lenovo y50-70 touch 20349 lcd touch screen digitizer display assembly made in ch

L’utilisation des fonctions suivantes pourrait être affectée pendant cette période: l’accès à l’information sur la garantie de votre appareil, la recherche de pièces et d’accessoires, la soumission de demande de service, le clavardage, la recherche de centre de service, l’état d’une réparation en cours, le téléchargement de logiciels et systèmes d’exploitation, certaines options de communications, l’enregistrement de produits et l’accès à votre liste de produits dans votre profil Lenovo.

lenovo y50 70 touch provide the touch interface in smartphones, which are vital for them to function. Alibaba.com stocks a stunning range of high-tech lenovo y50 70 touch with vibrant color depictions. Truly crystal-clear displays of lenovo y50 70 touch are available covering various brands and models such as the Samsung Galaxy Edge 2, OnePlus 7T, Samsung Galaxy C5, and many more.

lenovo y50 70 touch are the most commonly used displays, as they produce great image quality while consuming low power. Rather than emitting light directly, they use back lights or reflectors to produce images, which allows for easy readability even under direct sunlight. lenovo y50 70 touch are energy-efficient, and are comparatively safer to dispose of, than CRTs. lenovo y50 70 touch are much more efficient when it comes to usage in battery-powered electronic equipment, due to their minimal power consumption.

Some other advantages of lenovo y50 70 touch over the CRT counterparts are - sharper images, little to no heat emission, unaffected by magnetic fields, narrow frame borders, and extreme compactness, which make them very thin and light. Some types of lenovo y50 70 touch are transmissive, reflective, and transflective displays. Transmissive displays provide better image quality in the presence of low or medium-light, while reflective displays work best in the presence of bright light. The third type of lenovo y50 70 touch, transflective, combine the best features of both the other types and provide a well-balanced display.

Whether as an individual purchaser, supplier or wholesaler, browse for an extensive spectrum of lenovo y50 70 touch at Alibaba.com if you don"t want to stretch a dollar yet find the best fit.

lenovo y50 70 touch provide the touch interface in smartphones, which are vital for them to function. Alibaba.com stocks a stunning range of high-tech lenovo y50 70 touch with vibrant color depictions. Truly crystal-clear displays of lenovo y50 70 touch are available covering various brands and models such as the Samsung Galaxy Edge 2, OnePlus 7T, Samsung Galaxy C5, and many more.

lenovo y50 70 touch are the most commonly used displays, as they produce great image quality while consuming low power. Rather than emitting light directly, they use back lights or reflectors to produce images, which allows for easy readability even under direct sunlight. lenovo y50 70 touch are energy-efficient, and are comparatively safer to dispose of, than CRTs. lenovo y50 70 touch are much more efficient when it comes to usage in battery-powered electronic equipment, due to their minimal power consumption.

Some other advantages of lenovo y50 70 touch over the CRT counterparts are - sharper images, little to no heat emission, unaffected by magnetic fields, narrow frame borders, and extreme compactness, which make them very thin and light. Some types of lenovo y50 70 touch are transmissive, reflective, and transflective displays. Transmissive displays provide better image quality in the presence of low or medium-light, while reflective displays work best in the presence of bright light. The third type of lenovo y50 70 touch, transflective, combine the best features of both the other types and provide a well-balanced display.

Whether as an individual purchaser, supplier or wholesaler, browse for an extensive spectrum of lenovo y50 70 touch at Alibaba.com if you don"t want to stretch a dollar yet find the best fit.

Lenovo"s push into the touch-oriented market goes back at least to its CES 2013 launch of the world’s largest production tablet PC. Today, we see the focus across several models of traditional notebooks, too. Rather than question the value of a touchscreen in the enthusiast gaming market, or any other place where you really need a mouse still, we’re going to look at how this slim gaming notebook stacks up in the areas of slimness, gaming and being a notebook. To most of us, a touchscreen on a non-convertible notebook is an added feature rather than a necessity.

