lcd panel photo brands

Flat-panel displays are thin panels of glass or plastic used for electronically displaying text, images, or video. Liquid crystal displays (LCD), OLED (organic light emitting diode) and microLED displays are not quite the same; since LCD uses a liquid crystal that reacts to an electric current blocking light or allowing it to pass through the panel, whereas OLED/microLED displays consist of electroluminescent organic/inorganic materials that generate light when a current is passed through the material. LCD, OLED and microLED displays are driven using LTPS, IGZO, LTPO, and A-Si TFT transistor technologies as their backplane using ITO to supply current to the transistors and in turn to the liquid crystal or electroluminescent material. Segment and passive OLED and LCD displays do not use a backplane but use indium tin oxide (ITO), a transparent conductive material, to pass current to the electroluminescent material or liquid crystal. In LCDs, there is an even layer of liquid crystal throughout the panel whereas an OLED display has the electroluminescent material only where it is meant to light up. OLEDs, LCDs and microLEDs can be made flexible and transparent, but LCDs require a backlight because they cannot emit light on their own like OLEDs and microLEDs.

Liquid-crystal display (or LCD) is a thin, flat panel used for electronically displaying information such as text, images, and moving pictures. They are usually made of glass but they can also be made out of plastic. Some manufacturers make transparent LCD panels and special sequential color segment LCDs that have higher than usual refresh rates and an RGB backlight. The backlight is synchronized with the display so that the colors will show up as needed. The list of LCD manufacturers:

Organic light emitting diode (or OLED displays) is a thin, flat panel made of glass or plastic used for electronically displaying information such as text, images, and moving pictures. OLED panels can also take the shape of a light panel, where red, green and blue light emitting materials are stacked to create a white light panel. OLED displays can also be made transparent and/or flexible and these transparent panels are available on the market and are widely used in smartphones with under-display optical fingerprint sensors. LCD and OLED displays are available in different shapes, the most prominent of which is a circular display, which is used in smartwatches. The list of OLED display manufacturers:

MicroLED displays is an emerging flat-panel display technology consisting of arrays of microscopic LEDs forming the individual pixel elements. Like OLED, microLED offers infinite contrast ratio, but unlike OLED, microLED is immune to screen burn-in, and consumes less power while having higher light output, as it uses LEDs instead of organic electroluminescent materials, The list of MicroLED display manufacturers:

LCDs are made in a glass substrate. For OLED, the substrate can also be plastic. The size of the substrates are specified in generations, with each generation using a larger substrate. For example, a 4th generation substrate is larger in size than a 3rd generation substrate. A larger substrate allows for more panels to be cut from a single substrate, or for larger panels to be made, akin to increasing wafer sizes in the semiconductor industry.

2015, sold to giantplus and tce photomasks, gen 3 still operated by giantplus, gen 4 line sold to giantplus, equipment sold and line demolished, remainder operated by tce

"Samsung Display has halted local Gen-8 LCD lines: sources". THE ELEC, Korea Electronics Industry Media. August 16, 2019. Archived from the original on April 3, 2020. Retrieved December 18, 2019.

"TCL to Build World"s Largest Gen 11 LCD Panel Factory". www.businesswire.com. May 19, 2016. Archived from the original on April 2, 2018. Retrieved April 1, 2018.

"Panel Manufacturers Start to Operate Their New 8th Generation LCD Lines". 대한민국 IT포털의 중심! 이티뉴스. June 19, 2017. Archived from the original on June 30, 2019. Retrieved June 30, 2019.

"TCL"s Panel Manufacturer CSOT Commences Production of High Generation Panel Modules". www.businesswire.com. June 14, 2018. Archived from the original on June 30, 2019. Retrieved June 30, 2019.

"Samsung Display Considering Halting Some LCD Production Lines". 비즈니스코리아 - BusinessKorea. August 16, 2019. Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 19, 2019.

Herald, The Korea (July 6, 2016). "Samsung Display accelerates transition from LCD to OLED". www.koreaherald.com. Archived from the original on April 1, 2018. Retrieved April 1, 2018.

"China"s BOE to have world"s largest TFT-LCD+AMOLED capacity in 2019". ihsmarkit.com. 2017-03-22. Archived from the original on 2019-08-16. Retrieved 2019-08-17.

The best monitors for photo editing are good investments for all kinds of photographers – enthusiasts as well as professionals. Unless you plan to only ever look at you photos on the screen they were edited on, broad colour coverage, accuracy and uniformity and essential to ensure your photos look the way you expect when you see them on another device, send them to a client or print them out.

A monitor that isn"t up to the job can result in edited photos that are too bright or dark or contain over or under-saturated colours. The best monitors for photo editing can avoid that by supporting wide colour spaces such as Adobe RGB, accurate colours and adjustable brightness and contrast.

