iphone se 2020 lcd screen free sample

Use our “Get an Estimate” tool to review potential costs if you get service directly from Apple. The prices shown here are only for screen repair. If your iPhone needs other service, you’ll pay additional costs.

If you go to another service provider, they can set their own fees, so ask them for an estimate. For service covered by AppleCare+, your fee per incident will be the same regardless of which service provider you choose.

Your country or region offers AppleCare+ for this product. Screen repair (front) is eligible for coverage with a fee by using an incident of accidental damage from handling that comes with your AppleCare+ plan.

The Apple Limited Warranty covers your iPhone and the Apple-branded accessories that come in the box with your product against manufacturing issues for one year from the date you bought them. Apple-branded accessories purchased separately are covered by the Apple Limited Warranty for Accessories. This includes adapters, spare cables, wireless chargers, or cases.

We guarantee our service, including replacement parts, for 90 days or the remaining term of your Apple warranty or AppleCare plan, whichever is longer. This is in addition to your rights provided by consumer law.

Replacement equipment that Apple provides as part of the repair or replacement service may contain new or previously used genuine Apple parts that have been tested and pass Apple functional requirements.

Cell Phone Parts└ Cell Phones, Smart Watches & AccessoriesAll CategoriesAntiquesArtBabyBooks & MagazinesBusiness & IndustrialCameras & PhotoCell Phones & AccessoriesClothing, Shoes & AccessoriesCoins & Paper MoneyCollectiblesComputers/Tablets & NetworkingConsumer ElectronicsCraftsDolls & BearsMovies & TVEntertainment MemorabiliaGift Cards & CouponsHealth & BeautyHome & GardenJewelry & WatchesMusicMusical Instruments & GearPet SuppliesPottery & GlassReal EstateSpecialty ServicesSporting GoodsSports Mem, Cards & Fan ShopStampsTickets & ExperiencesToys & HobbiesTravelVideo Games & ConsolesEverything Else

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

Grab an affordable iPhone SE (2020) LCD and Digitizer Screen in Black (Aftermarket). Fix your broken iPhone 8 for a great price with this replacement. If your 4.7- inch screen is shattered, our part will make your phone look brand new. If you want to watch videos again, without the dead pixels, our LCD will solve that problem. All of our iPhone 8 parts are factory tested and guaranteed to fit your phone perfectly.

(This part does not include the home button, front-facing camera, proximity sensor, earpiece speaker, or the LCD shield plate. You"ll need to transfer these parts from your broken iPhone SE screen to your new screen.)

We have an email and live chat support to help you. If you are having trouble with a repair or have a question about a part, just contact us. Check out our free iPhone 8 Take Apart Repair Guide to help you out even more.

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

It keeps the SE series design language firmly rooted in 2017 – that was the year Apple launched the iPhone 8, the design of which Apple employed for 2020"s SE 2, and has stuck with for this new phone.

In 2020, Apple took that chassis and upgraded the CPU to an A13 Bionic, the rear camera to a 12MP wide, and introduced "monocular depth estimation," which improved Portrait Mode photography for the front and rear cameras. It was a nifty AI-infused trick that worked like a charm on faces, but nothing else.

All those things you loved from the iPhone SE (2020) remain in the iPhone SE (2022). There"s been no change to the thin and light body, no reintroduction of the 3.5mm headphone jack, no removal of the Touch ID. The Liquid Retina display is untouched. The cameras - a 12MP rear and 7MP front - are the same, too.

The difference, and it is bigger than you think, is the new A15 Bionic, the very same Apple Silicon you"ll find in Apple"s iPhone 13 line. It"s a powerful mobile CPU that - to date - beats even Qualcomm"s latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 CPU (in Geekbench scores).

It"s a lot of power and headroom for a tiny, 4.7-inch screen smartphone that doesn"t even have a depth sensor on the front. Still, the A15 Bionic is up for anything, from shooting and editing 4K videos to playing intense action games like Call of Duty and PUBG.

The A15 is a system on a chip, which means the graphics processing is integrated, and that in turn means better image processing. Even though it still has the same camera as its predecessor, the iPhone SE (2022) is capable of timelapse night photography (though you"ll need a tripod).

Inevitably though, there are limits to what"s on offer here compared with Apple"s flagship phones. All the A15 Bionic-sporting iPhone 13 phones support the new Cinematic mode video (bokeh-effect), but there"s no such video control on the new iPhone SE.

Speaking of things missing from this new phone. The iPhone SE (2022) follows Apple"s new packing strategy: No more power adapter or wired earbuds in the box.

From an environmental perspective, this makes a lot of sense. It is unfortunate, though, that the price rose $30 to $429 at the same time Apple pulled these accessories. Accounting for inflation, however, the price might be considered roughly the same as it was two years ago. I don"t expect that argument to fly everywhere.

Battery life is 12 hours, which is notable considering the more powerful CPU and eye-brow singeing 5G connectivity, but it"s not in the same league as the handsets in the iPhone 13 family.

It"s hard to wholeheartedly recommend the iPhone SE 2022, when you can spend a little more for the iPhone 13 mini, which has a bigger, brighter, and shaper Super Retina XDR OLED screen, another camera, Face ID, and a fresher design (and you can pick up some of the lower-end iPhone 11 and iPhone 12 options for a similar premium).

Even so, there is still something charming about the look and feel of Apple"s aging iPhone design. And getting all that performance and 5G for under $500 is nothing to sneeze at either.

For Apple devotees, the brand can set the pricing and options agenda for its iPhones, safe in the knowledge that it doesn"t have to engage in a race to the bottom against lower-end Androids.

The iPhone SE (2022) carries on that tradition in mostly fine form. However, it changes nothing aesthetically about the last model but builds on it with Apple"s latest chip and mobile connectivity technology - whether that"s enough for you is a personal decision.

However if you’re looking for a new iPhone that offers and costs more, allow us to point you to theiPhone 13 series, which comprises the iPhone 13 itself, theiPhone 13 mini (the iPhone SE consistently outsells the mini line), theiPhone 13 Pro and theiPhone 13 Pro Max.

The iPhone SE (2022) has gotten a price hike over its predecessor to $429 / £419 / AU$719, but it still qualifies as Apple"s cheapest 5G phone. The iPhone 13 mini starts at $699 / £679 / AU$1,199 and the iPhone 12 mini starts at $599.

