small lcd monitors for coding supplier

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

The best monitors for programming will make coding your creative projects all the more comfortable. You might think that any display would do for this, after all, you don"t need any special features when you"re just looking at syntax, variables, and data structures all day. However, much like how an ergonomic and comfortable keyboard can make a huge difference in your typing experience, having the ideal programming monitor can also drastically improve your workflow.

In fact, there are several things to consider when choosing the best monitor for programming. Your top considerations must be the screen size, aspect ratio, and orientation. While such displays aren"t your only options, those that have a larger aspect ratio or a portrait mode will serve you better as they are better at displaying long sections of code. If that isn"t an option for you, you must get one with multitasking features like Picture-by-Picture.

If you"re using one of the best laptops for programming, you might need USB-C connectivity as well. Since you’ll be staring at that display for hours, flicker-free technology and blue light filters that minimise eye strain are also features you’ll want. And, don"t forget to consider colour accuracy and colour coverage if your projects include images and video.

To help you choose the best monitor for programming, we’ve applied our expertise and gathered the most ideal displays we"ve used, tested, or fully reviewed, keeping in mind different needs and budgets. For more about how we rate and review monitors, see our how we test page.

The LG UltraFine Display 32UL950’s steep price tag might be tough to swallow, especially if you’re only starting out as a programmer, but it"s a superb screen that features 600 nits of brightness, HDR600 support, and 98% DCI-P3 colour coverage. It’s a pleasure to not just code on, but also for playing a PC game or for viewing films.

At 32 inches, this display is large enough that you won"t be squinting at your text code and you have enough room for viewing multiple windows side-by-side. An elegant design with minimal bezels adds to the sense of an immersive workflow, while Thunderbolt 3 connectivity allows for data transfer speeds of 40GB per second.

If you"re new to programming or still studying, then you"ll probably want a monitor for programming that"s kinder on your bank account, but ideally without sacrificing quality. Fortunately, there are a few good affordable options out there, including the VP2458 Professional from ViewSonic. At under $300/£300, it falls within everyone’s budget, but it still offers some attractive features for programmers.

It comes with the kind of blue light filter offered by pricier monitors so you can reduce eyestrain even if you’re on an all-nighter to make a deadline. It also delivers lifelike colours with its 100% sRGB coverage and quick and easy colour calibration. The 24in panel makes it a good size to fit in a dorm or small apartment setup while an adjustable setup allows you to work in the best posture even if you’re in a tight space. On top of that, the near-frameless design offers a seamless visual experience when using multi-monitor setups if you want to go down that avenue.

The BenQ EX3203R is primarily aimed at gamers, but when we reviewed the screen, we found it to be ideal for general productivity work too. We think it"s a brilliant monitor for programming too thanks to its high resolution and large screen size. So if you"re both a coder and a keen gamer, this is an option that"s well worth considering. It boasts 1440p resolution, which is ideal for coding as it gives you more pixels to work with than a 1080p monitor, but doesn"t go overboard like a 4K monitor.

The Dell UltraSharp U3223QZ is made specifically for productivity and multitasking. That means that it comes loaded with multitasking features that programmers will certainly appreciate, including auto KVM (Keyboard, Mouse, Video), Picture-by-Picture (PbP) and Picture-in-Picture (PiP), and the ability to daisy chain two 4K monitors. Several highly accurate creative colour modes are on hand as well for your projects that might involve graphics, images, or videos. All those should make up for the lack of portrait mode.

As we now live in a world where working from home or remotely is the norm, its best feature is that built-in intelligent webcam that delivers up to 4K at 30 fps or 1080p at 60fps video and comes with a SafeShutter feature. That should effortlessly connect you with clients, project managers, and other colleagues whether you"re based at home full-time or following a hybrid model.

We honestly don"t know why there aren"t more 16:18 monitors for coders, writers, and other multitaskers. Even though we haven"t done a full review of the LG DualUp Monitor 28MQ780, LG"s latest offering with a 16:18 aspect ratio and a fully articulating mount and stand, it only took us a couple of hours of use to be fully convinced of its brilliance.

Touting a squarish format, this 2560 x 2880 monitor is always wide enough to display what you need from every open window, regardless of whether it"s in landscape or portrait mode. It also helps you organise those windows by allowing you to snap them up into a stack of two or three, brilliantly making them effortlessly accessible and showing more than enough content.

We"ve already included an ultrawide monitor in the list, but one that sits at the lower end of the definition and is suitable for more desk types. The Samsung CRG9 sits at the other end, offering a huge 49-inch screen, with a 32:9 ratio. It"s a huge amount of workspace, which means you can have all your apps, websites and more open at once. And thanks to multiple inputs and picture-in-picture mode, you can hook up two devices and use them together on the same monitor, making for a more space-efficient option than using multiple monitors.

The BenQ EW3280U may be from the manufacturer"s entertainment series and designed specifically for multimedia consumption, but we found that it makes for an excellent productivity monitor. The price is great for budget-conscious coders, and features like its light sensors that detect ambient light and optimizes brightness and colour temperature accordingly are brilliant for your eyes.

Huawei’s spiffy offering, the Huawei MateView, is undeniably sleek and brilliantly designed. For example, it keeps its super neat, incredibly thin design while still offering an impressive selection of ports by utilising its stand. Just as impressive are its specs that include 100% sRGB and 98% DCI-P3 colour coverage, up to DeltaE<1 colour accuracy, 500 nits of brightness, and HDR 400. Of course, being a USB-C monitor, it also boasts a USB-C port that supports data and video transfer as well as up to 65W Power Delivery.

Another huge 49in ultrawide option is the Philips Brilliance 499P9H. Like the Samsung monitor above, this also offers a more streamlined alternative to working with multiple monitors. With all that screen real estate you"re getting, you can spread out as much as you can, which in turn saves you time and allows you to focus on your work.

True to its multi-tasking nature, it also boasts a built-in USB-C docking station, a built-in KVM switch to easily switch between sources, and power delivery up to 65W, allowing you to power and charge your notebook via USB-C. Stock is low in the US at the moment. This award-winning monitor for programming isn"t cheap, however, so only invest if the whole package is worth it to you.

