lcd module st 10300 free sample

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

Would you like to design labels right on your screen without installing software? Then what you need is HERMA LabelAssistant online (EAO). Choose from more than 100 different templates. Or design your labels from scratch, with your own images, logos and graphics. Integrate Excel spreadsheets for mail merge. Or use EAO to generate barcodes and serial numbers. This is the state of the art in label design.

This article was co-authored by wikiHow Staff. Our trained team of editors and researchers validate articles for accuracy and comprehensiveness. wikiHow"s Content Management Team carefully monitors the work from our editorial staff to ensure that each article is backed by trusted research and meets our high quality standards.

954 953 746 776 955 916 221 283 905 207 961 957 260 288 973 974 182 678 259 277 554 684 904 902 238 000 958 060 927 901 097 921 930 372 328 045 778 877 282 590 854 029 030 855 131 814 287 073 689 127 171 018 170 549 594 034 555 929 910 919 918 327 956 652 653 944 920 972 939 113 564 688 558 128 easy reader crystals diamonds originals waterbury

A facile and template-free solvothermal method was developed as a bottom-up approach to synthesize mesoporous/macroporous MOF nanosheets in a simple and scalable way. It was found that starting coordination complexes of different copper(ii)-ligand compounds mediated the controlled growth and morphology of MOF crystals. By controlling the size and shape of the MOF crystals, the possibility to adjust and tailor the structure and performances of the assemblies was demonstrated. This work provides a bottom-up approach to synthesize MOF films and nanosheets in a simple and scalable way, which may have potential in energy and biomedical applications.

Metal–organic-frameworks (MOFs) are a class of compounds composed of metal ions or clusters within a network of organic ligand linkages. Similar to other porous materials, MOFs have attracted interest for use in gaseous or liquid adsorption, sensor materials,

Efficient, high-yielding methods that can produce MOF nanosheets with stable mesoporous frameworks are rare.et al. developed a top-down delamination method to synthesize crystalline MOF nanosheets from bulk crystals.et al.et al.

In this study, a facile and template-free solvothermal method has been developed to synthesize mesoporous/macroporous MOF nanosheets. In our method, cupric salts (i.e., Ac−, Cl−, NO3−, SO42−) and terephthalic acid (TPA) were dissolved in organic solvents containing dimethylformamide (DMF) and methanol (MeOH). The entire synthesis was performed in a Teflon-lined solvothermal autoclave reactor. The growth rate and morphology of the MOFs were controlled using starting coordination complexes of different copper(ii)-ligands.

Cupric salts, terephthalic acid (TPA), dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol and ethanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The MOF matrices were synthesized via a modified solvothermal method.ii) chloride, 76 mg of copper(ii) nitrate, 74 mg of copper(ii) acetate, or 65 mg of copper(ii) sulfate) and 92 mg of terephthalic acid (TPA) were dissolved in organic solvents containing 10 mL dimethylformamide (DMF) and 10 mL methanol or a solvent system inside a Teflon lined autoclave reactor (Col-Int Tech, Columbia, SC, USA). The solution was sonicated for 5 minutes to dissolve all particles and incubated for 24 hours at room temperature. The MOF product was synthesized by heating the reactor at either 120 °C for 48 hours or 180 °C for 24 hours. The crystalline bluish solids were centrifuged (5000 × g for 10 minutes) and washed three times with pure ethanol. The product was dried and activated in a vacuum oven at 100 °C.

Scanning electron photomicrographs were captured using an S-4700 low-temperature field emission scanning electron microscope (LT-SEM) (Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) with a Quorum Cryo-Prep Chamber (Quorum Technologies, East Sussex, UK). All MOF samples were pretreated with a thin layer of Pt coating. All images were captured at 10 kV accelerating voltage, and 10 mm working distance with a 4 pi Analysis System (Hillsborough, NC, USA). For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ethanol solutions containing MOF samples were directly applied onto 400 mesh carbon-coated copper grids and allowed to absorb for 30 minutes, excess solution was wicked off and grids were air dried. Grids were imaged at 80 kV with a Hitachi HT-7700 TEM (Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA).

Nitrogen (N2) isotherms were measured on a Micromeritics TriStar II Plus (Micromeritics Instrument Co., Norcross, GA, USA) unit to full saturation, i.e., a relative pressure of approximately ∼1.0 at 77 K to enable BET surface area and TOPV analyses. In addition, a low pressure (P < 1 atm) ethylene isotherm was measured on a Micromeritics Accelerated Surface Area and Porosimetry System (ASAP, Norcross, GA, USA) unit at 25 °C. The samples were activated on a Smart VacPrep degas unit by degassing in stages with a series of ramp/soak steps under dynamic vacuum till the final temperature reached 150 °C with a vacuum level of < 10−4 torr. Measurements of N2 BET on standard materials suggest accuracy to within approximately 5% at surface area values of 10 m2 g−1 and approximately 10% at levels of ∼0.5 m2 g−1 when at least 50 m2 of material are available for testing within the sample cell. Reproducibility for any given sample is dependent on the ability to regenerate the sample to the same degree of activation without modifying the surface or the pore structure. The cumulative volume was calculated based on a BJH analysis which relates pore size to relative pressure. In this analysis, a Halsey correction was used to account for monolayer thickness coverage.