Below we"ve made our pick of the best monitors for photo editing looking out for these and other useful features based on our own reviews and recommendations from our contributors. We"ve provided recommendations at different price points in order to provide options for enthusiasts as well as professionals. This is because the best monitors for photographers overall are far too expensive for many non-professionals to consider, but there are alternatives that aren"t as perfect but offer decent specs at affordable prices. Just note that while some of the more expensive devices come with their own calibration tools, with cheaper options, you"ll defintely need a monitor calibrator.

Most photographers today want to work on 4K screens, especially if they work with video as well as stills. We"ve included some options here, but we also have a specific guide to the best 4K monitors if you want more. And we also have a guide to the best monitors for video editing. Meanwhile, if you want a tactile screen, which can be useful for making selections for localised photo editing, take a look at our roundup of the best touchscreen monitors.

We rate the BenQ SW321C as the best monitor for photo editing overall. It"s not cheap by any means, but it"s not the most expensive screen either, offering a good balance between price and quality – because the quality is fantastic. It boasts 99% Adobe RGB, 100% sRGB and 95% P3 gamut coverage, and you can quickly switch between colour spaces thanks to a separate control unit. And the screen comes expertly calibrated, although it also offers hardware calibration independent of your computer.

If a stunningly specced monitor like the BenQ screen above is way too much of an outlay for where you are in your photography career (or hobby) at the moment, then this LG monitor should appeal. It"s very reasonably priced, but there"s much to like in the specs too. It offers 98% coverage of the sRGB space, which is more than enough for many, especially if you"re not editing professionally.

Eizo has a reputation for being the ultimate professional photo-editing monitor brand, and the first time you see the clarity, vivacity and brightness of an Eizo display, it’s immediately obvious why – and why its photo-editing monitors are so much more expensive than those of competitors – and more expensive than most PCs.

We"ve mentioned 4K monitors so far, and 4K resolution is fast becoming the norm, but you may not really need it, especially if you"re only working with stills photography and don"t need to edit video as well. Dell’s UltraSharp range always delivers a great image and, while the monitors" designs don"t exactly stand out from the crowd, the tiny bezels around this display do make it easy on the eye.

We generally recommend going for a reasonably large screen (between 27 and 34in when choosing the best monitor for photo editing, but that can be a challenge if you don"t have the desk space (or don"t have the office space for a larger desk!). But the HP M24FW is rather unique in that it"s a relatively small screen with very respectable color space coverage, and it"s also an absolute bargain, costing $150 – $200 / £120 – £150.

All that aside, however, when it comes to editing photos, this monitor is not a bad choice, especially if you"re a fan of Apple products and you"re looking for an option to pair with a Mac mini or to expand the screen on your MacBook Pro. It offers decent multimedia features and consistent colour and brightness, which are the main priorities when it comes to photo editing.

There several things to consider and look out for when you"re choosing a monitor for photo editing. Some of the most important are to decide what size monitor you want. There are also minimum requirements you should look for in terms of resolution and colour accuracy. We"ll discuss some of those questions below.Why do I need to choose one of the best monitors for photo editing?Images look different on different screens because displays differ in their colour coverage and accuracy. That means that if the screen you work on has poor colour coverage and accuracy, your work could look very different on a different screen or when printed out.

Good colour coverage is especially important if you"re doing HSL adjustments and colour grading. While you can"t guarantee what screen your clients or public will use to see your photos, you can at least ensure that you"re own screen is allowing you to make the most accurate edit possible.Which is the best monitor for photo editing?The very best monitor for photo editing in our view is the Eizo ColorEdge CG319X at number three in our list above. We only place it at number three rather than at the top because we"ve also taken price into consideration, and monitors such as this are simply not an option for many enthusiasts, and even for many professionals.

We currently recommend the BenQ SW321C as the best monitor for photo editing for those looking for a balance between professional specs and a slightly more accessible price.What size monitor should I use for photo editing?One important thing to consider when buying a monitor for photo editing is the size of screen that you want to work on. Many displays come in the standard 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio, although a taller screen (or a screen that you can rotate like the LG Ultrafine Ergo in our list above) can be useful for editing images in portrait orientation.

Ultra-wide monitors will give you a lot more screen space to work on so that you can have multiple windows or panels open, but they aren"t necessarily the best for focused work. They also take up a huge amount of space. Generally, we find that most photographers like editing on a monitor that"s between 27in and 32in.What monitor resolution do I need for photo editing?Put very simply, the higher the resolution, the better the sharpness and detail of the image, but that depends on the size of the monitor – and of course, higher resolution monitors are usually more expensive. When looking to pick the best monitor for photo editing, we would recommend going for a resolution of 4K (3,840 x 2,160) if you can afford it.