There are some important considerations to bear in mind when buying a monitor for coding. Firstly, there"s the matter of size. You"ll want a screen that is large enough that you"re not forced to strain to see, but not so big that you feel uneasy working on it. A huge monitor that looms over you can be uncomfortable, although that can be remedied with curved screens, which avoid you having to strain your neck to see all parts of the screen.

Another important factor is resolution. The higher the resolution, the more room you have to work, and text can look sharper too. However, ultra-high resolutions can leave text looking very small, which again is uncomfortable, although on both macOS and Windows 10, you can tweak the scaling of text so that it"s more comfortable to read on high-resolution monitors.

Ergonomics are important too. The best monitors for programming are easily adjustable, offering a good range of movement. You might also like a monitor that can be rotated to portrait orientation. Other features to look out for include blue light filtering and flicker reduction, which help take the strain off your eyes. Some monitors also offer automatic brightness adjustment, which fine-tunes the display to suit the ambient light of your setting, again helping to avoid eyestrain. It might also be worth looking at the best monitor stands to ensure you get your setup just right.Are 4K monitors suitable for programming?When you’re coding, a monitor’s resolution will not factor in quite the way it would with other content creators. Having access to stunning graphics, at least for work, doesn’t hold the same priority as being able to work in comfort. However, that doesn’t mean you should ignore UHD monitors when looking for that next display.

UHD displays do offer one particular benefit to coders over their lower-res counterparts. That higher resolution provides more screen real estate and allows you to fit more windows on your screen while working. If anything, that higher resolution allows a more streamlined workflow.How big should my monitor be for programming?A display’s size depends largely on how you work and what your setup is like. If you plan on sitting further back, you’ll want to use a larger monitor so you can see everything clearly. But, if you work in more cramped quarters, you’ll want to have the entire display within your field of vision. And, that means downsizing. Otherwise, you’ll end up moving your eyes and neck to the point of discomfort.Is a curved screen good for programming?Choosing between a flat or curved panel is mostly a matter of preference. Flat panels lend themselves much better to multi-display setups, with some of them can rotate 90 degrees to use in portrait mode.

If you’re planning on sitting a little closer to your monitor, a curved monitor might be better, especially if you don’t plan on adding a second panel. The curvature gives you a more immersive viewing experience, letting you see the corners of the screen without having to refocus on different parts of the screen. That curved design will also alleviate eye fatigue and strain.Why do coders use vertical monitors?When you use a vertical monitor, you’re able to read and skim through much larger portions of your work at once. Since lines of code don’t get very long, the width of a monitor doesn’t come into play when writing or reading through your code the way it does for photo or video editing work. So, turning a monitor into portrait mode makes the best use of your screen space. Of course, you’ll want to pair that with a monitor in landscape mode to see the results.

The best monitor for programming and coding is the Dell Ultrasharp U2722DE (view at Amazon). Its ergonomic stand and USB-C connectivity provide function, while its attractive 1440p screen delivers top-notch image quality. Also worthy of mention is the HP VH240a (view at Amazon). It"s a great monitor on a tight budget that features a 24-inch size and 1080p resolution.

We recommend at least 1440p resolution whenever possible. Our top budget monitor, the HP VH240a, doesn"t meet this number, but our other recommendations deliver a 1440p or 4K resolution. A high resolution can increase text clarity, which is essential when viewing code. It also gives you more flexibility when arranging windows on your desk, allowing you to make interface elements and text a smaller size without hurting legibility.

Programmers love to use multiple monitors but hate big, chunky bezels that keep those monitors separated. Modern thin-bezel monitors can reduce this problem by shrinking the gap between displays to just a few millimeters. You don’t even have to pay a premium for this feature, as even our budget pick delivers razor-thin bezels.

Modern monitors have way more connectivity than those sold a decade ago. Many function as USB-C hubs, which means you can access additional ports on them via a single USB-C connection. Most USB-C hub monitors can also charge a connected laptop, offering a one-cable video, connectivity, and power solution.

A high resolution is often better for viewing more code at once, but this can become a problem for programmers with anything less than superb eyesight. Also, some older programs and programming environments have lackluster scaling that can cause issues on a 4K monitor. We generally recommend 4K for most programmers but encourage thinking about how you will use the monitor before making a purchase.

Programmers don’t need to worry about panel type. It’s true that several panel types exist, but monitors marketed for productivity almost exclusively use in-plane switching panel (IPS) technology, which provides excellent brightness, color angles, and color accuracy. They suffer in contrast ratio (the difference between lightest and darkest colors) and, in some cases, response times, but these downsides have little impact on programmers.

Distributor of electronics, cables, desktops, computer accessories, office equipment, servers, data storage, or networking products. Workstations, computer tablets, hard drives, controllers, radios, digital cameras, speakers, and telephones are offered. Device memory, LCD or LED monitors, projectors, touchscreen displays, ethernet switches, routers, communication boards, video conferencing equipment, and power supplies are available. Laser or DVD printers, document scanners, consoles, surge suppressors, and rack mounting equipment are also provided. Management, utility, network, desktop publishing, database, and business intelligence software are available. Cloud, data center, collaboration, and cyber security services are provided. Serves the healthcare, government, education, and business sectors.

Manufacturer of industrial LCD flat panel computer monitors for rugged environments. Available in various models. Features include IP66 and NEMA 4X protection, resistive anti-glare touch screen, DVI and VGA video inputs, on screen display (OSD), USB hubs, wall mount, aluminum/stainless steel bezels and thin clients. Provides edge-to-edge glass design for cleaning. Designed for environments that are less demanding but maintain endurance to temperature, shock and vibration. Offers consulting, integration, industrial maintenance, support and training services. Serves the automotive, chemical, fiber, textile, food, infrastructure, marine, mining, cement, oil, gas, power generation, semiconductor, paper, tire, water and wastewater industries. RoHS compliant. UL listed. CE and CSA certified.