However, it is more than a little frustrating that Apple insists on offering a phone with just 64GB of storage to start. The phone shoots up to 4K, 60fps video. Where are all those files supposed to go? Apple"s iPhone 13 line now starts at 128GB across the board. That"s the standard Apple should"ve followed here. The issue is compounded because the iPhone SE (2022) tops out at 256 GB of storage ($579 / £569 / AU$969), though there"s also a 128GB option for $479 / £469 / AU$799.

The previous iPhone SE started at $399 / £389 / AU$679, and while asking for a little more for a 5G phone with the newest processor is not a big ask, consumers will notice the packaging is a bit smaller and lighter. The environment will thank Apple, but some consumers might be miffed that there are no longer wired earbuds and power adapters included with the device. That"s the same for the iPhone 13 series, but the omission still might sting for budget-conscious iPhone consumers who now have to buy the accessories separately.

There is familiar and then there is familiar.Apple"s iPhone SE (2022) is such a well-worn look that I instinctually took to it, even though I know it"s not a look that"s "in" right now.

The glass back and front are perfectly smooth, and it"s almost quaint to see a single relatively tiny, 12MP wide-angle camera on the back in this age of ever-expanding camera blocks. The sapphire glass lens cover"s distance from the backplane can be measured in a millimeter (maybe two).

The front features the aging 1344 x 750 pixel Liquid Retina Display, which looks great on its own, but literally pales in comparison to, for instance, the iPhone 13 mini"s 5.4-inch edge-to-edge Super Retina XDR display OLED screen.

Below all that is our old friend, the Touch ID home button. We"ve been living with Face ID, home-button-free iPhones for so long, that our reintroduction was a bit bumpy. I literally forgot how to use an iPhone with a home button to start with, although, it was a little like riding a bike, and I soon got back in the Touch ID groove. I remembered how much I liked the way the button felt as it read my fingerprint or faked a physical button press with expert haptics. It"s time for the Touch ID button die, but it serves its purpose well here on the iPhone SE.

There is no 3.5mm headphone jack on the phone, but it does have a Lightning charging port, which could accommodate a pair of Lightning of earbuds. Those aren"t included, sadly, but the phone does work perfectly with wireless AirPods if you have them. There"s also a USB-C to Lightning port charging cable in the box.

If you"re upgrading from an iPhone 5S the iPhone SE"s 4.7-inch screen might feel like an upgrade, but in a world of monster-sized displays, 2,000,000:1 contrast ratios, and adaptive refresh rates, its 60Hz LCD luster might feel out of step.

Comparing the SE"s display to the best screens out there seemed pointless, though - if you want more, you will pay more (on any platform and from any handset manufacturer). In isolation though, the display looks good - across a wide variety of tasks from photography and videography, to web browsing, gameplay, and video, it looked good.

I"ve seen iPhone 8 handsets drop to the floor and crack faster than you can say "screen protector," and while you might assume that the iPhone SE, which shares much of the 8"s DNA, would be similarly inclined, but might be wrong.

Both the front and back of the iPhone SE (2022) are built from the same glass that"s on the back of all iPhone 13 phones. Sadly though, the SE doesn"t get Apple"s Ceramic Shield technology, so if you buy this phone, it still makes sense to spring for that silicone case.

Our phones are increasingly also our cameras these days, and any handset that skimps in this area is asking for trouble. Even though the iPhone SE (2022) is graced with just two lenses that are the same as those on the SE 2020, it manages to take photos that are pleasing to the eye, color-accurate, and often beautiful.

The rear 12MP, f/1/8 wide lens is now backed by the A15 Bionic"s image processing and supported by Smart HDR 4 and Deep Fusion (introduced with the A13 Bionic and present in the last iPhone SE).

I took the phone out to test the cameras, and was pleased not only by the image quality they delivered but with the speed. There"s optical image stabilization which meant I didn"t always have to plant my feet and stand perfectly still to grab a good-looking shot (video is supported by optical image stabilization, as well).

In Portrait mode you can adjust a faux-aperture setting to control the depth of field effect, throwing more of less of the background behind your subject out of focus. I was a bit frustrated, however, that the iPhone SE Portrait Mode photography is still limited to people - you can"t shoot bokeh shots of dogs, plants, or anything else without a face.

The camera does support all the other expected photos styles. including panorama and time lapse - and new here is Night Timelapse, which you can use with a tripod, though there"s no support for Apple"s Night Mode still photography.

On the video front, the iPhone SE can shoot all the way up to 4K 60fps. Footage looks good on the phone"s screen, although, some resolution is obviously lost in the 1334x750 display.

The quality of Portrait Mode for both the front and back camera is better than what we experienced on the iPhone SE (2020). It"s now capable of picking up tiny details, like wisps of hair, and carefully separating them from the blurred background. I found virtually no anomalies - blurred details that should have been sharp, and vice versa - that ruined the effect.

Apple"s total control over its manufacturing processes and component lines makes it easy to take one cutting-edge element from its newest products and fit it neatly into a design it cooked up more than three years ago.

The A15 Bionic is Apple"s most powerful mobile processor, and putting it into the iPhone SE"s tiny frame is akin to strapping rocket motors to a bicycle.

To be clear, this is not some stunted or throttled version of Apple"s chip. Geekbench 5 numbers put the iPhone SE (2022) on equal footing with the A15 Bionic in the iPhone 13 mini. It"s worth noting that the phone now has 4GB of RAM, which will certainly help with performance.

The iPhone SE (2022) welcomes the SE line into the iPhone 5G family. Again, the approach is full-boat, with no skimping on power or performance. This meant we could turn off WiFi, download apps, play multi-player games like Call of Duty, and stream HD Netflix without hesitation.

In some places, I had to console myself with just LTE speeds. Still, it"s kind of wild to have such an affordable iPhone with such impressive powers of connectivity.

While I don"t know the size of the iPhone SE battery (Apple never announces mAh), it"s a fair bet that it hasn"t changed much since the iPhone SE (2020). Even so, I expected some serious battery fall-off from the more powerful A15 Bionic and that tasty new 5G.

When it"s time to recharge, you can do so with the included cable at 18W (go find your own USB-C power adapter!) or by placing it on a Qi-compatible charging base. The phone does not support Apple"s new MagSafe chargers.

Big is not youThis is not only Apple"s joint-thinnest phone, it"s basically the same weight as the iPhone 13 mini but without the edges. We love holding this device.

You want a great screenThe iPhone SE (2022) has a 4.7-inch display that reminds us of bygone days and not necessarily in a good way. It"s too small and struggles in direct sunlight. If you want big and bold, this is not for you.