Most of the screens in our list of the best monitors for photo editing are 4K displays (double check that your PC or Mac supports 4K resolution if it"s quite an old device), but we have also included an QHD and FHD screen, both much more affordable while still offering the good colour coverage you want for photo editing.Do I need a 4K monitor for photo editing?Not at all. We recommend using a 4K screen since it will offer a sharper, cleaner and more detailed image if the screen is large enough, and since 4K monitors have become more affordable, it"s not so much of a difficult decision. But if you prefer a smaller screen (less than 27 inches), then you"re not going to see much of a difference between 4K and FHD, and the interface scaling may make things too small to be comfortable.What else should I consider in a monitor for photo editing?If you"re buying a monitor for photo editing, colour is vital and it"s a good idea to look for a that display supports colour spaces like Adobe sRGB. You"ll also want a uniform brightness across the screen. The best monitors for photo editing include their own calibration tools, but this is not an essential since you can also buy an external monitor calibrator to perform regulator calibration of your screen.

Choosing the best monitors for photo editing is important. It"s not just about your own viewing comfort and satisfaction. It"s essential that you get a proper rendition of the detail, color and contrast in your photos.

When you"re editing an image, you only have what you see on the screen to go by – and if your monitor isn"t up to the job, you can easily end up correcting the monitor"s faults when your photos are perfectly fine. Of course, the best monitor calibrators(opens in new tab) can help you to sort out your screen and ensure optimum accuracy, too.

In this guide, we"ve picked some of the best monitors on the market that prioritize resolution, color accuracy, brightness consistency and contrast to display your photos properly. If you regularly move around with your system, then take a look at the best portable monitors(opens in new tab).

The best monitor for photo editing will obviously depend on what device you actually use. For Apple fans, the best monitors for MacBook Pro(opens in new tab) will extend your workspace and give you superb image quality.

The excellent 27-inch LG 27UL500-W might look expensive compared to budget screens you see in a computer store, but if you can afford the extra it"s well worth it. The 4K resolution is ideal for photographers, and the Color Calibration Pro tool boosts the color accuracy of the monitor, which is essential for anyone who is looking for high-end photography capabilities but at a competitive price.

Monitors with dependable image quality and respectable color space coverage used to cost a fortune, but this bargain HP display proves those days are long gone. Boasting 99% sRGB color space coverage and the kind of color and contrast consistence that only IPS LCD screen tech can offer, the HP M24fw gives you premium display quality at a rock-bottom price. Even the exterior looks pretty snazzy with a modern-looking stand and super-slim bezels. The Full HD (1920 x 1080) screen resolution is nothing special, but it"s high enough to keep things looking crisp on a display this size. Connectivity is limited to just a single HDMI port and an old-school VGA port, but that does mean compatibility with older computers should be simple.

Dell produces several excellent monitors for photo editing, but the U3223QE offers the best value of them all. This 31.5-inch panel can display 100% of the sRGB color space, and is capable of 100% Rec. 709 coverage and 98% DCI-P3 coverage - the latter being exceptional. Adobe RGB color support isn"t advertised though, and is the only question mark over this otherwise superbly-specced screen.

Standard and ‘photo’ viewing modes are accompanied by text, gaming, movie and dynamic modes, but there’s no preset for the Adobe RGB colour space. Connection ports include DP, DVI and HDMI, along with a USB 3.0 hub. Unusually, the MultiSync EA271U also features built-in speakers, though with an output of only 2W each, they"re of limited aural appeal. Touch-sensitive virtual control buttons are easily accessible on the lower bezel.

Around the back, there are Display Port, Mini DP and dual HDMI inputs, as well as the practically ubiquitous USB 3.0 hub. The 350cd/m2 maximum brightness rating is typical for an LED-backlit panel, while 5ms response time (grey-to-grey) and 178-degree horizontal and vertical viewing angles are respectable.

Cheaper screens tend to max out at full HD 1920 x 1080 resolution. That"s fine in a smaller screen, but at larger sizes (20-inch and above). You"ll start to see the dots. If you can, look for high resolution 4K or Mac "Retina" screens is that you don"t see the pixels. Photos look beautiful and you don"t have to zoom in to see if they"re sharp.

IPS screen technology: IPS (in-plane switching) screens have much better colour and contrast consistency than older, cheaper, older TN (twisted nematic) panels. All the screens in our premium list use IPS technology.

Graphics card: When buying a high-end display, it’s important to make sure your computer’s graphics are up to the task of displaying 4K resolution smoothly. Most recent PCs or Macs should have the necessary firepower to run Photoshop on a 4K screen, but older computers may not.

Color gamut: The base level standard for all displays and devices is sRGB. You can’t go wrong with this because every device will support it. However, in commercial publishing, where the demands are higher, they like to use the larger Adobe RGB color space. High-end photographic monitors can display most/nearly all of the Adobe RGB gamut.

USB-C connection: this makes it easy to hook up your monitor to a computer with USB-C output. We have a separate guide to the best USB-C monitors for photo editing(opens in new tab).