Computer monitors are an essential tool for both large corporations and small businesses. One or more high-quality monitors can help to optimize employee workflow and boost productivity. Whether you’re an employer or a working professional, order CTL computer monitors to access stunning displays and top-grade performance.

The best computer monitor is going to depend on your own unique preferences and needs. For instance, if you tend to keep many tabs or applications open at once, a larger computer monitor will allow you to see more in one space. On the other hand, if you don’t want to simultaneously view multiple windows or if your workspace is limited in size, a smaller computer monitor may be ideal.

While all LED monitors are LCD monitors, the reverse isn’t true. There are LCD monitors that aren’t LED monitors. The difference between the two lies in the backlights. A typical LCD monitor uses fluorescent backlights to create the display, while LED monitors use light-emitting diodes. While the quality of each type of computer monitor depends on the particular product you’re looking at, LED monitors tend to have a higher-quality picture than LCD monitors.

Yes, CTL monitors can connect to Chromebooks. Connect your CTL computer monitor to your Chromebook by using the monitor’s HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, or VGA port. From there, you can have the computer monitor mirror your Chromebook’s display or use the monitor as an additional screen. Check out our Chromebook accessories to further enhance your experience.

Computer monitors can also be paired with a Chromebox. This high-powered computing solution allows you to optimize performance and meet all of your most pressing business or personal needs.

Most computer monitors range from 19� to 29�, but larger screens of 40� to 55� are also increasingly popular. Additionally, 60� to 90� monitors are perfect for the boardroom or classroom interaction. It really depends on how you�re using your computer. If it�s just for emailing and word processing, a smaller screen should be sufficient. But if you�re using your computer for designing, gaming or for viewing movies, a larger screen may be a better choice.

LED (Light- Emitting Diode) monitors essentially the same as LCD monitors � the only difference is in the backlighting technology. LCD monitors use fluorescent lamps to light the display, while LED monitors use the more energy-efficient light-emitting diodes. LED monitors use up to 40% less energy and contain no mercury, making them a more environmentally friendly choice. They may also help reduce eye strain, which is important if you spend a lot of time in front of your computer.

LED monitors tend to be more expensive than LCDs. But when selecting a computer monitor, it�s best to go with the highest quality and largest size that fits your budget.

Choosing the perfect computer monitor can be tough, so that"s why we"re here to help. Watch our video and learn how to pick out the perfect one. We"ll go over three different monitors for PC builds ranging from basic to high performance.

Programming often requires you to multitask with a ton of windows open, and if that"s what you need, you"ll want a big monitor to open all your windows at once. While high-resolution monitors are a great choice for that as you can view more of your text at once with sharp clarity, there are also large ultrawide monitors available if you prefer something with more horizontal screen space. Don"t only consider the size as you also want to look for other things in a monitor like good ergonomics, wide viewing angles, and a USB hub if you connect external devices.

We"ve bought and tested more than 260 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best monitors to purchase for programmers. Also, make sure to check out our recommendations for the best ultrawide monitors, the best monitors for dual setup, and the best office monitors.

The best programming monitor we"ve tested is the LG 38WN95C-W. It"s a great overall display that"s versatile for different uses, and it offers very good performance for work. It has a large 38-inch screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio, which is great for programming because you can easily open multiple windows at once and multitask without having to open and close windows. It has a unique 3840x1600 resolution which results in good text clarity. If you want even better text clarity, the LG 40WP95C-W is a similar display with a 5120x2160 resolution, so text is extremely sharp, but it also costs a lot more for features you don"t necessarily need for programming, like accurate colors.

If you"re looking for something a bit cheaper in the upper mid-range price category or aren"t a fan of the ultrawide format of the LG 38WN95C-W, check out the Dell U3223QE. It"s also an impressive work monitor with a large 32-inch screen and 4k resolution, so while it doesn"t offer as much screen space as the LG, it has improved pixel density for sharper text clarity. It means that you can easily read your coding text and view more lines at once, and the screen is big enough for multitasking with various windows open.

It has extra features to improve your workflow, like a massive USB hub with three USB-C ports and five USB-A ports. It supports DisplayPort Alt Mode if you want to connect a laptop, and it has a KVM switch that makes it easy to use the same keyboard and mouse if you have two devices connected to the monitor. If you find the 32-inch screen too big, you can also find the Dell U2723QE, which has a 27-inch screen and costs a lot less for similar performance, and it"s a better option if you"re looking for something in the mid-range price category.

If you find the Dell U3223QE too expensive, there are good options that are cheaper in the lower mid-range price category, like the Dell S2722QC. It"s a step down from the U3223QE in terms of features because it has a smaller USB hub with a single USB-C port and two USB-A ports, and it doesn"t have a KVM switch, so it isn"t as good for multitasking, but that"s what you have to expect for getting something cheaper. Still, it offers the same 4k resolution with fantastic text clarity, and although the screen is smaller, you can easily open two windows side-by-side.

It"s a great choice to use in well-lit rooms because it gets bright enough to fight glare, and the reflection handling is also very good, even better than the U3223QE, meaning you won"t have issues using it with some lights around. Luckily, it has wide viewing angles that make the image remain consistent from the sides, and with excellent ergonomics, it"s easy to adjust the screen and share it with someone else if you need your coworker to look over your coding.

If you"re looking for the best programming monitor on a budget, the Dell S2721QS is a good alternative. While it has the same 27-inch, 4k screen as the Dell S2722QC, it"s cheaper because it"s rather basic in features, but it"s still a great choice for a budget model and delivers sharper text than other similarly-priced monitors. The incredible text clarity makes it easy to see more of your work at once, and the screen is big enough to multitask. If you aren"t a fan of 4k screens and prefer a 1440p resolution, the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV is a good alternative and has more USB ports, but text doesn"t look as sharp.

It"s great for sharing your screen with coworkers as it has wide viewing angles, and the stand offers impressive ergonomics, making it easy to adjust to an ideal viewing position. It"s also a great choice for well-lit rooms as it gets bright enough to fight glare, and the reflection handling is very good.