You want touch-free unlockingTouch ID means what it says, you must put a digit on the button to unlock the phone. If you want Face ID for not much more, look to the iPhone 11.

You want more lensesThe photography here is good but limited. No zoom, no ultra-wide, no Portrait Mode shots of your dog.First reviewed March 2022Apple iPhone SE (2022): Price Comparison

When you buy through our links, Insider may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more.Apple"s $400 iPhone SE is powered by the same processor inside the iPhone 11 and 11 Pro, making it a compelling option for those on a budget that don"t want to sacrifice performance.

It has largely the same design as Apple"s iPhone 8 from 2017, meaning it"s the only iPhone to come with a Touch ID home button and a smaller 4.7-inch screen.

That being said, there are plenty of similarly-priced Android competitors that have more to offer when it comes to camera features, screen size, and quality.

The iPhone SE may look very familiar to anyone who has purchased an iPhone in 2016 or 2017, but there are plenty of characteristics that make it feel much different than any ordinary iPhone launch.

For starters, at $400 it"s significantly cheaper than any other iPhones Apple currently sells. It also debuted in April even though Apple typically releases new iPhones in the fall. Plus, it lacks the edge-to-edge screen design that"s become a hallmark of Apple"s smartphones in recent years — even on cheaper models, like the $600 iPhone XR.

And, while Apple typically holds flashy press events to introduce new products, especially iPhones, it rolled out the iPhone SE quietly online — a necessity given that the COVID-19 pandemic is making it impossible to assemble large groups.

That"s all fitting for the iPhone SE, which after all is designed to be a "special edition" smartphone from Apple. Unlike last year"s iPhone 11 family and the rumored upcoming iPhone 12, the iPhone SE isn"t meant to introduce attention-grabbing new features and technological advancements. Rather, it"s designed to carry the message that there"s a new iPhone for everyone, even those who can"t afford to spend $700 or more on a new smartphone.

The iPhone SE"s biggest asset is its A13 Bionic processor, the same powerful chip that drives the iPhone 11 and 11 Pro. That comes wrapped in a 4.7-inch design that looks and feels much like the iPhone 8, meaning yes, the iPhone SE is the first new iPhone to come with a Touch ID home button since 2017"s iPhone 8.

While the iPhone SE certainly has a lot going for it, the phone is launching at a time when there"s more competition than ever in the market for affordable smartphones. Some of those devices are even more feature-rich than the iPhone SE, particularly when it comes to the camera and display, even if they may not be quite as powerful.

Compared to the iPhone 11 and 2018"s iPhone XS, the iPhone SE looks vintage. It"s the most compact iPhone in years, and after spending the last several months using the iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro, it"s a welcome throwback.

In terms of its size, weight, and appearance, the iPhone SE is nearly identical to the iPhone 8. The biggest differences are in the iPhone SE"s color choices and the positioning of the Apple logo on the back of the device.

It"s an aesthetic that those in need of an upgrade who are reluctant to give up their iPhone 6S or iPhone 7 will surely appreciate. At a time when smartphones have become increasingly large and at times unwieldy, the iPhone SE is refreshingly simple. It feels much easier to manage with one hand, and legacy iPhone owners also won"t have to worry about learning new swipe gestures to replace the home button.

As much as I enjoy unlocking my iPhone just by looking at it, I"ve really come to appreciate having Touch ID again. Being able to rest my finger on the iPhone"s home button to unlock it sometimes felt more convenient than using Face ID.

For example, Touch ID allows me to quickly unlock my phone to see more details about a notification without picking it up, unlike Face ID. At a time when many people like myself are wearing protective masks and coverings over their face before leaving the house, being able to quickly access my phone without facial recognition has been very helpful.

My only complaint about the iPhone SE"s design is that it feels a bit antiquated. I love the convenience of having a smaller iPhone with Touch ID, but the chunky bezels above and below the SE"s display do feel a bit outdated. Other smartphone makers, like Samsung, have launched devices around the same price as the iPhone SE that have larger, borderless screens.

The iPhone SE has a 4.7-inch screen with a 1,344 x 750 resolution and Apple"s True Tone for adjusting colors based on surrounding lighting just like the iPhone 8. Like every other iPhone that Apple currently sells except for the 11 Pro and 11 Pro Max, the iPhone SE"s screen is made from an LCD panel rather than an OLED display. OLED screens typically offer better contrast and deeper black tones, but they"re usually found on more expensive devices.

Apple"s iPhone SE may be tiny, but it packs a lot of power. The phone runs on Apple"s A13 Bionic processor, the same chip found inside the $700 iPhone 11, $1,000 iPhone 11 Pro, and $1,100 iPhone 11 Pro Max. Apple says the chipset is built for real-time video and photo analysis and can perform 1 trillion operations per second.

The A13 Bionic is the biggest part of what makes the iPhone SE so appealing. It means the iPhone SE is equipped to handle almost everything the iPhone 11 and 11 Pro can, except for the features and applications that take advantage of the multi-lens cameras on those pricier iPhones. That"s important because it suggests the iPhone SE won"t quickly feel outdated since it runs on Apple"s newest mobile processor.

This is what gives the iPhone SE a big advantage over some well-received Android rivals. Google"s $400 Pixel 3a, for example, earned praise for the fact that it brought one of the Pixel 3"s most compelling features — Night Mode, which takes clear photos in the dark — at an unusually low price. But, it runs on an older Qualcomm processor from 2018 that was designed for less expensive smartphones. The same can be said for Motorola"s Moto Z4, which is currently available for $400 and offers a range of appealing features, like a border-free screen and 48-megapixel camera. That phone, too, runs on an older Qualcomm processor built for relatively inexpensive phones.

The iPhone SE certainly offered snappy performance during my experience with it. It is able to render a 4K one-minute video clip in iMovie in about 18 seconds, unsurprisingly beating the more than 2-year-old iPhone 8, which takes roughly 45 seconds. What does surprise me though, is that the iPhone SE manages to render this clip even faster than the $1,400 Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra does when exporting a 4K clip of the same length. Samsung"s phone, by comparison, takes about 31 seconds.

Another area in which I noticed the iPhone SE"s more powerful performance was when running certain augmented reality apps. While I don"t notice much of a difference between the iPhone SE and iPhone 8 with some apps, like the AR storytelling app Wonderscope or the science education app Atlas, the iPhone SE is much faster while functioning as a digital tape measure. The iPhone SE is able to detect new surfaces and adapt instantly when using Apple"s Measure app, whereas the iPhone 8 sometimes struggles to adjust immediately as I pan the phone"s camera around my apartment.