Wondering what makes us qualified to judge the best monitors for photo editing? How we test and review(opens in new tab) is very important to us, and we evaluate a monitor with particular attention given to its core image quality, including brightness, contrast, color vibrancy and accuracy. While this can – and will – be assessed by the experienced eye of our professional reviewer, some manufacturer screen specs can only be definitively judged by an "electronic eye" - a monitor calibrator.

a line of extreme and ultra-narrow bezel LCD displays that provides a video wall solution for demanding requirements of 24x7 mission-critical applications and high ambient light environments

Digital Photo Frames└ Cameras & PhotoAll CategoriesAntiquesArtBabyBooks & MagazinesBusiness & IndustrialCameras & PhotoCell Phones & AccessoriesClothing, Shoes & AccessoriesCoins & Paper MoneyCollectiblesComputers/Tablets & NetworkingConsumer ElectronicsCraftsDolls & BearsMovies & TVEntertainment MemorabiliaGift Cards & CouponsHealth & BeautyHome & GardenJewelry & WatchesMusicMusical Instruments & GearPet SuppliesPottery & GlassReal EstateSpecialty ServicesSporting GoodsSports Mem, Cards & Fan ShopStampsTickets & ExperiencesToys & HobbiesTravelVideo Games & ConsolesEverything Else

Photography is a growing industry where everyone is competing for equipment and technique. However, very few have given much thought to the monitor panel, which is essential for photo editing and printing. When it comes to “professionalism”, piecemeal mindset is unacceptable. Monitors have greater influence on the delivery of flawless work than most people can imagine. In that case, how should photographers choose a monitor that can fulfill their demands for photo editing and printing? There are many factors worth considering, but they are all closely tied to the size, resolution, contrast, picture quality and other differences among different types of monitor panels. The following seven questions provide some guidelines for photographers on how to select the best monitor.

Whether photographers or the general public, the first thing that comes to mind for them while choosing a monitor is definitely size. The size of monitors have evolved from 19- and 21-inch monitors to the mainstream 27- and 32-inch monitors nowadays. From the perspective of photographers, using a larger screen to browse images delivers a greater visual enjoyment. Furthermore, larger screens also accommodate more windows when using professional image processing software, which also improves work efficiency. That being said, is larger really better when it comes to monitor size? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The optimal distance between the user and the monitor is directly proportional to the monitor size. The ideal distance is generally 1.5-times of the size of the monitor (the diagonal length of the display area). In other words, the larger the monitor, the greater distance is required. If users lean too close to a monitor, the images displayed will appear blurry, which stresses the vision and leads to discomfort. On the other hand, keeping a longer distance than needed will leave the user unable to identify image details or even texts. Therefore, larger is not always better when it comes to choosing a monitor. The ideal monitor size is optimal for browsing and working while guaranteeing comfort is ideal.

For photographers, 27-inch monitors are the mainstream in the market, and also a highly recommended size. This is for two reasons. First of all, a 27-inch monitor is large enough to the point that it offers comfort for work and for browsing images. It also fulfills user demands when using image processing software, thereby improving work efficiency. In addition, when opening two images simultaneously, 27-inch monitor offers a sufficient display area for image processing and comparisons. Secondly, the optimal user-monitor distance for the 27-inch monitor is 100 cm, which is the distance that most users are accustomed to when using computers for image processing.

The majority of monitors are equipped with 16:9 aspect ratios, which is determined by dividing the width by the height of the monitor. A monitor with a width of 16 units and height of 9 is considered a wide format monitor and has an aspect ratio of approximately 1.78:1. Compared to the traditional 4:3 monitor (with an aspect ratio of 1.33:1), 16:9 monitors are closer to the anamorphic ratio (2.39:1) that is utilized in the film industry. Aside from offering a more comprehensive field of vision for film watching, wide format monitors also bear the advantage of displaying all windows and toolbars for users who work with photo editing software such as Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop, thereby substantially decreasing the need to scroll or switch between windows and facilitating the user to fully utilize the display.

The advantage of having a monitor with a 16:9 aspect ratio is that the display can be comprehensively utilized when running photo editing software such as LR or PS, which in turn boosts work efficiency.

The liquid-crystal display (LCD) panel is the most important piece of component used in a monitor. The LCD panel directly displays content and colors for users to view. However, different types of LCD panels have different pros and cons, which greatly affect the result and accuracy of the display. In general, twisted nematic (TN), vertical alignment (VA), and in-plane switching (IPS) panels are the most common panel types on the market. The characteristics of these three types of panels are explained in detail in the following paragraphs.

Twisted Nematic (TN) panel’s most notable advantage is its low manufacturing cost. Thus, TN panels are commonly used in entry-level or mid-level products. Another advantage of the TN panel is its short response time, which is why most affordable monitors designed for professional gamers employ the TN panel. However, the TN panel’s performance in color, contrast, and viewing angle are comparatively weak. In particular, the narrow viewing angle of the TN panel renders different results when viewed from different angles (a phenomenon known as color shifting), which makes monitors with TN panel less than ideal for image processing.

The greatest advantage of Vertical Alignment (VA) panel is its high white-to-black contrast. In particular, VA panel offers an outstanding display of black. Furthermore, native 8-bit VA panel provides a maximum of 16.77 million colors (8 bits per red, green, and blue colors), offering superior color reproduction and color transition when compared to native 6-bit TN panel, which can only display 260,000 colors. However, two of the VA panel’s more significant disadvantages are the slow response time and a viewing angle that’s larger than TN panel but smaller than IPS panel.