Fig. 1 shows the MOF morphologies resulting from starting coordination complexes of different copper(ii)-ligands, including Cu2+–Ac−, Cu2+–SO42−, Cu2+–Cl−, and Cu2+–NO3−. Fig. 2a highlights the TEM micrograph of the as-obtained MOF nanosheets mediated via the Cu2+–Cl− coordination complex. The free-standing nanosheets consisted of both individual films and macroporous agglomerated stacks. Fig. 2b shows an SEM micrograph of a cross-sectional view of the sponge-like MOF nanosheets in the agglomerated form. The thickness of an individual nanosheet was about 50 nm, and the width of the nanosheet was over 15 μm (Fig. 1a). Fig. 1e showed nanosheet structure at higher magnification power, and its selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern suggests that the nanosheet is polycrystalline. Similar structures were observed in the MOF synthesized via Cu2+–NO3− coordination complex (Fig. 1b), in which the MOFs had the form of porous and fragmented nanosheets. The high degree of crystallinity of both nanocubes and nanosheets produces clearly identifiable peaks in the X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns.

Fig. 3 compares the XRD powders diffraction pattern between the anisotropic MOF nanosheet prepared from Cu2+–Cl− coordination complexes and the MOF nanocubes formed via Cu2+–Ac− coordination complexes. The XRD analyses of the as-obtained MOFs with different morphologies revealed the same cupric-TPA-based MOF.3− > SO42 > Cl− > Ac−. It was found that lower solubility with the Ksp below 1 × 10−6 could restrain the growth of MOF crystals in sizes and in 2-dimension, and therefore, nanosheet were only obtained from Cl− and Ac−. In this study, the differences in crystal packing and gas storage capacity were investigated between two representative samples, which are MOF nanocubes (Cu2+–Ac−) and MOF nanosheets (Cu2+–Cl−).

The XRD powder diffraction pattern of MOF (a) nanocubes formed via Cu2+–Ac− coordination complex, (b) nanosheet formed via Cu2+–Cl− coordination complex, and (c) the identified single crystal diffraction pattern from ICDD database.

Ac− is a weaker ligand to Cu2+ and the organic ligand has better solubility in the organic solvent base of DMF and MeOH comparing to the Cl− ligand. The differences in ligand affinity and solubility could have led to a slower reaction rate and the anisotropy in the crystal growth kinetics.Fig. 3). The increase in peak intensity at 2θ = 16.380° was assigned to (h,k,l = 2,0,0) crystallographic plane, and the drop in peak intensity at 2θ = 12.165° was assigned to (h,k,l = 0,2,0) crystallographic plane. The significant change in (020 and 200) peak intensity (Fig. 3b) was a result of out-of-plane XRD (Fig. 4a). The nanosheet pattern was further fitted using Le Bail refinement fitting for preferred orientation (PO) tendency analysis (Fig. 5 and ​and6).6). The results suggest that the stronger Cu2+–Cl− coordination complex could either induce preferred covalent bond formation in the (100) plane along the b, c axes or inhibit the crystallization process along the a axis (Fig. 4b), in order to form the anisotropic MOF nanosheet. Nonetheless, the lattice parameters (Table 1), calculated from the Le Bail refinement of the XRD spectrums (Fig. 5 and ​and6),6), remained constant among MOF nanosheets, nanocubes and the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database.ii)-ligands determine the PO tendency toward crystallization of MOF in the solvothermal method without affecting unit cell structure.

The differences in crystal packing and MOF morphology also determine the porosity and functionality of the as-obtained MOF nanostructures. Fig. 7 shows the N2 isotherm, from which the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and total pore volume (TOPV). The sharp rise in the isotherms at low values of P/Po is indicative of a large population of micropores (<20 Å). A comparison of the micropore volume to the total pore volume evaluated from the loading at P/Po of ∼1.0 reveals that ∼63% of the pore volume, of both samples, comes from the micropores (Fig. 8). This is also consistent with the high BET surface area values evaluated for these materials, i.e., 708 and 544 m2 g−1 for the MOF nanosheets and nanocubes, respectively. The cupric-TPA nanocubes have a similar BET surface area compared to a previous report,Fig. 2b), especially inside the agglomerated nanosheets structures. The cumulative and percent incremental pore volume plots are provided in Fig. 8a and b, respectively. The data suggests that a broad pore size distribution exists in the mesoporous and macroporous regions. The MOF nanocubes also have a small population of pores centered at ∼40 Å and above 500 Å, whereas MOF nanosheets have an extensive amount of mesoporous and macroporous cavities above 400 Å.