The iPhone SE seems more powerful on paper as well. It earned higher scores on the Geekbench 5 benchmark than the iPhone 8 and Google Pixel 4. Geekbench runs a series of tests that claim to measure a processor"s single-core and multi-core performance to evaluate how they hold up during real-world, everyday tasks like checking email and streaming music.

After running the app"s CPU test multiple times, the iPhone SE scored between 1,326 and 1,332 on Geekbench"s test of a single processing core, and between 3,102 and 3,331 on a test that evaluates how multiple processing cores perform. The iPhone 8, by comparison, scored between 921 and 931 on the single core test and between 2,248 and 2,328 on the multi-core test, while the Pixel 4 scored 730 on the single core test and 2,445 on the multi-core version.

The OnePlus 8 Pro and Galaxy S20 Ultra performed roughly the same as and in some cases better than the iPhone SE when it came to the multi-core test. The S20 Ultra, for example, scored between 886 and 907 on the single core test and between 3,301 and 3,282 on the multi-core test, while the OnePlus 8 Pro scored 894 on the single core test and 3,322 on the multi-core test.

The iPhone SE"s camera system is similar to that of the iPhone XR; it has a single 12-megapixel camera and a 7-megapixel selfie camera. The biggest differences between the iPhone SE"s camera and the iPhone XR"s is that the former comes with more lighting effects for Portrait Mode (six versus the XR"s three effects) and a newer version of Apple"s high dynamic range technology.

The iPhone 8 also has a single 12-megapixel camera and a 7-megapixel front camera, but lacks Portrait Mode and Apple"s Smart HDR, a technology that should be better at capturing details, highlights, and shadows.

The iPhone SE takes crisp, colorful photos that in some cases looked superior to those taken with the iPhone 8 and in others seemed about the same. Apple"s top-of-the-line camera on the iPhone 11 Pro, which features a triple-lens 12-megapixel setup, sometimes appears to capture images with better contrast, color, and detail compared to the iPhone SE. But, in other instances, such as when photographing colorful flowers, all three phones capture similar images.

Take a look at the images below, which were shot on the iPhone SE, iPhone 8, and iPhone 11 Pro. You"ll notice the photos taken with the SE and 8 are fairly similar, while the iPhone 11 Pro"s offer a bit more detail, contrast, and slightly bolder colors.

Other than the additional lenses on the iPhone 11 — which features both a wide and ultra-wide lens, and the iPhone 11 Pro — which has wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto lenses —the biggest feature missing from the iPhone SE is Night Mode. As its name implies, this means the iPhone SE isn"t as well equipped to take photos in the dark as the iPhone 11 and 11 Pro, as shown below.

The iPhone SE may not have all the bells and whistles of the iPhone 11 or 11 Pro"s camera. But, it"s more than capable enough for those who just want a phone that can take high-quality photos and don"t necessarily care about the extra flexibility that the 11 and 11 Pro offer.

Still, some low-cost Android phones have more to offer when it comes to camera functionality, like the Pixel 3a, which has Google"s Night Sight technology for taking photos in the dark. Samsung"s $400 Galaxy A51 also has a quad-lens camera with depth, ultra-wide, and macro lenses in addition to the standard wide lens.

During most work days — which entails frequently checking notifications, leaving the screen on for long periods of time, making phone calls, and recording audio on my phone — the iPhone SE lasts from the early morning until the late afternoon or early evening before I have to plug it in. But, on the weekend, when I"m mostly using my phone to occasionally check email and social media, I am able to get through an entire day without having to charge it.

Comparatively, most flagship smartphones I"ve tested, like the iPhone 11 Pro, typically last for more than a day on a single charge. As always, it"s worth noting that the apps you use and the settings you implement on your phone can impact battery life, so results may vary.

The $400 iPhone SE is an ideal choice for Apple devotees looking for a reliable smartphone that won"t break the bank. Since it runs on Apple"s A13 Bionic chip, you won"t have to worry about sacrificing performance or purchasing a smartphone that will soon feel out of date compared to the latest flagship models.

Those who prefer smaller phones, don"t want to spend a lot of money, and aren"t thrilled about giving up their aging iPhone"s Touch ID home button will probably love the SE.

That being said, the budget smartphone market has become increasingly competitive over the last year. Those who aren"t partial to Apple have plenty of compelling Android alternatives at their disposal, some of which offer more camera features and modern edge-to-edge screen designs even if they run on chips that may not be as powerful or new as the A13 Bionic. Google"s Pixel 3a and Samsung"s Galaxy A51 are two such examples.

The iPhone SE doesn"t have a lot of the extras I"ve come to appreciate on Apple"s newer iPhones, like the 11 and 11 Pro"s ultra-wide-angle camera or a borderless screen. But, at $400, it has just about everything you would want from a quality smartphone: a solid camera with Portrait Mode, decent battery life, and compact, attractive design.

Please note: In October 2020, we updated the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Version 4 now includes image preview tests and a wide range of new test scenes as part of our new trustability evaluation which measures the camera’s ability to deliver consistent still image and video quality across all shooting scenarios. We have retested this device using the new version 4 of the test protocol and produced this completely updated review. For more information, please see our article about preview, trustability and other version 4 updates of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.

Launched in April 2020, the iPhone SE (2020) is Apple’s second-generation update of their smaller, cheaper, and popular SE smartphone. It features a 4.7-inch LCD display with IPS technology, and the handset is IP67-rated for splash, dust, and water resistance. It’s not short on power, thanks to Apple’s latest A13 Bionic chip under the hood; it’s available in 64/128/256GB fixed storage capacities, and has a battery that lasts for around 13 hours of video playback.

The rear camera offers a single 12 MP sensor linked to a f/1.8-aperture lens with phase-detection autofocus (PDAF) and optical image stabilization (OIS). There’s no dedicated ultra-wide, bokeh, or zoom cameras, but the iPhone SE offers a 5x digital zoom, and a portrait mode with “advanced bokeh and depth control.” Other features include a True Tone LED flash with slow sync and red-eye correction, lighting controls with six effects, Smart HDR processing, and JPEG as well as Apple’s own space-saving HEIF image format.

For video, the device offers 4K capture at 24/30/60 fps, as well as slo-mo 1080p footage at either 120 or 240 fps. HDR processing is available on video capture up to 30 fps, and you can snap 8K stills while recording 4K video, or capture a time lapse video with stabilization. Video formats include both HEVC and H.264.

