unveiled at CES in January 2021, the latest addition to Dell"s UltraSharp range is an impressive all-rounder that is suitable for a wide range of applications.

The UltraSharp 38 U3821DW isn"t the biggest monitor in the range, but its 37.5-screen inch offers near-4K resolution (3840 x 1600, 110.9ppi) with a 21:9 wide-screen aspect ratio that"s ideal for juggling multiple apps and windows on screen at once. It supports 100% of the sRGB color standard, so it works for a wide range of graphics and design applications. It also supports 95% of the DCI-P3 standard for video editing, and while it lacks the true 4K resolution that broadcast professionals will require, the UltraSharp 38 U3821DW will still be more than adequate for editing video for presentations and streaming content.

We very much liked the Philips 329P9H that we reviewed back in 2019, but that model was fairly expensive for a 32-inch display (and doesn"t currently seem to be available in the US). The newer 346B1C provides a more affordable alternative for office work, priced at a competitive $538.

The 346B1C steps up to an even larger 34-inch display, although the low price means that it can"t offer true 4K resolution. Even so, the 3440-by-1440 resolution (109.7dpi) and wide-screen 21:9 aspect ratio provide plenty of room for running multiple apps side-by-side. It also has a 100Hz refresh rate, anti-glare coating, and low-blue light mode to ease eye strain while you"re working. The display supports 119% of the sRGB color standard, and 90% of Adobe RGB, so it"s well suited to graphics work and editing photos.

The 346B1C is well connected too, with USB-C, HDMI and DisplayPort for video input, along with a three-port USB hub and a KVM switch that will allow you to connect two computers and share a single keyboard and mouse.

Philips makes a number of curved monitors that are designed for gaming and video, but its top-of-the-range 499P9H is aimed at the B2B sector -- particularly financial institutions such as banks and trading floors, where multi-display setups are very common.

The curved design is intended to occupy your entire field of vision, offering "optimal ocular comfort" by eliminating distractions so you can immerse yourself in a world of data. The 48.8-inch display provides 5,120-by-1,440 resolution (109ppi) with the same ultra-wide 32:9 aspect ratio found in similar 49-inch displays (which can be troublesome for Mac users, unfortunately).

But, like Philips" more modestly sized range of "docking monitors", the 499P9H is packed with useful connectivity features, including two HDMI ports and one DisplayPort, as well as a USB-C port that can handle data, video and laptop charging.

There"s also a built-in KVM switch that allows you to control two computers with a single mouse and keyboard, and a "multiview" feature that provides a split-screen option for viewing two computers on-screen at the same time. The Philips 499P9H even has a webcam for video conferencing, and Gigabit Ethernet for connecting to a wired network.

Samsung"s latest M7-series monitor, the 32M7OA, is designed for multitasking, and well-suited for both working and playing at home. Described as a "do it all screen", the M7 provides a 32-inch monitor with 4K resolution (3840 x 2160, 137.7dpi) that can run a variety of office and productivity software. Samsung doesn"t mention the level of support for Adobe RGB or sRGB color standards, so the 32M70A won"t be the best choice for professional-level graphics or video work, but it"s hard to complain when this versatile display costs just $349.99.

The 32M70A scores in other areas too, with impressive connectivity features including two HDMI ports and a USB-C port. Built-in Wi-Fi (802.11ac, Wi-Fi 5) allows the M7 to act as a kind of remote terminal for editing MS Office documents that are stored in the cloud, and there"s Bluetooth 4.2 support too. And when you"ve finished work, the 32M70A includes Samsung"s Smart Hub that effectively turns it into a smart TV for streaming Netflix, HBO and other video services. Support for Apple"s AirPlay lets this multi-faceted monitor stream audio and video from Apple devices, too.

HP"s U32 isn"t as large or fully featured as some of its more expensive wide-screen rivals, but it gets all the basics right, and provides an attractive 4K display that is suitable for a wide range of tasks. The IPS display provides full 4K resolution of 3840x2160, with HDR400 to produce a bright, colorful image, and a blue-light filter to reduce eyestrain when you"re working.

The screen of the U32 is actually 31.5 inches in size, but that"s still plenty of room to view multiple documents and windows on screen, or to perform detailed photo or video editing. It also supports 99% of the sRGB color standard, as well as 98% of the DCI-P3 standard used for video editing, so it"ll be a good choice for designers, vloggers and other content creators. And, unlike some of its larger rivals, the U32 also allows you to pivot the screen, switching between horizontal (landscape) mode and upright (portrait) mode, depending on the type of work you"re doing.