15.6 lcd panel housing free sample

Winmate - a leading provider of industrial computers and display solutions - introduces our W15L100-15.6" Multi-Touch Panel Mount Display supporting 3840 x 2160 resolution. With displays four times the resolution of a Full HD display, these monitors achieve superior picture quality with exceptional image clarity and sharpness. The Multi-Touch Panel Mount Displays is ideal for a wide range of applications such as broadcasting, command centers, kiosks, and surveillance systems.

The Winmate Panel Mount Display series is available in screen sizes ranging from 13.3-inches to 55-inches and supports DP 1.2 + HDMI 1.4 + HDMI 2.0 video input along with the option for 3G/HD/SD-SDI input. The rear panel comes with a power on/off switch and an OSD membrane switch. The OSD allows users to adjust the monitor for brightness, contrast, phase & clock, color, H & V position, and auto-tune. Option is available for an MCS multi-display OSD menu controller. In addition, these 4K monitors provide a variety of embedded modules; HDMI Decoder, HDMI Receiver, HDMI Quad Display, and Portrait Mode, for video remote management and support of multiple screens over a network. For users requiring interactive applications, optional Resistive, Projected Capacitive, or Infrared type touch screens are available as well.

The panel housing of the monitors comes with a 6mm or 8mm aluminum front bezel with a short-depth metal rugged chassis. Option for an IP65 / NEMA4 rated front bezel is available for industries requiring additional protection. These industrial monitors provide panel or VESA mounts for easy mounting and installation and operate in temperatures from 0°C to 55°C, making them ideal for industrial applications and control room projects.

If you have a modern Windows laptop, there’s a good chance your screen is 16:9. If you have a gaming laptop, its panel is almost certainly 16:9. (It’s unusual to find high refresh-rate panels with other proportions.) There are some notable exceptions: Microsoft’s Surface products have been 3:2 for quite some time, while Dell’s last few XPS 13 models and Apple’s MacBooks are already 16:10. But traditionally, Windows laptops like these have been few and far between.

An important feature of the Beckhoff product philosophy is the use of latest, high-performance components and processors. As a result, Beckhoff Industrial PCs tend to include the latest offerings of the technology market. Every new technology, whether from the industrial or consumer segment, is tested by Beckhoff for its potential industrial application, adapted and optimized as appropriate and integrated. An outstanding example is the integration of modern multi-touch technology in the CP2xxx and CP3xxx device series. Modern touch technology has been gaining ground in the consumer market since 2007, and since 2012, Beckhoff has consistently been taking advantage of it in its Panel PCs to offer advanced and intuitive machine and system operation options. Beckhoff made the functional principle of capacitive touch technology suitable for industrial use in terms of availability, electromagnetic compatibility, mechanical stability and external dimensions through integration of corresponding basic technologies. The CP2xxx and CP3xxx product families convincingly demonstrate how state-of-the-art consumer technology can also be successfully used in industrial environments.

What types of physician practices and hospitals self-report screening patients for food, housing, transportation, utilities, and interpersonal violence needs?

In a cross-sectional study of US hospitals and physician practices, approximately 24% of hospitals and 16% of physician practices reported screening for food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, transportation needs, and interpersonal violence. Federally qualified health centers and physician practices participating in bundled payments, primary care improvement models, and Medicaid accountable care organizations screened more than other hospitals, and academic medical centers screened more than other practices.

Social needs, including food, housing, utilities, transportation, and experience with interpersonal violence, are linked to health outcomes. Identifying patients with unmet social needs is a necessary first step to addressing these needs, yet little is known about the prevalence of screening.

Self-report of screening patients for food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, transportation needs, and experience with interpersonal violence.

Among 4976 physician practices, 2333 responded, a response rate of 46.9%. Among hospitals, 757 of 1628 (46.5%) responded. After eliminating responses because of ineligibility, 2190 physician practices and 739 hospitals remained. Screening for all 5 social needs was reported by 24.4% (95% CI, 20.0%-28.7%) of hospitals and 15.6% (95% CI, 13.4%-17.9%) of practices, whereas 33.3% (95% CI, 30.5%-36.2%) of practices and 8.0% (95% CI, 5.8%-11.0%) of hospitals reported no screening. Screening for interpersonal violence was most common (practices: 56.4%; 95% CI, 53.3%-2 59.4%; hospitals: 75.0%; 95% CI, 70.1%-79.3%), and screening for utility needs was least common (practices: 23.1%; 95% CI, 20.6%-26.0%; hospitals: 35.5%; 95% CI, 30.0%-41.0%) among both hospitals and practices. Among practices, federally qualified health centers (yes: 29.7%; 95% CI, 21.5%-37.8% vs no: 9.4%; 95% CI, 7.2%-11.6%; P < .001), bundled payment participants (yes: 21.4%; 95% CI, 17.1%-25.8% vs no: 10.7%; 95% CI, 7.9%-13.4%; P < .001), primary care improvement models (yes: 19.6%; 95% CI, 16.5%-22.6% vs no: 9.6%; 95% CI, 6.0%-13.1%; P < .001), and Medicaid accountable care organizations (yes: 21.8%; 95% CI, 17.4%-26.2% vs no: 11.2%; 95% CI, 8.6%-13.7%; P < .001) had higher rates of screening for all needs. Practices in Medicaid expansion states (yes: 17.7%; 95% CI, 14.8%-20.7% vs no: 11.4%; 95% CI, 8.1%-14.6%; P = .007) and those with more Medicaid revenue (highest tertile: 17.1%; 95% CI, 11.4%-22.7% vs lowest tertile: 9.0%; 95% CI, 6.1%-11.8%; P = .02) were more likely to screen. Academic medical centers were more likely than other hospitals to screen (49.5%; 95% CI, 34.6%-64.4% vs 23.0%; 95% CI, 18.5%-27.5%; P < .001).