In-Plane Switching (IPS) panel is the most widely known LCD panel used in professional image processing monitors. The most notable characteristic of IPS panel is the 178° viewing angle that ensures consistent color appearance when viewed from any angle. Hence, it effectively reduces color shifting, a common problem among TN panels. In addition, some recent IPS panels employed in professional image processing monitors even offer 10-bit color depth with a color-rendering ability of 1.07 billion colors, and a 99% of AdobeRGB coverage rate to that delivers realistic color reproduction. In short, these are the reasons why the majority of monitors designed for professional image processing are equipped with IPS panels.

High-end professional monitors are generally fitted with 10-bit IPS panels that can generate more than 1 billion colors, offering greater authenticity in color reproduction.

Resolution refers to the number of “dots” that a monitor can display. When viewed under a macro lens or magnifying glass, LCD monitors are made up of a large number of “dots.” All images and texts displayed on a monitor are comprised of these “dots.” Therefore, when a greater number of “dots” are displayed in a fixed surface area, a more detailed image is rendered. When a screen is labeled as Full HD, which should ring a bell for most people, it indicates that the monitor has 1920 dots (pixels) in width and 1080 dots (pixels) in height. The result of these two numbers multiplied is 2,073,600 dots, which represents the monitor’s resolution.

It is not hard to identify which of the two monitors offers a more detailed image. Photographers are recommended to select a professional monitor with at least 100 PPI, which will offer greater accuracy for editing and confirming image details.

“Contrast” is a common word for both photography and monitors. Contrast ratio is defined as the ratio between the luminance of the brightest white and the darkest black that a monitor can display. In general, a higher contrast ratio indicates that the monitor can display a larger luminance range, which delivers more natural and consistent image quality. Two additional factors that require close attention are native contrast ratio and dynamic contrast ratio, which often show up on product specification. What is the difference between native contrast and dynamic contrast ratio? In short, native contrast ratio is determined in the factory by the panel. Manufacturers usually determine the native contrast ratio according to product positioning and the demands from the target audience. After the monitor is produced, a color analyzer is used to measure the maximum and minimum luminance at the center of the monitor. The quotient of the two values is the native contrast ratio. On the other hand, dynamic contrast ratio refers to using the IC embedded in the monitor to control various relevant settings in accordance with the dynamic content that is being played (e.g., videos or games) and ultimately for enhancing the contrasting effect of the display. For photographers and users who are seeking monitors for image processing and browsing,, contrast is a determining factor for purchasing a monitor. Therefore, native contrast ratio should be taken into consideration. The majority of monitors used for image processing have a native contrast ratio of 1000:1. Thus, professionals should employ this rule as their standard, and select a monitor within budget while fulfilling their demands.

Have you ever walked into a hypermarket and noticed that some monitors reflect like a mirror (glossy monitors), whereas others seem to have been glazed with an unpleasant, murky layer (matte finish)? The difference between these two types of monitors arises from different panel surface processing methods. Although glossy monitors are more “visually” pleasing, they can cause glare or reflections when used under a light source. Currently, there is no way to resolve the glossy monitor’s reflection issue.

Furthermore, glossy monitors are more likely to show fingerprint smudges or accumulate dust, which severely undermines the judgment and work efficiency of users when processing images, to whom accurate image quality and color details are of utmost importance. Matte monitors, on the other hand, are made from crystal silicon, which means that matte monitors effectively diffuse ambient light, thereby successfully suppressing glare and reflection. A matte monitor equipped with an IPS panel, which offers a wide viewing angle and high color-rendering properties, is the best choice for professionals working in image processing or users in search of high-end monitors.

Monitors with a glossy display may seem more aesthetically attractive, but often generate glare, which is highly detrimental for photographers. Monitors with a matte display, which suppress glare and combining advantages of IPS panels, are an excellent choice for photographers.

Your new digital picture frame lets you view photos and videos and listen to music - all without a computer. An automatic, continuous slide show lets you enjoy all of your photos with ease. The included remote control makes it simple to select photos, change settings, and more. Photos can be viewed directly from memory cards or from the frame"s built-in memory. The frame can be connected to a computer to quickly and easily transfer pictures from your hard drive.

Whether you"re a professional in the print and marketing industry or an amateur photographer, you want to use a monitor that displays accurate colors so that your projects look good. While you can use any monitor for photo and video editing, some monitors have a dedicated sRGB mode so that colors aren"t oversaturated while you"re using the sRGB color space. There are a few other things you"ll look for in a monitor for photo and video editing, like pixel density, connectivity, peak brightness, and ergonomics to improve your workflow.

We"ve bought and tested more than 260 monitors, and below are our picks for the best monitors for video editing, photo editing, or graphic design available for purchase. See our recommendations for the best 4k monitors, the best ultrawide monitors, and the best work monitors.