Comparison of (a) cumulative and (b) incremental pore size distribution from desorption measured at 77 K between MOF nanosheet (square) and nanocube (triangle).

A facile and template-free solvothermal method has been developed for mesoporous and macroporous MOF nanosheets. It was found that starting coordination complexes of different copper(ii)-ligand mediated the controlled growth and morphology of MOF crystals. By controlling the size and shape of the MOF crystals, it shows the possibility to adjust and tailor the structure and performances of the assemblies. This work provides a bottom-up approach to synthesize MOF films and nanosheets in a simple and scalable way, which may have potential applications for energy and biomedical applications.

Streit H. C. Adlung M. Shekhah O. Stammer X. Arslan H. K. Zybaylo O. Ladnorg T. Gliemann H. Franzreb M. Woell C. Wickleder C. ChemPhysChem.2012;13:2699–2702. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201200262. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Ahmed A. Hodgson N. Barrow M. Clowes R. Robertson C. M. Steiner A. McKeown P. Bradshaw D. Myers P. Zhang H. J. Mater. Chem. A.2014;2:9085–9090. doi: 10.1039/C4TA00138A. [CrossRef]

Carson C. G. Hardcastle K. Schwartz J. Liu X. Hoffmann C. Gerhardt R. A. Tannenbaum R. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2009:2338–2343. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200801224. [CrossRef]

Carson C. G. Hardcastle K. Schwartz J. Liu X. Hoffmann C. Gerhardt R. A. Tannenbaum R. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2009:2338–2343. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200801224. [CrossRef]

“Surplus Premises” means University Premises that are not in-use or reserved for use for teaching, service, research, and administrative services, or excluded under Section C. University Premises are available to students, registered student groups, employees, officially-recognized employee groups, and academic or administrative departments of the University, without charge and on a space-available, first-come-first-served basis for events and activities that advance the University’s mission. Such use shall also constitute “official use.” (Example: hosting student group meetings, speeches by officially invited guests of a department, and official student activities, and so forth.) A student organization activity or event that is approved by the Office of Student Involvement and Leadership (or other departments within the Office of Student Affairs) constitutes “official use” under this Section. The Campus Recreation Department is responsible for scheduling all University premises, and official use of University premises requires a space reservation.

When not in-use or reserved for use for official purposes, all publicly-accessible outdoor areas of the University (excluding athletic facilities) are publicly available, without charge and during daylight hours, on a space-available and first-come-first-served basis, for noncommercial speech and expressive conduct. Speech and expressive activity that occurs within one hundred feet of a residential housing unit, classroom, or office, shall occur at no more than a conversational volume.

University Premises that are in constant (though not necessarily uninterrupted) use (e.g. offices), rented by or rented-out by the University (e.g. the Nutter Center), not publicly accessible (e.g. mechanical areas, rooftops), or that by their nature not safe or appropriate for public use (e.g. laboratories, equipment storage rooms) will not be made available except for official purposes.

University Premises may not be reserved or used for fundraising activities (excluding University-approved fundraisers conducted by student organizations); gambling; food service; or storage.

In addition to a space reservation, a permit is required if a user wishes to reserve particular space, or reserve space for their exclusive use. Additionally, a permit is required if (a.) the sponsor anticipates or should anticipate an audience of more than fifty people, (b.) sound amplification will be used, (c.) the sponsor wishes to cordon-off or fence-in the space, (d.) the event involves set-up or tear-down, including seating, platforms/stages, lighting, A/V equipment, or electronic/mechanical equipment, or (e.) the event involves a large display (more than 100 lbs). There is no charge for a permit. Permit applications must be submitted to the Campus Recreation Department. Applications filed at least thirty days in advance of an event will be processed at least one week before the event. Applications filed less than thirty days in advance of an event will be processed expeditiously and in good faith, but processing is not guaranteed before the start of the event. Permits will be processed and issued/refused without regard to the viewpoint of the applicant.

Security Fee. The University does not charge a security fee to students or student groups based exclusively on the content of their expression or that of their invited guest, or upon the anticipated reaction to the student’s / guest’s expression.

Duration. Events must begin and end during the operating hours of the facility in which they occur (or during daylight hours, for publicly-accessible outdoor areas). Camping and overnight occupancy are prohibited except for events organized by the Office of Student Involvement and Leadership.

Reservations and requests for particular space will be honored when reasonable and space is available. The University may re-assign space when the preferred space is not available (or becomes unavailable) or if the University determines the requested space is inappropriate for the actual or expected audience (e.g. the requester anticipates an audience of 1,000, when there is no legitimate basis to anticipate that size crowd).

Food. Food must be prepared and served by the University’s designated food service vendor, except for food served at pot-luck style meals, and commercially-prepared and individually packaged refreshments (which cannot be sold).