For around $1200, Lenovo adds an aluminum-wrapped chassis filled with Core i7-4700HQ processor, GeForce GTX 860M and 1TB hybrid drive to that 1920x1080 ten-point touch display.

Everyone is, actually. You really need to look at the part number to figure out what you have, as dozens of these indicate anything from a slight production deviation to a full-fledged overhaul. That’s why I’m forced to pepper this article with product number 59420895, even though a search for that string on Lenovo’s own website produces no results. You canfind it on Amazon.

Lenovo ditches the optical drive in favor of thinness, which makes some sense since most games are now downloadable. It was only able to squish the Y50-70 down to 1.1”, since that discrete GPU requires additional cooling.

Lenovo similarly rid the design of a battery bay, opting instead for a power source that can be replaced only after removing the bottom of the Y50-70’s chassis. The battery itself is also smaller than what you"ll find on many gaming notebooks at 54Wh, and both the CPU and GPU favor slimness by not having a socket or slot. Both are BGA.

The company even slims its warranty down to one year, compared to the two to three years of some competitors, along with the boxed extras, including only the required 6.1” x2.5” x1.2” power brick. Now that we’ve covered the specs, let’s take a look at what else the Y50-70 Touch 59420895 gives its buyers.Lenovo Y50-70 Touch Laptop: Price Comparison

Ghost Touch, Running Touch, No-Touch, and Inverted Touch are not screen related issues. Kindly check your digitizer board and cable since they are the most likely cause of any touch issue; please do not open a return claiming the touch did not work. If the machine has a weakened or fragile digitizer board, the replacement unit or assembly will not have proper touch or in some cases it may not have touch at all. The order is not processed unless requested information has been received.

N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430

B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5D10G85620 N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430 N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430 Lenovo 5T50G99217 N156HGE-EA1 Lenovo 5D10G85620 B156htn03.6 Lenovo Sd10f28491 Lenovo 59444175 Lenovo 59445083 Lenovo SD10F28491 Lenovo 5D10J40809 LTN156FL02-L01 Lenovo 5D10F78784 Lenovo 59426255 Lenovo 59439765 Lenovo 59428535 B156HTN03.6 Lenovo 5T50G99217 Lenovo 04X4812 Lenovo 59428535 Lenovo 59429430 AP14R000200

There are two different resolutions used in Lenovo Y50-70 Models. Listed Touch Screen Assembly comes with Full HD 1920 X 1080 resolution . B156HTN03.6 and N156HGE-EA1 are common FULL HD screen part numbers, listed assembly will work for. It is not compatible to 4K 3840 X 2160 LTN156FL02 touch assembly. 3840x2160 UHD and Listed Product is not going to work for that resolution. Again , 4K 3840 X 2160 LTN156FL02 Touch assembly for Lenovo Y50-70 is expensive product and this listing does not represent that.

The agony of choice. After our first review of the FHD version of the new Lenovo Y50 Gaming notebook, we are now focusing on a version with UHD display (3840x2160 pixels) and fast Samsung SSD. Full HD and matte or ultra HD and glossy? That"s the question. We compare both displays.

The Lenovo Y50 is one of the most interesting products in the 2014 portfolio of the Chinese hardware giant. The device is explicitly advertised as a gaming notebook, even though its design (15.6-inch, 4 kilograms, 24 millimeters height) and equipment (Intel Core i7-4710HQ, Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M, SSD) would allow it to be part of the high-performance multimedia segment. Probably it"s exactly this balancing act that makes the device interesting for a large clientele. A lot of performance in a smart and mobile chassis at an attractive price. Sounds like a clear victory, there is, however, a catch...

In our first test of the Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70we went through a configuration for the US market, equipped with a Full HD display as offered in many shops in Germany. Our conclusion: great package, but disappointing display with low brightness and contrast, not to mention the poor color accuracy and the limited viewing angles. Looking at the aggressive entry level price of only 899 Euros, ~$1181 (i5-4200M, 860M), we immediately find the explanation for that extremely bad panel.