The best monitor for photo editing and video editing that we"ve tested is the Dell U3223QE. It"s a good 4k monitor that focuses on content creation and productivity. It has a dedicated sRGB mode that limits the colors to the standard sRGB space used in most web content, resulting in remarkable color accuracy, meaning you won"t have to get it calibrated unless you need perfect colors. The 4k resolution is great for editing because it allows you to see more detail at once, and the 32-inch screen is big enough to open multiple windows at the same time.

What makes this monitor so great for media creation is that it has excellent accuracy before calibration so you won"t have to calibrate it unless you need a perfect white balance because there are some issues with the white balance. It also displays a wide range of colors in SDR and HDR, and it has great coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in some photo editing. If you need to edit videos in HDR, it also has fantastic gradient handling so you won"t see any banding with shades of similar colors.

The M32U has a few features for photo and video editors like an sRGB mode that has excellent accuracy before calibration, and it has a fantastic SDR color gamut. The 4k resolution also delivers sharp images, and it"s a good choice if you often need to share your screen with someone else as it has wide viewing angles and good ergonomics. If you find the 32-inch screen too big, the Gigabyte M28U is a similar and smaller monitor, but it doesn"t get as bright and has worse ergonomics.

If you want something cheaper or find that the Gigabyte M32U is too big, then the Dell S2722QC is the best monitor for photo editing and video editing in the mid-range category. While it also has a 4k resolution for sharp images, it doesn"t have a dedicated sRGB picture mode, meaning it has worse out-of-the-box accuracy, and you"ll need to get it calibrated if your work requires perfectly accurate colors, but that"s what you have to expect for getting something cheaper. That said, the accuracy is still decent without any calibration. While it has fewer USB-A inputs, it still has one USB-C input with DisplayPort Alt Mode and 65W of power delivery to connect your laptop.

Restructured article to reflect user needs for photo editing; added the Dell U2723QE as the "Best Monitor" and renamed the Dell S2722QC as the "Best Mid-Range". Replaced the Gigabyte PA278QV with the ASUS PA278QV because it"s easier to find and added the Acer XF243Y as the "Best Cheap" monitor; replaced the Gigabyte M34WQ with the LG 40WP95C-W because it has better accuracy.

Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors for photography and other types of media creation currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.

For many years, TVs with LED backlights have dominated the market. Manufacturers release many LED models every year that have different features. You won"t get the same excellent dark room picture quality as an OLED but LED TVs have a few more advantages than OLEDs (check out our article about OLED vs. LED). LED TVs" biggest advantages are their brightness, which allows them to get brighter than OLEDs, and they"re immune to permanent burn-in. LED TVs are also sometimes called LCD instead; LED refers to the technology used to create the backlight, whereas LCD refers to the technology used to produce different colors and shades. As all LCD models currently on the market use LED backlights, the two terms are often used interchangeably.

We"ve bought and tested more than 300 TVs with LED backlights, and below are our recommendations for the best TVs with LED panels that you can buy. See also our picks for the best TVs, the best PS5 TVs, and the best TVs for Xbox Series X.

The Samsung QN90B QLED is the best TV with an LED panel we"ve tested. It"s an impressive TV with amazing picture quality and a great selection of gaming features. It uses a Mini LED backlight, with way more dimming zones than most LED TVs, which allows for greater control over the local dimming feature for better dark room performance, with less distracting blooming around bright objects. It also gets exceptionally bright, meaning it can handle lots of glare in a bright room.

The best LCD TV for a home theater is the Hisense U9DG. It"s a unique LED TV because it uses dual-panel technology. It means it has two LCD panels stacked on top of each other, delivering the equivalent of a local dimming feature with two million dimming zones; most other TVs only have a few hundred at most. This technology helps provide the TV with the best contrast ratio we"ve tested on any LED TV. The black level is nearly perfect, even in bright scenes, and there"s almost no blooming around bright objects.

The best mid-range TV we"ve tested with an LED panel is the Hisense U8H. It"s an excellent TV overall, with fantastic contrast and an impressive Mini LED local dimming feature, delivering deep blacks in a dark room with very little distracting blooming around bright objects. It has exceptional peak brightness and reflection handling, ensuring it can easily overcome glare in a bright room. It has worse processing overall than the Samsung QN90B QLED, though, so it"s a bit of a step down. There"s more noticeable banding in areas of similar color, and it has slightly worse motion processing as well.

Our recommendations above are what we think are currently the best LCD TVs to buy for most people in each price range. We factor in the price (a cheaper TV wins over a pricier one if the difference isn"t worth it), feedback from our visitors, and availability (no TVs that are difficult to find or almost out of stock everywhere).

LCD is an independent concept store with a focus on exciting young and emerging contemporary designers. Our flagship store, located in historic Venice Beach, California serves as a playground for exploring ideas such as slow fashion, gender neutrality, sustainability, and inclusivity. We are perennially inspired by contemporary art and street culture.

