samsung lcd panel replacement factory

We are often asked by technicians buying spare parts from us whether there is that much difference between Samsung"s original AMOLED screens and aftermarket alternatives, including, for example, OEM OLED displays. Is it worth investing in branded parts or is a cheaper option sufficient?

The dilemma about the type of screen arises, especially if the original one breaks and you need to replace it with a new part. If you hunt around for a replacement display, you"ll quickly find that the original Samsung AMOLED versions are quite expensive. On the other hand, OEM OLED displays can be had for considerably more affordable prices. So, in collaboration with our engineers, we decided to bring you the answer to the question of whether or not the higher investment is worth it.

In terms of sunlight readability, the Samsung OEM display is almost as good as the original. To the naked eye, you will not notice a drop in brightness, color, or resolution.

Many users are concerned that they will lose some of the original functionality of the device when they replace the original screen with an OEM one. There is nothing to worry about, as the OEM quality Samsung OLED displays retain all the features, including fingerprint reading.

Perhaps the most obvious difference between the original Samsung display and the aftermarket OLED alternative is the size of the bezels. To some extent, the bezel on some OEM screens is visibly larger, so the look of the phone changes. However, the functionality remains intact. However, it should be noted that it all depends on the quality of the replacement part. Cheaper versions have fairly wide bezels, but if you invest in a more expensive alternative, the difference won"t be as noticeable.

When buying aftermarket displays, it"s important to note that they are made by companies that don"t have access to technology as advanced as Samsung’s. Therefore,their quality is significantly lower, which is also reflected in their durability. Of course, it all depends on the OEM manufacturer of the part. However, in the case of aftermarket displays, we"ve long seen more complaints than with originals, which are usually trouble-free and you can count on them to last a long time.

Screen For Samsung ChromeBook 2 XE500C12 XE500C12-K01US BA59-04056A BA59-04177A LCD LED 11.6" Screen Display Panel Replacement WXGA HDPart Number: B116XTN02.3

Screen For Samsung ChromeBook 3 XE500C13 XE501C13 XE500C13-K01US XE500C13-K02US XE500C13-K03US XE500C13-K05US XE500C13-S01US XE501C13-K02US LCD LED 11.6" Screen Display Panel Replacement WXGA HDPart Number: B116XTN02.3

HuiZhou ChuFangxinyu, Technology co was founded in 2007,we are a solution provider for all kind of LCD displays regarding Media player, android/window display, video wall. We mainly engaged in the development, design, production, sale and service of LCD products for industrial and OEM application.We offer both hardware and software supports. Our main products are LCD kits,LCD/LED monitor/TV;Advertising machine ,Open Frame Monitors,Panel PC; Our product range has been enlarged. Our products can be widely used in OEM Application, Design Engineering, Sale, Information, Industrial Automation, Security, Hospitality, Kiosk, Home Automation, Gaming Machines, ATM/Banking, Service, Testing Equipment and Monitoring, Embedded Application, Automobiles and many other industrial applications by Hobbyists, Brokers and Resellers. Our products have been exported to Germany, the UK, the USA, Italy, Australia and many other countries and regions.

Boojae Professional QC teams, Test Each LCD Display and Check Appearance Carefully Before Shipment, to Make Sure Each Items Perfect When Arrive Customer’s Hand.

Boojae offers Samsung Lcd Replacement with high quality, fast shipping and competitive prices on Samsung Note 9 LCD display, please contact us via email:

LCD screen display, Touch screen, Front glass, Flex cable, Spare Parts, Bezel Tape, Battery, Charger, Cable, Handsfree, all items needed for cellular refurbishing and Repairing.

Glass Lens, OCA Adhesive, LCD Flex PCB, Touch Flex PCB,ACF Adhesive, POL Film, Backlight, Refurbish Tools, Machine,all items needed for Smartphone Broken Lcd refurbishment.

As a buyer of phone parts, you want to look for the best quality items and great service, Boojae is an experienced Samsung LCD replacement supplier, understand and customize our products and services to fit your needs.

Samsung may have found a way to strike a hefty blow to the United States’ burgeoning right to repair movement. It has approached the International Trade Commission (ITC), requesting an investigation into the importation of third-party OLED displays for independent repair stores. And if the ITC finds in Samsung’s favor it would, in the words of Louis Rossmann (who published the text of the complaint), “fire a kill shot on the entire repair industry.”

Put simply, Samsung’s claim says that it creates AMOLED displays for mobile devices, and that those displays are covered by a number of patents. But factories in China (and elsewhere) are, according to Samsung, churning out similar screens that infringe upon those patents. And that these screens are often imported by third-party repair businesses in the US as a cheaper option than buying authorized parts directly from, in this case, Samsung.

Several businesses are named in Samsung’s complaint, including MobileSentrix, Injured Gadgets and DFW Cellphone & Parts. Many offer wholesale parts and equipment to other repair companies, as well as their own over-the-counter repair service. Samsung wants the ITC to issue orders blocking the importation of these replacement display parts at the border. It has also requested that the named companies be ordered to stop importing, selling or using the products in question.

Now, Samsung is well within its right to protect its intellectual property, even if it’s going about it in a very interesting way. Rather than address the violating factories directly by seeking remedy where those businesses operate, it’s opting instead to block imports into the US. Given the cavalier manner that foreign IP is treated in some parts of the world, it may be easier to go after the customer than it is to attack the suppliers. Samsung’s lawyers did not respond to our requests for comment at the time of publication.

If Samsung’s request is successful, it could prevent large volumes of third-party OLED displays from being imported to the US. This would have consequences for the small and medium-sized repair businesses that have grown up around repairing broken smartphone screens. It would also funnel significantly more people toward Samsung’s network of authorized service centers.

Few individuals are willing to speak on the record concerning the present state of Android device repair for fear of souring already-strained supplier relationships. We heard from multiple sources that the perpetually under-fire third-party Apple repair ecosystem is luxurious compared to its Android equivalent. One individual, who asked not to be named, said it was often difficult to source replacement parts for Android handsets, which regularly cost more than those for equivalent Apple products.

Another said that standalone Android repair businesses often struggle to stay afloat since they have to charge higher prices for display replacement. And many customers, when shown the potential cost, prefer to ditch their device in favor of replacing it outright. (We noted, too, that on Samsung’s US cracked display support page, the first option in the list is to upgrade your phone rather than opting for a screen replacement.)

In its case to the ITC, Samsung says that it has “sufficient manufacturing capacity” to “assure demand is met for OLED displays as replacement,” which are “supplied through authorized channels.” We could not contact anyone inside Samsung’s authorized repair channels for comment, but one independent repairer who claimed knowledge of the situation said that wasn’t necessarily the case. They believe that Samsung repairers often face long wait times for replacement parts, and that the company often can’t fulfill demand quickly enough.

The Repair Association and US Public Interest Research Group issued a joint submission to the ITC on January 12th, which was shared with Engadget. It said Samsung was behaving in a manner contrary to the US’ present push to reduce the proliferation of e-waste. They added the move was likely anti-competitive and designed to box out independent repair technicians. And that, if Samsung is concerned about patent infringement, it should seek to negotiate with the infringing factories directly or propose “fair and reasonable” licensing terms.

When contacted, the ITC said that it did not comment on ongoing matters, and it will likely be some time before we learn its decision. Rossmann, in a YouTube video posted to his channel, added that this may not just affect Samsung displays, but also any OLED display supplied by Samsung. Which includes a number of displays for iOS devices, given that Samsung Display reportedly supplies 70 percent of all screens for iPhones. Which means that, if the ITC interprets this in the broadest possible terms, the right to repair movement may be in for a long battle.