Achieving an updated DXOMARK Camera score of 103, Apple’s iPhone SE (2020) improves on its previous score, but remains in the lower half of devices tested under our new protocol. With a Photo score of 108, that ranking holds true across most of our individual test categories, with a couple of notable exceptions. Exposure is mostly accurate, and although dynamic range can be a little limited in high-contrast scenes, it’s mainly acceptable. Similarly, color is generally good, although slight color casts are evident in most conditions, and stronger white balance and color rendering irregularities occur both indoors and in low light.

Autofocus performance remains one of the device’s best attributes, where the iPhone SE (2020) achieves close to the top score thanks to its fast, accurate, and repeatable focusing in all conditions. Texture is good in outdoor images, too, but not outstanding, with low detail evident in indoor and low-light images. Visible noise in all tested conditions is a notable weakness for the iPhone SE (2020), however, and it posts a very low score in this area.

The phone has a middling performance in our night photography evaluation, too. Flash-auto portraits display acceptable exposure, color, and detail on the subject itself, but limited dynamic range means backgrounds are usually underexposed and the results are a bit underwhelming overall. Low-light cityscapes are also a little disappointing. Despite reasonable exposure and color, low detail, ghosting artifacts, as well as very visible noise reduce the overall quality of nightscapes. The device achieves a low ranking for bokeh quality, too, due to inconsistent activation, as well as depth estimation errors and rendering irregularities.

A score of 23 positions the iPhone SE (2020) very low down in our database of Zoom performance. As it’s not possible to capture ultra-wide shots, it posts no score in this category and the device has low capabilities for zoom shots that increase the focal length. It’s best at close range, but as you push magnification further, detail is low in the resulting images, with a coarse noise effect and ringing artifacts also very visible.

The iPhone SE (2020) fares better in our video analysis, where its Video score of 105 is much closer to devices in the top half of our database. Video exposure is a strength, with extended dynamic range outdoors and good brightness indoors. Slight exposure adaptation issues are occasionally visible, and target exposure can be low in low-light conditions, but in good to fair lighting, video exposure is generally pleasing. Video color is usually pleasant, too, particularly outdoors, but warm white balance casts are often visible in all tested conditions. Video autofocus isn’t quite as successful as we observed with stills, and although convergence is often fast, slight refocusing irregularities are often visible.

Video detail is high outdoors, as you can see in the face in the outdoor video below. Noise in low light is again major weakness, however. Temporal noise is very visible on flat areas, which is especially problematic in indoor and low-light conditions, and some noise is usually evident in all conditions. Stabilization is acceptable in static videos, but not very effective while walking, where some residual motion and jello effects are often visible. Flare and judder artifacts aren’t uncommon in videos either.

The iPhone SE (2020) performed reasonably well overall in our new preview category. It’s not quite as accomplished as the iPhone 11 Pro Max, which is currently our top device for preview, but its score of 57 puts the iPhone SE (2020) in joint third place alongside the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. There is some evidence of live HDR processing on the iPhone SE (2020) preview feed, so highlights are reasonably well controlled in high-contrast conditions, with some detail in bright skies, for example. On the other hand, HDR processing and target exposures tend to be more successful in the final image, so what you see in preview is not exactly what you get. It’s better in well-balanced lighting conditions, where there’s good similarity for exposure between preview and capture.

In our analysis of zoom smoothness, the iPhone SE (2020) offers stable performance with smooth exposure and white balance adaptation using pinch zoom. Of course with only one camera, it’s easier for the Apple device to achieve this, so there are no frame jumps or exposure and color irregularities that can be difficult to handle on devices that have to switch lenses while zooming.

Launched in April 2020, the iPhone SE (2020) is Apple’s second-generation update to their smaller, cheaper, and popular SE smartphone. Although slightly larger and heavier than the original SE, it remains diminutive compared to most new smartphones, featuring a 4.7-inch LCD display with IPS technology and 1334×750 pixel resolution.

It’s not short on power, though, thanks to Apple’s latest A13 Bionic chip under the hood; and the new iPhone SE is available in 64/128/256GB fixed storage capacities. It’s also IP67-rated for splash, dust, and water resistance, and Apple says the battery lasts “around” the same as for the iPhone 8, which offers 13 hours of video playback.

For photography, the rear camera offers a single 12MP camera with a f/1.8-aperture lens. The lens features PDAF autofocus and optical image stabilization (OIS). A single camera setup means there’s no dedicated ultra-wide, bokeh, or zoom cameras, but the iPhone SE offers a 5x digital zoom, and a portrait mode with “advanced bokeh and depth control.” Other features include a True Tone LED flash with slow sync and red-eye correction, lighting controls with six effects, Smart HDR processing, and JPEG as well as Apple’s own space-saving HEIF image format.

For video, the device offers 4K capture at 24/30/60fps, as well as slo-mo 1080p footage at either 120 or 240fps. HDR processing is available on video capture up to 30fps, and you can snap 8K stills while recording 4K video, or capture a time lapse video with stabilization. Video formats include both HEVC and H.264.

About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 1600 test images and more than 2 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here.

Achieving an overall DXOMARK Camera score of 101, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) places near the center of our smartphone image quality database. While the budget-friendly Apple device offers comparable quality in many respects to the more expensive iPhone 11, its single camera setup falls short for zoom and bokeh shots compared to our top performers. The lack of an ultra-wide camera is also a disadvantage and is the main difference between it and the iPhone 11.

With a Photo score of 103, the new iPhone SE’s camera does a good job for exposure and color, which are its main strengths. Detail is well preserved in outdoor shots, too.

Exposures are good in most lighting conditions, and excellent dynamic range ensures that high-contrast scenes are nicely exposed, with well-controlled highlights and good recovery of darker areas. Exposure drops off noticeably in low light, however, and although the flash improves detail and exposure in night portraits, generally low exposure and detail, along with high noise, means the iPhone SE (2020) isn’t meant for avid night photography enthusiasts.

A single-camera device is something of a rare beast in the current smartphone market, and the lack of a dedicated depth sensor or tele-lens really starts to show in bokeh and zoom shots.

Shooting in portrait mode, the SE struggles with depth estimation and often blurs objects connected to the subject. Edge artifacts around complex areas such as hair or hands are often visible, too, and the bokeh effect occasionally fails to activate when requested. It’s more successful with simple portraits when the subject is large in the frame, where a subtle but pleasant depth-of-field effect, with well-controlled noise, can make for some nice results.