If you want a cheap entry-level monitor that won"t take up a lot of space, then the ASUS VG246H is a good option. With a smaller 24-inch screen and lower 1080p resolution than the Dell S2721QS, it"s better to use it as a secondary display next to your main one, or it"s also a good choice to use two next to each other for more screen space. Still, the text clarity is decent, and the picture quality is good thanks to its good reflection handling and decent SDR peak brightness, meaning you won"t have problems with it in a bright room.

It"s pretty barebones in terms of features, which is what you have to expect for a cheaper monitor. Despite its low cost, it has remarkable ergonomics that make it easy to adjust the screen to your liking, and with wide viewing angles, the images look the same when viewing directly from directly in front or from the sides. It also has a flicker-free backlight that helps reduce eye strain during long work sessions.

The Gigabyte M34WQ is an ultrawide monitor like the LG 38WN95C-W with a smaller 34-inch screen and 3440x1440 resolution, so it"s a good choice if you want something cheaper, but if you want the best monitor for developers with a wide screen, go for the LG.

The Dell S3221QS is larger than the Dell S2721QS, which is good if you want the extra screen space, but it also costs more and has worse ergonomics, so the S2721QS provides the best overall performance.

Replaced the Gigabyte M34WQ and the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV with the Dell U3223QE and the Dell S2721QS because they"re each better aligned with user needs for programming; renamed the Dell S2722QC to the "Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor"; updated the Notable Mentions based on changes.

Restructured article to reflect how programmers are looking for monitors; removed the Gigabyte M32UC, Dell S3422DWG, Dell S3221QS, Dell S2722DGM, and the Lenovo D27-30; added the LG 38WN95C-W, Gigabyte M34WQ, Dell S2722QC, ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV, and the ASUS VG246H because they"re all better-suited for productivity; updated Notable Mentions based on changes.

Restructured article to reflect user needs for programming in the dark; Removed the Dell U2723QE, Dell S2722QC, Dell S2721QS, and the Dell C1422H because they all have a low contrast ratio; renamed the Gigabyte M32UC as the "Best Monitor For Programming"; replaced the Gigabyte M34WQ with the Dell S3422DWG and renamed to "Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor"; added the Dell S2722DGM and the Lenovo D27-30 to their respective categories; updated Notable Mentions based on changes.

Moved the Dell U2723QE to "Best Monitor" and moved the Dell S3221QS to "Best Mid-Range"; replaced the Samsung Odyssey G3 with the Dell S2721QS because it has a higher resolution; added the Dell S2722QC as "Best For Bright Rooms"; added the Apple Studio Display to Notable Mentions.

Complete restructuring to reflect user needs; replaced the Dell S2722QC with the Dell S3221QS, the ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE with the Dell C1422H, and the Gigabyte G27Q with the Samsung Odyssey G3 because they"re all better in dark rooms. Replaced the Gigabyte M32U with the Gigabyte M32UC and renamed to "Best For Gaming"; removed the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD; added the Dell U2723QE as the "Best For Mac".

Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors for coding and programming that are currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people, in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.

If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.

A crucial part of every system build, a well-made computer monitor ensures that you will realize the performance output by your computer hardware. Perhaps you spent days, weeks, and months choosing the right CPU and the best graphics card to play the games at the resolutions you want. However, suppose you blew your budget on all the horsepower and left none for the display. In that case, you’re not going to appreciate the intensity of all those pixels that your computer renders at incredible speeds. With PC games getting more graphically intense, you must ensure your display can keep up.

You’ve probably seen terms like HD and Full HD on the boxes of monitors and TVs, but what does that mean? As you may have guessed, HD refers to “High Definition,” a quick way to refer to a high-quality video output. So if you see the term “Full HD” on a monitor box, that’s just a shorthand to denote its resolution, which would be 1920 by 1080, also called 1080p. The reason why it’s specified as “Full HD” is that there are also some TVs and monitors that output at 720p (high definition but not relatively as high as 1080p), which is 1280 by 720 pixels. 1080p is considered the current standard for monitors, and popular manufacturers, including Dell, Acer, Samsung, LG, BenQ and Viewsonic, offer a variety of 1080p monitors in their product lineups.

As you can imagine, the more pixels there are to display, the more critical it is that your monitor has a high refresh rate, especially when it comes to gaming. Typically, the standard has been a 120-hertz refresh rate in gaming monitors, but many features a 144-hertz refresh rate. The quicker a monitor can refresh the display, and the smoother the visual experience will be. This is because the refresh rate in the monitor works in tandem with a low response time (which specifies how quickly the monitor can send and receive new information) to make a seamless visual transition. Sometimes, if the response rate is not quick enough, some residual pixels can remain on the screen as the monitor is trying to refresh new ones. This is called ‘ghosting.’ Although it’s standard to have a four-millisecond response time on many gaming monitors, Samsung, LG, BenQ, Viewsonic, and more all offer 2k and 4k monitors with one-millisecond response times. It is also important to ensure refresh rates are identical if you plan to sync two monitors for your display.

Regarding the internal specs, response time and refresh rate are the main factors contributing to a smooth, immersive viewing experience. Still, the physical panel type of the monitor can also play into this. First, there’s the matter of how the monitor lights up: either with LCD or LED. The main difference lies in the material that is used to light the liquid crystals in the display. In LCD, it’s cold cathode fluorescent lamps (CCFLs), and in LEDs, it’s tiny light emitting and low-energy consuming diodes. This is the preferred type in most monitors because it consumes less power and produces less harsh light, so darker colors appear more vivid. Additionally, LED monitors can be much thinner than LCD ones.

Newer LCD monitors have improved with the implementation of IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels. For some, it’s a matter of preference, but where the IPS panels have shown their strength with accurate color reproduction, which is great for content creators who want to do photo editing or graphic design. The panel type you choose depends more on preference than anything else. Samsung is well known for championing the IPS panel in their monitors, and many people also enjoy using them for gaming.