To assess screening for social needs among physician practices and hospitals, the NSHOS asked “Does your practice have a system in place to screen patients for food insecurity (yes/no), housing instability (yes/no), utility needs (yes/no), transportation needs (yes/no), or interpersonal violence (yes/no)?” Hospitals were asked a similar question. We selected these 5 domains because these are part of the CMS’s Accountable Health Communities model. We characterized physician practices and hospitals that report screening patients for all 5 social needs.

We characterized physician practices and hospitals screening for all 5 social needs by using means and proportions with 95% CIs. We used χ2 tests to calculate significance. Significance was set at 2-sided P = .05. As a sensitivity analysis, we compared physician practices with hospitals that screened for food insecurity, housing instability, and utility needs; that screened for food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, and transportation needs; and that did not screen for any needs. We excluded survey respondents with missing data for a given variable.

Among 4976 physician practices, 2333 responded, a response rate of 46.9%. Among hospitals, 757 of 1628 (46.5%) responded. After eliminating responses because of ineligibility, 2190 physician practices and 739 hospitals remained. Screening rates varied by social need: 56.4% (95% CI, 53.3%-59.4%) of physician practices reported screening for interpersonal violence, 35.4% (95% CI, 32.5%-38.4%) for transportation needs, 29.6% (95% CI, 26.8%-32.7%) for food insecurity, 27.8% (95% CI, 27.8%-25.0%) for housing instability, and 23.1% (95% CI, 20.6%-26.0%) for utility needs. For hospitals, 75.0% (95% CI, 70.1%-79.3%) reported screening for interpersonal violence, 74.0% (95% CI, 69.2%-78.2%) for transportation needs, 60.1% (95% CI, 54.2%-65.8%) for housing instability, 39.8% (95% CI, 34.2%-45.7%) for food insecurity, and 35.5% (95% CI, 30.0%-41.0%) for utility needs (Figure 1). Most physician practices and hospitals did not screen for all 5 needs; 15.6% (95% CI, 13.4%-17.9%) of physician practices and 24.4% (95% CI, 20.0%-28.7%) of hospitals reported screening for all 5 social needs, whereas 33.3% (95% CI, 30.5%-36.2%) of physician practices and 8.0% (95% CI, 5.8%-11.0%) of hospitals reported screening for no social needs (Figure 2). Much of the overall screening activity was driven by screening for interpersonal violence: when screening for a single need, 74.2% (95% CI, 68.0%-79.5%) of physician practices and 57.3% (95% CI, 45.8%-68.2%) of hospitals reported screening only for experience with interpersonal violence.

Hospitals may also be more likely to screen patients for transportation and housing needs as part of their discharge processes because they are subject to federal regulations on patient safety as part of their certification from CMS.

ES.  Housing, transportation, and food: how ACOs seek to improve population health by addressing nonmedical needs of patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(11):2109-2115. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0727PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref

Accidental Damage is any damage due to an unintentional act that is not the direct result of a manufacturing defect or failure. Accidental damage is not covered under the standard warranty of the product. Such damage is often the result of a drop or an impact on the LCD screen or any other part of the product which may render the device non-functional. Such types of damage are only covered under an Accidental Damage service offering which is an optional add-on to the basic warranty of the product. Accidental Damage must not be confused with an occasional dead or stuck pixel on the LCD panel. For more information about dead or stuck pixels, see the Dell Display Pixel Guidelines.

The LCD glass on the display is manufactured to rigorous specifications and standards and will not typically crack or break on its own under normal use. In general, cracked, or broken glass is considered accidental damage and is not covered under the standard warranty.

Spots typically occur due to an external force hitting the screen causing damage to the LCD panel"s backlight assembly. While the top layer did not crack or break, the underlying area was compressed and damaged causing this effect.

If your Dell laptop LCD panel has any accidental damage but the laptop is not covered by the Accidental Damage service offering, contact Dell Technical Support for repair options.