Put your best memories on display with the best digital photo frame. Using an LED display, digital photo frames showcase digital versions of your snaps in a slideshow format, so not only are you displaying several photos in one frame, but you"re also saving money on prints. Plus, you can change the images on the display as often as you"d like.

Sharp, chic and easy to use, the leading models put your personal snaps front and centre. And, they"re a terrific (and economical) way to show off your family photos, vacation pics, and photography masterpieces.

What’s the best digital photo frame for most people? We highly recommend the Aura Mason Luxe, which boasts a neat look, slick interface, and detailed display. Alternatively, if you want an option which also supports for video calls, Facebook’s Portal is worth considering. But, if you’re looking for a great value alternative on a tight budget, the 8-inch Nixplay Nix ticks a lot of boxes for not a lot of money.

Whether you want a simple panel or a smart display, we have comprehensively tested the best options then gathered all the best ones here, covering models across a range of price brackets. We’ve also included some useful buying tips to keep in mind when deciding which frame is the best fit for your home.

From affordable frames to premium screens, here are the best digital photo frames available and ranked in the list below. Once you’ve found your favorite frame, you’ll find links beneath each entry that take you straight to the best deals available right now. Need some more in-depth advice? Also check out our guide on how to buy a digital photo frame.

The Aura Mason Luxe is a clear cut above most other photo frames. It’s stylish, has greater character to its design and, most important of all, the screen is excellent in most respects.

Its 4:3 aspect display is perfect for not just adding some color to your room with your photos, but to actually get an up-close look at them. Pixel density is so high they look sharp and detailed even when you get your face right up to the screen. We found that color is natural-looking and well-saturated too, so you can be sure you’re seeing a fair representation of the photos you fling its way.

Nixplay’s 2K Smart Digital Photo Frame features one of the sharpest screens on the market. With a resolution of 2048 x 1536 pixels, the display offers detail for days – and it’s vibrant, too, with impressively deep blacks and more than enough brightness to beat the screen’s reflective coating.

At 9.7 inches, the display also strikes an excellent middle ground: with a flexible stand setup that can support the frame in portrait or landscape orientation, the Smart Digital Photo Frame will fit on almost any shelf, while also giving images enough real estate to really be seen and enjoyed. Handily, it can also be wall-mounted.

One of our favourite things about this frame is that loading up photos via the partner app is a straightforward process. Create, populate and organise multiple playlists using photos from your smartphone, or sync with Google Photos to display AI-generated smart albums. You can also connect with friends to easily receive snaps and assign them to your frame.

Classier than most competitors, the Aura Carver stands out with an embossed border and angular, free-standing design. Its 10.1-inch display isn’t as sharp as the slightly pricier Carver Luxe, but we found its 1280x800 panel fine in testing, with pleasant colors and good viewing angles. It helps that the screen can adjust automatically to ambient conditions and go impressively bright, helped by a semi-matte finish.

We think Aura frames have the slickest software out there, and the Carver is no exception. It doesn’t have a touchscreen, but the subtle touch panel on top makes it easy to flick between photos. Other settings are found in the similarly streamlined smartphone app, although customisation options are limited. Friends and family can contribute to your slideshow, but there’s no support for albums.

A cheap and cheerful photo frame, the Aeezo Portrait 01 is more flexible than its price tag suggests. Its no-frills, plastic build won’t win any design awards, but it’s neat enough, even if the simple stand has limited stability.

We were largely happy with its photo reproduction in our review. Color depth isn’t exceptional, but the 10-inch display strikes a good balance when it comes to detail: hard edges aren’t too soft or too sharp. It is less bright than other frames in the same price bracket, though.

The Netgear Meural isn’t quite like other digital photo frame. By the standards of this category, it’s a pretty high-end buy, but it"s actually the entry-level model in Netgear’s series of art displays. They scale all the way up to a 21.5 inches.

This is a 15.6-inch photo frame you can orient in portrait or landscape. It’s a large canvas for your photos, and the Meural app offers access to a huge library of paintings and other art works. They can inject some culture into your home. You have to pay for a subscription to get full access, but a good few handfuls are available without one.

With a generous border and glass facade, the Skylight Frame is one of the more attractive photo frames we’ve tested. It’s larger than most 10-inch models, but its white surround and classy design give it real presence on a shelf. In use, its responsive touchscreen feels quite a lot like a tablet: you can pinch to zoom and swipe to switch photos. It’s not sophisticated, but it works smoothly and makes it easy to find specific images.

We don’t think the Skylight Frame does a perfect job of representing images. Its compression software can add visible artifacts, soften images and make certain hues look unnatural. That said, its 1280x800 pixel LCD holds up well against similarly priced rivals, even if its 255-nit brightness is a long way below the Aura Carver.

While it"s primarily device for calling friends and family, Meta"s social screen does a side-gig as a slick digital photo frame. Styled like a floating box frame with neat lines and a quality finish, it’s an attractive fit for contemporary shelves – provided there’s space for the supporting leg. The stand can prop the Portal in portrait or landscape, but it sticks out by 12cm – and the power cable exits from its end, so it can’t sit flush against your wall.