Starting from 1399 Euros, ~$1838 (1199 Euros, ~$1575, without operating system), the UHD display we are focusing on with a resolution of 3840x2160 pixelsis used. The large price difference to the entry-level configuration is explained by the Intel i7-4710HQ quad-core CPU and a 512 GB SSD. In the following review we are dealing with the differences to the already tested version. Further information on the identically constructed chassis can be retrieved from the existing test of the Lenovo Y50-70 with FHD display.

Contrary to the first tested version of the Lenovo IdeaPad Y50, which is equipped with an Intel wireless AC3160, the top configuration for the German market is equipped with an Atheros module(AR9565 b/g/n). We performed a comparative test with three other devices.

After the arms race of higher gigabyte and gigahertz levels of recent years, now the display is in the spotlight of the manufacturer and its marketing department. That the stupid push up of pixels matters here first, as our "common sense" tells us that 3840x2160 pixelsjust have to be better (!) than the antiquated 1920x1080 pixels, comes as no surprise. Next to resolution, a display also has other qualities (or not) that we are focusing on now.

The offered pixel density of a high 284 pixels per inch assures a pin-sharp image of all scalable vector contents. This stands out positively for texts that are still readable at even small font sizes and a small distance from the display, and that still show sharp contours. Of course, image and video material could profit from such detail abundance, but corresponding video material is not available yet on a large scale. As already mentioned in many of our tests of high-resolution displays, one often has to put up with representation errors, especially for older software tools that cannot be scaled appropriately.

An essential point of criticism of the alternative FHD display of the Y50 was its poor brightness. With a maximum of 237 cd/m2 it was only insignificantly higher than required for an entry-level notebook. The UHD panel already improved in this point. We measure a maximum of 290 cd/m2 in the central area at an average brightness of 257 Candela. The drop toward the edges, which is clearly visible in the diagram, results in an illumination of just 80%. In practice, however, no impairments could be observed. Only in a completely dark room with pure black background, a translucency of the background illumination (screen bleeding) could be observed in the upper right corner.

Choosing the right display is made even more difficult by the different panels that are available for the FHD version. Next to the already tested CMN15C4 (Chi Mei N1156HGE-EAB), an AU Optronics (AUO36ED) panel is used which our Polish colleagues found in their test of the Y50. With a brightness of 234 Candela on average and a contrast of only 275:1, it is still on a comparably bad level as the Chi-Mei alternative. On its homepage, Lenovo states that the UHD display is a touch display. However, the version that we tested (59424712) does not show any touch functionality.

Black level of 0.51 cd/m2 is lower than for the FHD panel; together with the higher brightness this increases the maximum picture contrast significantly: with 566:1 the display is only mid-table and there is still room for improvements to the (considerably more expensive) top class (MacBook Pro 15 Retina: 998:1, Dell XPS 15: 1.662:1).

Also in terms of color representation we noticed an improvement: grayscales and colors of the FHD display which are considerably shifted to the blue color range (DeltaE of 10) are now improved to more accurate colors and grayscales with a deviation (DeltaE) of only 3. This value is just at the limit of the color differences that the human eye can distinguish. The attempt of further improvement through display calibration did not result in significant shifts.

Coverage of the sRGB and the AdobeRGB color spaces is not ensured (even though better than for the FHD display), which should, however, not be of a major role for non-graphics and non-image experts.

Outdoor use is determined by a combination of display brightness and surface. The FHD display of the already tested Y50 was equipped with a matte panel, whereas the current UHD version has a glossy surface. In terms of brightness, the FHD display achieves 221 cd/m2 on average and brightness reduces by 40 Candela when running on battery only, whereas the glossy UHD panel reaches a higher value of 257 cd/m2 which is still available when running on battery only.

Neither of the two versions is perfectly suited for outdoor use. Too low brightness of the FHD display and annoying reflections of the UHD display blur the image here and there.

A last significant difference of the two available display types is the viewing angle. The FH panel relies on TN technology; in the case of the UHD display, an IPS panel is used according to numerous data sheets of different shops. Respectively, large differences in possible viewing angles result: where impairments of the viewing angle can be noted for the Lenovo Y50 with FHD panel, the UHD display also remains stable for flatter viewing angles. In extreme positions, a slight wash-out of the represented image can be observed; atypical for an IPS panel. In this case, annoying reflections show up more.