Detail in the iPhone SE’s zoom shots is low, too. It’s best with just a small amount of pinch zoom in outdoor or bright light conditions, and exposure and color generally hold up very well in zoom shots, too. A significant loss of detail, as well as a noticeable increase in artifacts such as aliasing, ringing, and moiré, occurs when you start pushing the magnification further, with results a long ways behind the top-ranked devices in our database.

Tested and scored at its 4K/30fps setting (which offers the best results), the iPhone SE (2020) is a capable device for video. Video exposure is generally very good, controlling both shadows and highlights well. Color is also very pleasant in most conditions, but underexposure in low light can make color saturation a little flat. The SE avoids seriously distracting color casts, too, but slight white balance inconsistencies are evident under artificial lighting.

The iPhone SE’s 4K capture offers decent detail, particularly in bright light, but it’s not quite as consistent as some of the best 4K devices we’ve tested, with texture rendering dropping off a little indoors, and more noticeably in low light. Noise is well controlled in videos, though, unless you’re shooting in exceptionally dark conditions. Video autofocus is also quick on static subjects, but autofocus tracking could be improved; and although stabilization isn’t perfect, with some global motion evident in static, panning, and walking videos, it’s not terrible.

The Apple iPhone SE (2020) achieves a Photo score of 103, matching older devices such as the Google Pixel 3. Image quality is broadly similar to the iPhone 11 when comparing shots from their respective main cameras. With no dedicated ultra-wide, zoom, or bokeh cameras on the SE, Apple’s latest device is at a disadvantage compared to multi-camera phones. In this section, we take a closer look at how each sub-score was determined and compare the iPhone SE (2020)’s image quality against the Apple iPhone 11 and the Google Pixel 3.

The iPhone SE (2020) achieves a good score for exposure and contrast, which is one of the device’s main strengths. Target exposures are accurate in most lighting conditions and performance is consistent. In our lab analysis we found contrast to be generally excellent, with bright target exposures in simulated indoor and outdoor lighting. It’s not as good in low light as the best performers, however, with some obvious underexposure in very low light.

In our perceptual analysis, the iPhone SE (2020) achieved good scores for indoor and outdoor images. Dynamic range is very wide, and in challenging high-contrast scenes images show good detail in both the highlights and shadows. In this example, you can see the iPhone SE (2020) captures a brighter exposure in the darker areas compared to the iPhone 11 and the Pixel 3, while still maintaining excellent detail in the sky.

Indoors, target exposures remain accurate in most examples and dynamic range is good when there are no people in the picture. And when it detects a face, the iPhone SE (2020) adjusts its target exposure to accurately expose for the subject. So the subject is well exposed in our challenging backlit portrait test, which is great, but dynamic range is limited in this instance and highlight detail in the sky is blown out. Both the iPhone SE and the iPhone produced a more satisfactory picture in this test compared to the Pixel 3, which underexposes the subject.

Color is a nice strength for the iPhone SE (2020), and particularly in outdoor images, color rendering is always pleasant. White balance is slightly warmer in outdoor images compared to those from the iPhone 11, which often display a slight cold or blue color cast; and as a result, colors generally feel a little richer and more pleasing on the SE.

Good color indoors ensures excellent scores for the iPhone SE (2020) in our perceptual analysis for white balance, color rendering, and color uniformity. Even under simulated low-light conditions in the lab, the iPhone SE (2020) maintained accurate white balance and accurate color rendering under a range of artificial light sources.

Autofocus on the Apple iPhone SE (2020) is fast, but our testers encountered some failures in high-contrast or backlit conditions that resulted in out-of-focus images.

In our benchmark lab testing where we defocus the device between shots and leave a short (500ms) or long (2000ms) delay before requesting focus, the iPhone SE performed well, with fast and accurate performance under simulated indoor and outdoor lighting conditions.

In low-light conditions, results were a little mixed but acceptable. Autofocus continued to be very fast in low light, which is great, but the level of measured acutance varied a little bit when leaving only a short delay between shots. All pictures were in sharp focus, so we found no major concerns in the lab, but consistency could be improved for those short-delay shots in low light. Sharpness was more consistent after a long delay, and again, autofocus was quick, but oversharpening is evident in low-light shots, too.

Overall, the texture-versus-noise tradeoff isn’t a key strength for the iPhone SE (2020), especially when compared to top-performing devices with higher-resolution sensors and pixel-binning signal processing. The iPhone SE achieved good results in our lab measurements in all lighting conditions when using a tripod for support, and although the less expensive device isn’t quite as consistent as the iPhone 11 as the light levels dip, it’s not far off.

In our perceptual analysis of outdoor images, detail from the 12MP sensor is acceptable and consistent with the iPhone 11 and the Pixel 3. You can see in this example that edge detail on the railings holds up ok, but very fine details in the leaves of the tree are lost. Some noise is usually visible in darker areas even in outdoor images, too, and although it’s not quite as obvious on the iPhone SE compared to the Pixel 3, those areas of uniform color aren’t as clean as we’d expect from top-performing devices.

Similarly, measurements for visual noise are broadly consistent among our three compared devices, with well-controlled results down to low light at 20 lux and a sharp increase in noise in very low light.

In this high-contrast indoor scene, a blotchy noise effect is visible in the darker areas and edges aren’t well defined. The iPhone 11 offers a very modest improvement, and although the Pixel 3 displays more noise, edge detail is sharper.

Although many of the image quality problems we look out for in our artifacts analysis were visible on the iPhone SE (2020), none were very serious. The main penalties we applied were for visible flare in strongly backlit images, maze or moiré patterns on high frequency areas, and ringing along contrast edges. Flare is only really obvious when shooting directly towards a bright light source, and even then it’s pretty well controlled, as it manages to avoid those large and unsightly vertical or horizontal streaks of light.

A visible loss of sharpness towards the edges is something to be aware of if you’re planning to print images, as detail is often much better in the center on iPhone SE (2020). Similarly, the ringing and maze and moire effects are really evident only at quite close inspection, but they will become more visible when displaying images at large scale or when making prints.

The iPhone SE (2020) is not the device for you if you’re interested in high-quality zoom shots. With no dedicated tele-lens, the device instead applies a digital zoom to the already fairly low-resolution 12MP image, resulting in a noticeable deterioration of detail at all magnifications. As you’d expect, results are best at close range (~2x magnification), where detail holds up OK in outdoor lighting conditions and is just about acceptable in indoor shots; but there is a significant loss of detail in low light. Push the magnification further for medium range (~4x) and long range (~8x) zoom shots, and a further loss of detail is evident.