For some people, it’s essential, not just the monitor specs. Having a monitor that is fast, intuitive, and also looks nice on their desk is a crucial part of a computer build designed to make a statement. Asus’ Predator X34 shows off with its 34-inch curved IPS panel that also features Nvidia’s Gsync technology, which matches the gaming framerates with the monitor’s native refresh rate to prevent screen tearing. For those who want the style without the price tag, Samsung offers a 29-inch curved monitor with a 4-millisecond response time.

As touch navigation becomes more normalized due to mobile browsing, you may also want to consider a touch monitor for maximum accessibility. Planar offers a 22-inch optical touchscreen monitor that is highly portable due to its USB connection type. For something you can use in meetings for presentations, Dell provides a capacitive touchscreen monitor that also features an IPS panel.

Finally, another consideration is whether there are enough HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) ports. HDMI allows simultaneous digital video and audio transmission from one source to another. While HDMI ports are often standard, especially on gaming monitors, verifying that a monitor has enough HDMI compatibility for your setup before purchasing is essential.

When you’ve picked out the perfect display, don’t forget the essential accessories to go with it. For a two or three-screen setup, Ergotron, Rosewill, and SIIG offer a variety of stationary and swivel monitor mounts for both the wall and your desk. Soon, you’ll have a command center that you’ll never want to leave. So, ready to get started?

They are a shorthand to describe how many pixels in total are displayed on the monitor. For 2k, that’s 1920 x 1080 in a 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio. For 4k, it’s 3840 by 2160 in a 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio.

Since monitors have to be lit in order for the viewer to see anything, the difference between the two types is in what is used to light up the crystals within the display. For LCD, that’s cold cathode fluorescent lamps (CCFL’s) and in LEDs, it’s tiny light emitting and low-energy consuming diodes. LED monitors tend to be thinner and more power-efficient, but improvements in the panel types have made LCDs more competitive.

To resize a LCD is literally to cut the glass, polarizers, circuits and circuit boards to a new size. Years ago, it was thought impossible to preserve the original performance of a previously manufactured LCD once the glass circuits are cut. However, Litemax has done the impossible, over and over again, becoming the world"s leading pioneer and leader in LCD resizing solutions.

Squarepixel series is designed for high brightness with power efficiency LED backlight. It provides LCD panel with specific aspect ratios and sunlight readable for digital signage, public transportation, exhibition hall, department store, and the vending machines.

The spirit of Durapixel indeed lies with its name: durability. Why Durapixel? Commercial-grade LCD displays, due to the competitive pricing structure, are unable to offer more than MTBF of 30,000 hours, which will not be sufficient for any applications that require around-the-clock operations. System designers, integrators and users serious about rugged, industrial displays for demanding environments need to look no further – the unfailingly robust and high-quality Durapixel is the key to each of your success.

UbiPixel, industrial LCDs are used in many professional applications. High bright sunlight readable and low power consumption display technologies offer the highest quality LCDs for specific industrial applications. Our embedded LCD can be manufactured in an open frame, VESA mount, or fully enclosed housing for HMI display, KIOSK, Vending machine, home automation, point-of-sale terminals, digital signage and more. UbiPixel, industrial LCDs are used in many professional applications. High bright sunlight readable and low power consumption display technologies offer the highest quality LCD screen for specific industrial applications. Our embedded LCD can be manufactured in an open frame, VESA mount or fully enclosed housing for HMI display, KIOSK, Vending machine, home automation, point-of-sale terminals, digital signage and more.

Marine displays from Litemax are internationally recognized and certified with a proven track record of satisfying all types of scenarios, applications and environments for maritime professionals and organizations. Whether the project involves system building, maintenance, repair or equipment upgrade of a yacht, a submarine or any relevant maritime structure, Litemax"s marine displays guarantee high quality and performance from the dock to the engine room.

Litemax"s 2.5” Pico-ITX boards feature fanless operation, low power, compact designed for space-limited embedded applications. With built-in AMIO expansion interface to develop high flexibility and scalable capabilities.

Litemax"s 3.5" SBCs feature rich I/O ports, wide-temperature support, and wide input voltage range and low-power to robust high -performance computing modules designed for outdoor applications or harsh environmental requirements.

Litemax"s Mini-ITX embedded board provides the performance, expansibility, and durability to meet needs across a wide variety of applications, such as industrial control, industrial IOT, gaming, smart healthcare, and digital signage.

This high performance series supports Intel, AMD, Nvidia processor with multi I/O expansions, mini PCIe/M.2 expansion cards, and wide temperature range, being ideal for automation system, machine automation, factory automation, and IoT platforms.

Featuring a modular designed, this series can be fitted with a number of modules to expand its base capabilities. On-site maintenance and future upgradability are easier than ever by deploying our panel PCs and monitors.

Litemax rugged panel PCs go beyond that of the standard industrial panel computes with elegant, full IP68/65-rated construction, powerful performance and flexible mounting options making it ideal for harsh environments and demanding applications, such as machine controller, command centers, and fast, efficient computing.

The Litemax ITRP series is fanless Passenger Information System, It features stretched LCD display, with high brightness to ensure easy readability even in light-insufficient environments. It serves as a reliable platform to provide passenger information on wide versatility of vehicles, such as bus and trams.

Litemax develops an embedded artificial intelligence application platform for AI edge computing to meet client vertical market applications and various needs and solve the changing challenges of the operating environment. In response to the increasing demand for AI computing, computer vision, deep learning, edge computing, etc., Litemax offers a series of fanless BOX PC with Intel Edge Computing and NVIDIA® Jetson Nano™ to effectively improve the cooling performance of fanless systems. Field applications can smoothly provide powerful computing performance, support high-level AI computing chips, and provide a solution platform for a variety of application scenarios to integrate software and hardware to create more flexible and better vertical functions. Simplify the manpower required for the client to invest in AI system integration.

Intel® offers the Intel® Smart Display Module (Intel® SDM) specification and reference design that can be integrated into the sleekest all-in-one designs. Intel® SDM delivers the same level of intelligence and interoperability as the Open Pluggable Specification, but in our smallest form factor yet eliminates the housing and advances the thinnest integrated displays.