In direct comparison i7-4700HQ vs. 4710HQ, the latter features a greater 100 MHz base(2.4 vs. 2.5 GHz) and maximum turbo clock rate (3.4 vs. 3.5 GHz). The Cinebench benchmark comparison clearly shows this. Our available test device outperforms our first test configuration by 3-7%. Also interesting is the comparison to the alternatively offeredIntelCPU of the Lenovo Y50-70, a standard voltage dual-core chip. Due to a high turbo it can perform the single-thread test on a comparable level as its quad-core colleagues. Only in the multi-core test the processor drops behind.Since GPU performance is first and foremost still limiting for most games, the offered dual-core CPU would be even capable of maxing out the GTX 860M in many current games.

In comparison to other devices with similar CPU, the Cinebench Multi-core Rendering test reveals that full potential of the CPU is not entirely used (minus 15-30%). In a matter of seconds, clock speeds are limited to 2.5 GHz (basis clock pulse). That happens independently of the chip temperature and is most likely set by Lenovo in order to keep the exhaust heat of the CPU within reasonable ranges. The single-core test is very well performed; clock speeds are between 3.3 and 3.5 GHz.

Results of PCMark 7 are impressive, which is mainly due to the use of an SSD. The configuration we tested with minimally fast CPU and fast SSD exceeds the results of the Y50-70 version with an already enhanced SSHD.

Starting from 1299 Euros (~$1707), the Lenovo Ideapad Y50-70 can be purchased with the integrated 512 GB SSD; a 256 GB drive version starts from 999 Euros (~$1312). Given the expected high memory requirements of games, we would advise to go for the larger storage volume.

The Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP SSDthat is implemented into our test modelcosts around 250 Euros (~$328) as a single component. Those considering an upgrade should take this into account. According to Lenovo"s

Under load, the currently tested IdeaPad Y50-70 behaves identically to the other version, which comes as no surprise, considering the approximately same core components. In 3DMark06 we measured a noise level of 38.6 to 42.3 dB(A) (dark green curve), which can be described as a rather low-frequent, but not really annoying, whooshing. In the stress test, the used fans (one for CPU and one for GPU) turn faster and an increase in higher frequencies can be noticed.

That theIdeaPad Y50-70 heats up under load was already shown by the first test we performed on the other version. Overall, the observed characteristics of the temperature development at the surfaces are very similar for the current test model; however, even slightly higher peak temperatures of over 60 °C could be measured at the bottom of the device.

The speakers that are used for the Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 are not only subjectively good; frequency analysisalsoshows good coverage of a broad frequency band, from deep to high tones. The three graphs show the behavior at 25, 50 and 100% volume. The measured maximum volume was 76 dB/ 41 sone (white noise) or 78 dB/ 45 sone (pink noise).

In the practically relevant Wi-Fi test, the performed control benchmark showed roughly the same battery life as the already tested version with FHD display and SSHD drive.

Let"s get down to the conclusion. In the beginning we asked ourselves which of the two offered Lenovo IdeaPad Y50display versions is the better one. After having performed this review update, we arrive at the following conclusion:

In the case of the current Y50-70 we would tend to go for theUHD version. This decision relies, however, on the fact that we had to choose the lesser evil, not on the fact that the UHD display of the test device convinced us. The slightly better brightness, the improved color representation as well as the high resolution that offers at least advantages in terms of office use - even though there might not be any advantages in terms of gaming - compensate for the disadvantage of a glossy display surface, especially if the device is used indoors.

If one looks at possible competitors within the same price range, the decision to choose for the preferred UHD screen might change. (GTX 860M) which is equally equipped with a matte and luminous FHD display could also convince. The hot deal is

Overall, it is a pity that Lenovo - since it already offers different display versions - does not have an optional, high-end panel solution in order to keep its competitors under control. With the current components many potential customers will probably wave it aside. The UHD display tries to hide its modest measured values behind the general resolution hype.