Up front, the 10-inch display is vibrant and responsive, with good detail and color reproduction. The panel is quite reflective, but there’s enough brightness to counter glare – though this dips when viewing from a 45-degree angle.

Setup is straightforward and the slick touchscreen interface is matched by the polished partner app. which particularly impressed us. Photos can be sourced from Facebook, Instagram or your smart device, then sorted into albums which can be individually enabled.

The Nixplay Touch 10 passes for a traditional photo frame at arm’s length. Its back is heavily sculpted, but this will usually be hidden away from view. While its slot-in stand didn’t feel especially sturdy in testing, the frame itself isn’t heavy enough to make this a problem.

Its plastic display surface softens reflections, and photos generally look good. We liked the color temperature during our time with the Nixplay, finding that it could produce rich tones, even if its LCD panel lacks the depth of OLED. We were less impressed by its sharpening, which caused edges to appear pixellated.

The Nest Hub Max is both a hub for smart devices and a portal for accessing Google Assistant at home, but it also does well as a digital photo frame. Styled like a 10-inch tablet attached to a fabric-skinned speaker, it forms a neat free-standing package with a small shelf footprint – even if the screen’s plastic shell and bezels don’t feel particularly premium.

The fixed stand setup means you can’t adjust the display angle from its default upward tilt. While this will be an issue if you want to place the frame on a higher shelf, the viewing angles are otherwise good, with decent saturation and plenty of brightness – provided you’re fine with a reflective panel.

At 1280x800, the resolution of the touchscreen could be higher, but we found that there’s still good detail with no noticeable pixellation – and it makes controlling the Nest Hub Max a cinch. Swipe between photos or tap the pop-up controls to hide, star or share particular images, or do the same thing with voice commands.

The Nest Hub Max can display art backgrounds, a full-screen clock or a selection of snaps from your Google Photos account. It supports Live Albums, features the option to show portrait pics in split-screen and offers time, weather and image data overlays – but you can’t manually change the slideshow order. And because it only works with Google Photos, the Nest Hub Max makes sense mainly for those already invested in the company’s cloud backup service.How to pick the best digital photo frame for youWhere will you place it?Most digital photo frames include some kind of stand, but not all can be wall-mounted. Similarly, some only work in one orientation, while others can switch from portrait to landscape. It pays to consider placement, including how a frame’s finish will fit with your decor.

How will you add images?Many of the latest digital photo frames rely on cloud storage to host your slideshow, letting you add photos directly from different devices. Others feature social media integration. But if your images live on hard storage, consider something with a memory card or USB input.

How much control do you want?Some digital photo frames offer seamless simplicity, while others allow you to adjust every setting – from brightness to sleep schedules. It’s worth checking what a given frame lets you tweak, especially if you’re particular about color balance or slideshow transitions.

How smart does it need to be?More than passive panels, several of the best digital photo frames in 2021 are actually fully fledged smart displays. That means voice control, media streaming and smart home integration. Whether you need this additional functionality will depend on the other devices already in your abode.What is the best size digital photo frame?Digital photo frames are available in a wide range of sizes. Which dimension is right for you will depend on your available space, as well as your own personal preference. Smaller digital photo frames are more compact and easier to place in your home, but offer less canvas space for your digital images. Larger photo frames give your treasured snaps room to shine, but require a larger footprint – and the biggest screens risk dominating a room.

While you can find digital photo frames with screens as small as 5 inches, we think the smallest you should realistically look at is 8 inches. A frame such as the Nixplay Nix Digital Photo Frame 8-inch benefits from a small footprint that’s easy to place almost anywhere, while still giving your images enough room on screen to be clearly visible. Any smaller and you risk having to squint to see your snaps.

The largest digital photo frames feature displays to rival your average laptop. The Nixplay Seed Wave, for example, ships with a 13-inch panel. This puts your pictures clearly front and centre, but it’s not exactly subtle. It risks looking like a small TV and blends less well into the background – although it certainly makes your shots unmissable.

We think the best size digital photo frame is between 9 inches and 10 inches. Models like the Google Nest Hub Max, Aura Carver and Facebook Portal all feature screens which measure in at around the 10-inch mark, while our favorite digital photo frame right now – the minimalist Aura Mason Luxe – has a 9.7-inch display. These hit the sweet spot for visibility and flexibility. A display at this size will also provide better pixel density than a much larger screen, improving clarity and sharpness (especially with Nixplay’s 2K frame, which features a high-resolution 9.7-inch screen).

Digital photo frames are unique devices with a range of specific factors to test. We put each frame through a range of scenarios to ensure each one is worthy of a recommendation.

We place each digital photo frame in a series of similar viewing scenarios to assess the sharpness and brightness of its display. This will usually include a dark environment, a daylit room and a bright spot in direct sunlight. Using an identical set of photos, we look at the accuracy of color reproduction, the clarity of each image and the viewing angles of the frame. We also take into account the proportions of the display and whether any cropping is likely to affect standard-sized digital images.