Together with the low detail, an increase in both noise and artifacts is visible in the SE’s medium- and long-range zoom shots. In all tested conditions, ringing and aliasing are often visible, together with a coarse noise effect on portraits or in darker areas.

Performance in Portrait mode is another area impacted by the iPhone SE (2020)’s single-camera setup. Although in many cases it does a respectable job of subject segmentation, significant errors occur on objects either connected to or on the same focal plane as the subject. The absence of a depth sensor means that the device struggles to apply a realistic blur gradient effect, so the same level of blur is applied to objects in the background regardless of their distance from the subject.

You can see in the example below that while the SE (2020)’s portrait is sharp, the wine glass and plate are blurred just like the background. Although not perfect, the Pixel 3 manages to keep these elements sharp. The iPhone SE also has some consistency problems with bokeh activation: when the subject isn’t very prominent in the frame, the effect is often not applied.

On the plus side, noise is uniform across blurred and sharp areas, and the depth-of-field effect is pleasant. It’s not one of the strongest blur effects we’ve seen, and bokeh spotlights are a little underwhelming, but it does an acceptable job when the portrait is quite large in the frame and not connected to other elements.

The iPhone SE (2020) is also some ways down in our rankings for its night photography capabilities. Results are best using flash for night portraits, where flash exposure on portraits is fairly good and the level of detail is acceptable. Performance is a bit inconsistent, with the flash occasionally failing to activate when needed in auto-flash mode, and white balance can be slightly cold.

The iPhone SE (2020) avoids any serious white balance color casts, but skin tones and color saturation aren’t quite as pleasant as we observed on the Pixel 3. The main problem is dynamic range, however: with very limited ambient light captured when using the flash, backgrounds are often very dark, making the portrait look a little stark. Flash-off portraits in bright night conditions, such as under strong street lighting, can be more successful overall. Ghosting is often visible on moving elements without flash, but if you can get the subject to remain fairly still, the overall exposure is more pleasant, white balance is accurate, and colors are reasonably well saturated.

With no dedicated Night mode on the iPhone SE (2020), you’re relying on either its auto-flash or its flash-off mode for low-light cityscapes. Exposure is far from the best we’ve seen in these tests, with a slightly low target exposure and some highlight clipping evident in very bright lights. White balance is accurate and color rendering is OK, but detail is very low, with lots of noise visible. Night performance with the flash off is another area the iPhone 11 display a notable improvement over its inexpensive counterpart, thanks to improved detail and lower noise.

A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of tested attributes in the same way as the Photo score. Tested in its 4K/30fps mode, the iPhone SE (2020) achieved the following scores: Exposure (89), Color (89), Autofocus (88), Texture (70), Noise (78), Artifacts (84), and Stabilization (90). In this section, we take a closer look at the device’s strengths and weaknesses for video, with some comparisons against the iPhone 11 and Pixel 3.

Under benchmark testing in the lab, video target exposures on the iPhone SE are generally acceptable and very similar to the iPhone 11’s. Target exposures aren’t as bright compared to the Pixel 3’s, and the SE’s videos are slightly underexposed in low light, but these caveats aside, you can be confident of nice video exposure.

Wide dynamic range ensures highlights are well controlled in video captures of high-contrast scenes as well, which helped bolster the SE’s exposure score in our perceptual analysis. Exposure convergence and speed when transitioning between different lighting environments is pretty good, with our testers observing only minor oscillations and overshoots.

Video color is generally pleasant, too. Nice rendering with well-saturated hues and accurate color uniformity means you won’t have too many complaints. Slight white balance instabilities are evident, but the SE (2020) generally avoids serious color casts under artificial indoor lighting. Color isn’t quite as good in low light, however, where the underexposure affects saturation and makes the colors look a little muddy, and strong white balance casts are visible. So it’s better to seek out some nice outdoor or decent indoor lighting when shooting video on the iPhone SE (2020).

Texture and details are also pretty well preserved in the iPhone SE (2020)’s 4K videos, with results comparable to the iPhone 11’s for both indoor and outdoor videos. It’s best in very bright light (1000 lux), and although acceptable under indoor conditions (100 lux) at around 70% acutance, it’s not quite as good as the Pixel 3 or many recent 4K devices we’ve tested, which can maintain 80%+ acutance indoors. Details drops off significantly in the iPhone SE (2020)’s videos in very low light as well.

Autofocus is a slight weakness for video on the iPhone SE (2020) due to relatively poor tracking capabilities, especially in low light. That issue aside, reaction times are generally quick and performance is reliable. We applied some penalty points for video artifacts that included frame rate instabilities, visible ringing, judder effects, as well as aliasing and moiré, but they are generally minor issues that don’t have a significant impact on the overall playback experience.

Stabilization isn’t perfect either, with some global motion in both static and walking videos, as well as some noticeable jello and a difference in sharpness between frames. That said, it’s far from the worst we’ve seen, and videos remain generally stable during scene changes and avoid any noticeable frame shifts or jumps.

Apple’s SE range is popular with consumers wedded to the Apple ecosystem who are looking for a physically smaller (not to mention less expensive) device. The second-generation model stays faithful to those principles; and although the 4.7-inch screen and single-camera setup are unusual in 2020, a power boost via the A13 chip, IP67-rated protection, and increased storage with a 256GB model, give the SE a much needed refresh.

The main camera is basically the same as before, though, with a single 12MP sensor for stills and 4K video. This said, signal processing technologies from the iPhone 11 have filtered down to the SE, and in many respects the SE offers comparable image quality to its pricier stablemate. Accordingly, the iPhone SE nails the basics, with generally excellent exposure and color, wide dynamic range, and pretty good detail. However, it’s not as good as the iPhone 11 in low light, doesn’t offer an ultra-wide camera, and its DXOMARK Camera ranking is affected by pretty poor zoom and bokeh capabilities.

Occasional camera-phone photographers shooting in reasonable light will be content, but if you’re after high-quality night, zoom, and bokeh shots, as well as the ability to capture a very wide field of view, you may be a little disappointed with the 2020 version of the Apple iPhone SE.

The third-generation iPhone SE (2022 edition) is not only the cheapest model in Apple"s lineup, but it"s also smaller than most other phones on the market... except for one: the iPhone 13 mini!

The iPhone SE from 2022 is available at Walmart for the major carriers. This one is the Verizon version, currently retailing at just $5 a month for 36 installments. Keep in mind that not all storage variants are available at the moment.