The new Intel® Smart Kiosk Module (Intel® SKM) is a revolutionary solution that makes it easier to scale and maintain interactive kiosks, which are increasingly being used by businesses and governments worldwide to offer customers around-the-clock access to information and services.As the market for interactive kiosks increases, so does the demand for smarter multi-function kiosks with advanced capabilities such as workload consolidation, artificial intelligence, smartphone and social media integration, 5G connectivity, telepresence, remote manageability, and data analytics.

Through intelligent thermal management technologies, Litemax is enabling smarter platforms for various vertical markets deploying display systems. Through the intelligent thermal control board, Litemax helps system integrators and engineers around the world improve efficiency and reliability.

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

Update for Oct. 2019: It’s been close to 3 years since I bought the monitor we’re about to talk about here and I still love it. I would still purchase the same one today.

Update for Jan. 2020: The monitor now costs $550 instead of $330 which for most folks puts it into a much different price bracket. I added a very good “successor” monitor that’s $270 which has basically the same specs and a similar model number.

Update for Sep 2022: Good news, a few of the updated monitor selections are back to normal prices of about $250-300. Lots of great picks to choose from which are linked below!

You would think buying a monitor is easy. Just read a few reviews and add it to your cart, easy peasy. Well, maybe so but if you go that route without doing any type of research you may end up with something that you don’t want, performs horribly in many different tests, or even worse – it won’t work at all.

I purchased a new monitor a month ago (it was back in Jan 2017 for reference!) and it was the result of days of research. If you just want to cut to the chase, I ended up purchasing the Dell UltraSharp U2515H 2560x1440 monitor for $330 and it was one of the best development environment upgrades I’ve made in 5 years.

The above monitor is great and I’m still using it 5+ years later but the Dell U2518D makes for a very good alternative that is slightly newer. It has the same resolution and nearly the same low level specs and panel. It’s basically the successor to the U2515H and happens to only be $300 too. If I were buying a new monitor today it would be this one.

Since then I’ve also recently purchased a 24” ViewSonic VG2455-2K 1440p monitor as an external monitor for a work laptop and it’s really good and about $300. There’s also a 27” 1440p variant of it for 10 bucks more if you wanted something bigger.

If you can find the above ViewSonic monitor for ~$300 it’s a decent buy, just make sure you’re getting the 24” or 27” 1440p (2560x1440) version and not the 1080p (1920x1080) version, there’s a world of a difference which we’ll explore in this post. Likewise, if you can snipe either Dell for that price it’s still a very good buy.

But with that said, everything in this post still applies to all 3 monitors and more so it’s certainly worth reading everything here from top to bottom even today.

Unlike most hardware purchases, monitors can end up lasting you a very long time. The only reason I ended up upgrading was my old Dell 2007FP finally died out after around 8 years of full time use. I was using it as a second monitor in a dual monitor set up.

You could expect 5-10 years out of a monitor because technology in the monitor department moves at a snail’s pace. They are still peddling 1080p monitors today in 2021, and they were released when exactly? Sometime in the early 2000s? That’s about 20 years.

Physical size doesn’t constitute how much you can fit on a monitor. For example my mom thinks that a 25” 1080p monitor is going to let her fit more things on her screen than a 22” 1080p monitor. Don’t be my mom!

The only thing that matters for “fitting more stuff on the screen” is the resolution of the monitor. Here’s the 3 most common resolutions:1080p is 1920x1080

My Chromebook has a 13.3” 1080p display, and so does my secondary 22” 1080p monitor. Both monitors offer the same exact screen real estate. Meaning if I have a Sublime Text 3 code editor open, both of them can comfortably display 2x 80 character code windows side by side along with a sidebar.

If you want to fit more things on your screen, you need to increase the resolution, not the physical size. However, as you increase the resolution, things become smaller, so eventually you will need to increase the physical size too.

For example, A 13.3” MacBook Pro advertises a 2560x1600 resolution but that’s kind of bullshit. Yeah sure, the display is technically capable of rendering 2560x1600 pixels but the resolution you actually end up having as real estate on the monitor is 1680x1050 which is LESS than a 1080p monitor.

The gist of it is, the higher the PPI, the more tightly packed the pixels are which in turn make the image sharper. This is why modern smartphones look liquid smooth. For example an iPhone 7 is 750 x 1334 at 4.7” gives you 325.61 PPI. That is awesome for text reading.

If you’re curious the recently purchased 24” ViewSonic VG2455-2K 1440p monitor in October 2021 is also very comfortable to read text at 122.38 PPI (5 more PPI than 25”), but it’s worth pointing out I personally wouldn’t want to go physically smaller than this.

The goal here is to be standing or sitting at a certain distance away from your monitor and be able to comfortably read text at 100% scaling without eye strain.

I have 20/20 vision with glasses and have been using computers for about 20 years now. The new monitor I purchased is 2560x1440 at 25” which gives me a PPI of 117.

At this PPI I’m very comfortable using everything at 100% scaling with absolutely no eye strain and I’m standing a bit less than an arm’s length away from the monitor. To be precise, I’m exactly 24 inches away.

At 39 inches away I can still read the smallest Sublime Text status bar text without straining but 1 inch beyond that and things get difficult. This is mainly due to the contrast of this theme not being the best, but for every day computer use, you can’t expect everything to be the best case scenario.

I mentioned earlier that my Chromebook is 1080p at 13.3” and I can comfortably code on it with Sublime Text at a typical laptop viewing distance which is about 12 inches away. Viewing it from 24” is far too much eye strain for me.

Using this logic, I can deduce that a 27” 4k monitor at 163 PPI would likely strain my eyes a bit because the Chromebook’s PPI is 165 PPI. Yeah sure, I can technically read the text, but it takes way too much effort.

I think for me personally, I would be able to handle a 36” 4k monitor which is 122 PPI but a 36” monitor is MASSIVE compared to 25” which means I would have to stand at least 39” inches away.

In my opinion if you plan to go dual monitors, you’re better off having both horizontal (landscape) or both vertical (portrait) if your desk can fit it.

At 150% scaling you end up with the same space as a 1440p monitor, in which case you might as well buy a 1440p monitor because it’s going to be a lot cheaper and come with much better specs for your money.

Let’s pretend we live in a world where you can view 4k at 100% scaling on a 27” monitor from 3 feet away. I’m sure it’s humanly possible for some, but not for most. I would consider this the best case scenario in terms of physical size and resolution, with an end goal of making you as productive as possible on paper.

A 1440p monitor will give you 3x code windows side by side and 76 lines of code. This is a pretty big deal. You might not realize it until you’ve tried it for a while but being able to comfortably have 3 editor files open and being able to view about 50% more vertical lines of code at a glance is huge.

A 4k monitor will technically be like having a 2x2 grid of 1080p monitors. So in theory you’d be able to have 8 code windows open with 51 lines of code each.

However, I’m not convinced it’s going to be as big of a change as going from 2 windows to 3 and 50 LOCs to 75 LOCs. Why? Probably due to how coding is in real life. How much vertical space do you really need, and is 4 going to be that much better than 3?

What about ultra wide monitors? They come in various resolutions, sometimes 3440x1440. I prefer dual monitors over a single ultra wide monitor (curved or not).

In my opinion the only pro to an ultra wide monitor is there’s no bezel, and as an aside they can be very nice for immersing yourself in certain games.

But there’s multiple downsides to ultra wide monitors. It suffers the same fate as a single 4k monitor for window management unless you have a tiled window manager.

That’s going to make it hard for others to read, and also make it impossible for you not to share certain things. If you wanted to temporarily edit a file with sensitive API keys with dual monitors you could just move your code editor to the 2nd monitor (not being shared) for 10 seconds while you make the edit, then bring it back when you’re done.

But with the ultra wide monitor you would have to drop the call and come back. This is disruptive when doing pair programming sessions. I know because I’ve had calls with multiple folks who have ultra wide monitors.

As for curved monitors, they do help reduce head movement since it wraps around your field of view but that also means the pixels where the monitor curves will be distorted. This depends on how steep the curve is, but if you’re a professional image designer this is now another variable you need to think about.

With dual monitors you could also always angle them inwards to get a similar effect of a curve, except now you’re in full control over how much it curves and there’s no pixel distortion. You just need to deal with visually seeing the bezel.

It’s very common to slightly angle in your dual monitors if you like to be in the middle of both. The other dual monitor set up is to keep one straight across in front of you and use that as a primary monitor while your 2nd monitor is off to the side and angled in towards you. I prefer the 2nd option, but either one works.

Having 2x 1440p monitors offers more horizontal space than a single 4k monitor or most ultra wide monitors. Seriously, for editing video you can’t get enough horizontal space.

Vertical space helps too in this case and a 4k or 3440x1440 monitor would be better for that, but I wouldn’t want to make the other trade offs for this alone.

LCD manufacturers are notorious for borderline lying to their customers. Before that rant comes out, let’s first go over what determines quality and color accuracy.

TN panels tend to have the best response times and refresh rates. You’ll find most high end gaming monitors with 144hz have TN panels. They give a smoother feel to everything at that refresh rate, and you’ll notice less motion blur in fast action games.

IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels are often considered the best type of panels for accuracy. Their viewing angles are fantastic without any loss of image quality. They also have the highest color accuracy of the bunch. As a software developer who does design, you’ll likely want an IPS panel. All 3 monitors listed in this post have IPS panels.

The downside is they typically come at 60hz and have worse response times than TN panels. However for real life software development and movie watching this won’t be a big deal. Even gaming will be more than fine unless you’re playing games at a highly competitive level.

It’s also worth noting that not all IPS panels are created equal. There’s an issue with some of them that people have labeled as “IPS glow” which means there’s a noticeable amount of brightness at various parts of the display. It makes a non-uniform glowing effect.

All 3 monitors listed in this post have very even lighting, at least the ones I’ve used personally. There’s always a potential for a defect, fortunately Amazon’s return policy is very generous if you happen to get a defective unit but that should be very rare.

Now, back to the rant about LCD manufacturers. Not only have they been caught doing price colluding but they go as far as releasing early versions of their monitors to review sites with IPS panels, but then go ahead and sell cheaper TN panels to the general public with the same exact model number.

If you want to research this on your own, go check out this useful explanation of what Chroma 4:4:4 means on Youtube. It’s a bit too much in depth for this article, but still important.

The refresh rate controls how many frames per second your screen can render. It’s measured in hertz, and standard values you’ll see out in the wild are 60hz, 120hz and 144hz. Anything less than 60hz for day to day computer use is unacceptable.

TV and movies can get by with less due to frame blending tricks in films but that tactic doesn’t work for when you’re looking at a monitor that’s rendering an application running on some operating system.

For software development and occasional gaming 60hz is fine. You will notice a nice buttery smoothness at 120hz and 144hz but if you’re just moving 2D windows around all day it’s not really worth the trade off of losing an IPS panel, since most 144hz monitors are TN panels aimed towards competitive gamers.

There’s 2 things to think about when it comes to refresh rates:You can’t always trust LCD manufactures with refresh rate too because they will list 120hz on a 4k monitor when in fact the monitor itself runs at 30hz or 60hz at 4k resolutions but 120hz if you down scale it to 1080p. LCD manufacturers love tricking the uninformed.

So this is where things get interesting. Input lag is much different than what most LCD manufacturers list on their spec sheets. They often list things like refresh rate and response times like 4ms or 2ms GTG (grey to grey), but both things are different than input lag.

Input lag is the amount of time it takes for the monitor to render your input which can then be perceived by your eyeballs. Meaning, if you move your mouse, it will take X number of milliseconds for you to see the cursor move.

I’m really sensitive to input lag for some reason. I highly recommend getting a monitor with around 20ms or less input lag or you may notice it to the point where it distracts you.

The Dell UltraSharp U2515H I’m using has about 13ms of input lag which is very low. For comparison, a lot of monitors have over 50ms of input lag which I think anyone would notice.

The ViewSonic VG2455-2K doesn’t have any recorded input lag figures on various review sites that I could find but very similar models have about 15ms. I don’t notice any delay whatsoever compared to either Dell monitors listed above.