Apple"s iPhone SE (2022) is also available at BestBuy with a carrier plan from either AT&T, T-Mobile, or Verizon. You can save if you trade in an eligible device.

Deal: The pre-paid version of the iPhone 13 mini is now available at Walmart with a discount. Straight Talk mobile. Right now, Product RED is available and other colors are out of stock.

The iPhone 13 mini can now be yours for free from Verizon. You only need to pick from select 5G unlimited plans and a new line. No trade-in is required.

The iPhone SE (2022) looks like a bit of an antique in the tech world of today with its big borders around the screen and dated design, while the 13 mini has a way more contemporary look with an edge to edge screen and flat sides.

However, even with its antiquated design, the SE doesn"t feel poorly made at all. It has a glass back and an aluminum frame much like the 13 mini, and both phones also have water and dust protection. There is a tiny difference in the protection rating: you have IP67 on the SE vs IP68 on the 13 mini, but that really is a negligible difference.

Of course, the iPhone 13 mini lives up to its name and is a bit smaller indeed, plus it"s also a smidgen lighter. However, both leave the impression of being extremely lightweight and comfortable to carry in a pocket.

In terms of usability, the flat sided design of the 13 mini makes it easier to pick the phone from a table. The SE, on the other hand, comes with curved sides which help for a more comfortable in-hand feel.

But while we may argue about beauty and aesthetics, there is no arguing about screen quality: the iPhone 13 mini has the better screen, and that"s easy to see. It has a larger 5.4" panel vs 4.7" on the SE. They have different dimensions too: the 13 mini is taller and narrower, while the SE screen has wider dimensions.

What matters the most here, however, is screen tech. The SE uses the older LCD tech, while the 13 mini bets on more modern OLED technology. The OLED panel has perfect blacks, excellent contrast, vibrant colors, no ghosting, and it features a sharper resolution (750p on the SE vs 1080p on the 13 mini). We noticed the SE was dimmer, it had a slower response, ghosting, and worse viewing angles. An easy win for the 13 mini.

The CIE 1931 xy color gamut chart represents the set (area) of colors that a display can reproduce, with the sRGB colorspace (the highlighted triangle) serving as reference. The chart also provides a visual representation of a display"s color accuracy. The small squares across the boundaries of the triangle are the reference points for the various colors, while the small dots are the actual measurements. Ideally, each dot should be positioned on top of its respective square. The "x: CIE31" and "y: CIE31" values in the table below the chart indicate the position of each measurement on the chart. "Y" shows the luminance (in nits) of each measured color, while "Target Y" is the desired luminance level for that color. Finally, "ΔE 2000" is the Delta E value of the measured color. Delta E values of below 2 are ideal.

The Color accuracy chart gives an idea of how close a display"s measured colors are to their referential values. The first line holds the measured (actual) colors, while the second line holds the reference (target) colors. The closer the actual colors are to the target ones, the better.

The Grayscale accuracy chart shows whether a display has a correct white balance (balance between red, green and blue) across different levels of grey (from dark to bright). The closer the Actual colors are to the Target ones, the better.

In terms of biometrics, the 13 mini relies on Face ID, while the SE brings back the Touch ID home button. Face ID feels effortless (and now works with masks too), but there is something reassuring about having a physical home button with Touch ID and that fingerprint sensor is reliable as ever.

Apple shook the budget phone market a couple of years ago with the original iPhone SE, which had a flagship-grade processor... unheard for in a budget phone at the time! These days, we were not quite as surprised to see the latest Apple A15 chip power the iPhone SE. But even if the element of surprise is gone, we can still appreciate it. A budget phone having the same firepower as the 13 mini, that"s remarkable.

In terms of software, both launched with iOS 15, but have since then received the iOS 16 update and will likely get the typical Apple treatment with 5 or 6 years of software updates (counting from the year of their launch), so you should not be worried about either of these phones withstanding the test of time.

Okay, the truth is that SE stands for "Special Edition", or at least it used to, but it does indeed come with just one camera on its back, while the 13 mini brings that same wide lens but with an ultra-wide one too.

It"s actually quite nice to see that the SE (2022) has all the same computational bells and whistles, even Smart HDR4 and improvements to video quality, and the only thing missing on the camera specs sheet is the sensor-shift video stabilization that you get on the 13 mini.

The main difference in daylight photos comes mostly from the wider camera on the iPhone 13 mini compared to the SE, but for all else the colors, detail and dynamic range are remarkably similar.

In low light, however, the SE does not support night mode and this is noticeable in the pictures which just lack the clarity and vibrance you get out of the iPhone 13 mini. It"s a much more noticeable difference.

Again, the wider field of view on the iPhone 13 mini is noticeable, but as I move around you can also see how you get quite a bit of jitter on the SE while the 13 mini remains much more stable.

In low light, it"s not just about the video stabilization: detail appears blurry on the SE while it remains sharp on the 13 mini, and colors are also better preserved. Also notice how every movement of the camera results in ghosting on the SE, while the 13 mini maintains the picture quality.

The iPhone 13 mini might be small but it packs a punch with the speakers. The SE also employs a similar dual speaker system with a main, bottom-oriented main speaker helped by a secondary speaker in the earpiece, but you should be able to hear a difference. Stay tuned for more impressions coming soon.

Is there a difference in battery life between the SE (2022) and the 13 mini? We have run our three independent battery tests where phones are set at identical brightness levels for an equal playing field. Here are the results:

Ah, small phones and battery life! Not the happiest of couples, but if we let the inevitable sigh go and face reality, we"d see how the SE has actually improved from its predecessor, but it"s the 13 mini that lasts a bit more.

We get a full day with average use easily on the 13 mini, and that"s what matters after all, but these phones will disappoint heavy users or at least keep them tethered to a charger often.

Both the SE and the 13 mini support wireless charging, but you get the fancy and faster MagSafe magnetic charging on the 13 mini, while the SE cannot snap as tightly and is just not quite as cool with its regular wireless charging coils.

So... it"s time to get back to the question that started it all: should you spend nearly double the money on the $600 iPhone 13 mini when you can get an iPhone SE (2022) for $430?

If you are just an average user who mostly wants an iPhone that they would use as a phone with a bit of social media and messaging, we"d say that the iPhone SE will suffice just perfectly and leave you with some cash in your pocket.

This product is for iPhone Front Glass Replacement. iPhone SE 2020 Screen replacement is required if your phone cracked ONLY on the front glass. If your iPhone’s LCD is discolored, has lines appearing on display and/or has