For example my 2nd 1080p monitor has a crappy plastic stand and I would love to orient it vertically but I can’t unless I bought a custom arm stand and mounted it to my wall.

Dell is famous for having great stands, but other manufacturers have nice stands as well. Of course, don’t let a bad stand stop you from getting an excellent monitor because in the end, you can always use a custom stand if you must.

All 3 monitors listed in this post have great stands. You can pitch the monitor back a few degrees, angle it to the left or right, adjust the height and also adjust the orientation from horizontal to vertical.

So, now you have narrowed down your selection of monitors down to perhaps 2 or 3. The next step is to head over to a place like Amazon and start analyzing user reviews.

You can’t just blindly look at the star rating because sometimes dates are very important. For example, imagine the scenario where a manufacturer tweaks something in one of their models. If they released a batch early on in the year and it has a defect (say poor back light bleeding), you may end up finding a cluster of reviews that mention that, but they might all be around a certain time frame.

A general process for evaluating reviews would be to ensure that a majority of the reviews are 5 stars. Then carefully look at the 1-2 star reviews and see if you can identify a timing pattern. This method works well. Imagine if you just bought a brand new monitor and it had a defect. You would for sure review it shortly after receiving it.

Lastly, don’t be afraid of a small minority of negative reviews. All products are going to have people like this. Don’t let a few negative Nancy’s talk you out of a great monitor. You’ve done your research, they haven’t.

I think realistically, having 1x or 2x 1440p monitors is going to offer you a really good development experience. You’ll have plenty of room to get work done and you won’t have to squint to read text since by having read this article, you know how to measure what PPI will be good for you.

I’m ridiculously happy with the new monitor and I think the Dell UltraSharp U2515H is one of the best monitors around for programming and general usage going by its specs and price.

And thankfully in 2020 we have the Dell U2518D as a worthy successor and alternative – although it’s been out for a couple of years, but that’s good because it has had time to build up a positive track record.

In 2021 and beyond there’s still the above monitors if you can find them at a reasonable price. There’s also the ViewSonic VG2455-2K which is a worthy candidate too.

In this guide, we’ll recommend some of the best monitors for programming. Because one monitor won’t suit everyone, we’ve chosen several winners. Here’s a quick summary:

Game developers may prefer the Samsung C49RG9. While it has fewer pixels, they’re more responsive, especially where user input is concerned. It’s wide—basically two 1440p monitors side by side—so it’s a terrific alternative to a two-monitor setup. The downside? It’s almost triple the cost of our overall winner.

Our UltraWide picks, the LG 34UC98 and 34WK650, are a little more affordable. They’re both huge 34-inch monitors. The latter includes more pixels at a higher price.

Finally, our budget pick is the Acer SB220Q. It’s the cheapest, smallest, and lightest monitor in our roundup, so it’s a great choice if you’re short of room on your desk.

Are there any differences between the needs of a writer and a programmer when choosing a monitor? Yes, there are a few, especially for game developers. I cover them in detail in the next section.

This 27-inch monitor is big enough for most developers. While it doesn’t have the huge 5K resolution of the LG 27MD5KB below, it can still be considered a Retina display and has a much more palatable price. Text is sharp and readable, and the lack of flicker allows you to work without eye strain.

It’s not the largest or sharpest monitor in our roundup, but it’s our favorite. If you’re willing to pay a premium, you can read about higher-end options below. It’s also not the ideal monitor for game developers due to its refresh rate. But for everyone else, LG’s 27UK650 offers the best balance between price and features.

It’s just that the pixels are arranged differently, in a curved Super UltraWide configuration equivalent to having two 1440p monitors next to one another. It also costs as much as two 1440p displays!

The C49RG9 has a huge 49-inch display with an impressive number of pixels, though it’s not a Retina display. Despite the number of pixels, its high refresh rate and short input lag make it suitable for game developers.

LG offers several alternatives. A more affordable option is the lower-resolution LG 34WK650. It’s the same physical size, but has a screen resolution of 2560 x 1080, resulting in a pixel density of 81 PPI that may look a little pixelated.

If the budget isn’t your absolute priority, and you’re willing to spend a little more for a larger monitor, take a look at Acer’s R240HY. While it has a larger diagonal length of 23.8 inches, the resolution remains the same. Its lower pixel density of 92 PPI is still acceptable, but if you sit a little close to your monitor, it may appear a little pixelated.

The Dell U2518D is one of our finalists and will suit many developers. At 25 inches, it’s reasonably large and has good resolution and pixel density. It also has very low input lag, so it is an option for game developers looking for a more affordable monitor.

Another finalist, theViewSonic VG2765, offers a clear, bright 27-inch screen. However, I believe that the LG 27UK650, our overall winner, offers better value for your money by cramming significantly more pixels in the same space.

The Dell UltraSharp UP3218K is the most expensive monitor we list by far—and it’s overkill for almost any developer. It offers an incredibly high 8K resolution in a 31.5-inch display, resulting in the highest pixel density of our roundup. It’s also one of the brightest monitors on our list and offers very good contrast. As impressive as all that sounds, those specs are wasted on most programmers.

The Dell U3818DW gives our UltraWide winner a run for its money. The Dell offers a larger screen and more pixels (it’s more a competitor to the LG 38WK95C, also mentioned above), but has the slowest input lag of our roundup.

The Acer Predator Z35P is an excellent UltraWide monitor with a lot of similarities to our winner. The biggest difference is the price—this one is far more expensive, and the LG offers significantly better value for money. Other than that, the Acer has better contrast while the LG is significantly lighter.

The Dell U4919DW is one of our finalists, and only one of three Super UltraWide monitors to find a place in our roundup—the others being our winners for game development, the Samsung C49RG9, and C49HG90. The Samsungs have a better refresh rate, brightness, and contrast. Most other specs are similar.

Another affordable monitor with a pixel density of 92 PPI, the HP VH240a meets most of the needs of a developer. How does it compare with our budget pick, the Acer SB220Q? The Acer is quite a bit cheaper, and because it has the same screen r