ips lcd vs pls tft lcd in stock

If you want to buy a new monitor, you might wonder what kind of display technologies I should choose. In today’s market, there are two main types of computer monitors: TFT LCD monitors & IPS monitors.

The word TFT means Thin Film Transistor. It is the technology that is used in LCD displays.  We have additional resources if you would like to learn more about what is a TFT Display. This type of LCDs is also categorically referred to as an active-matrix LCD.

These LCDs can hold back some pixels while using other pixels so the LCD screen will be using a very minimum amount of energy to function (to modify the liquid crystal molecules between two electrodes). TFT LCDs have capacitors and transistors. These two elements play a key part in ensuring that the TFT display monitor functions by using a very small amount of energy while still generating vibrant, consistent images.

Industry nomenclature: TFT LCD panels or TFT screens can also be referred to as TN (Twisted Nematic) Type TFT displays or TN panels, or TN screen technology.

IPS (in-plane-switching) technology is like an improvement on the traditional TFT LCD display module in the sense that it has the same basic structure, but has more enhanced features and more widespread usability.

These LCD screens offer vibrant color, high contrast, and clear images at wide viewing angles. At a premium price. This technology is often used in high definition screens such as in gaming or entertainment.

Both TFT display and IPS display are active-matrix displays, neither can’t emit light on their own like OLED displays and have to be used with a back-light of white bright light to generate the picture. Newer panels utilize LED backlight (light-emitting diodes) to generate their light hence utilizing less power and requiring less depth by design. Neither TFT display nor IPS display can produce color, there is a layer of RGB (red, green, blue) color filter in each LCD pixels to produce the color consumers see. If you use a magnifier to inspect your monitor, you will see RGB color in each pixel. With an on/off switch and different level of brightness RGB, we can get many colors.

Winner. IPS TFT screens have around 0.3 milliseconds response time while TN TFT screens responds around 10 milliseconds which makes the latter unsuitable for gaming

Winner. the images that IPS displays create are much more pristine and original than that of the TFT screen. IPS displays do this by making the pixels function in a parallel way. Because of such placing, the pixels can reflect light in a better way, and because of that, you get a better image within the display.

As the display screen made with IPS technology is mostly wide-set, it ensures that the aspect ratio of the screen would be wider. This ensures better visibility and a more realistic viewing experience with a stable effect.

Winner. While the TFT LCD has around 15% more power consumption vs IPS LCD, IPS has a lower transmittance which forces IPS displays to consume more power via backlights. TFT LCD helps battery life.

Normally, high-end products, such as Apple Mac computer monitors and Samsung mobile phones, generally use IPS panels. Some high-end TV and mobile phones even use AMOLED (Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diodes) displays. This cutting edge technology provides even better color reproduction, clear image quality, better color gamut, less power consumption when compared to LCD technology.

This kind of touch technology was first introduced by Steve Jobs in the first-generation iPhone. Of course, a TFT LCD display can always meet the basic needs at the most efficient price. An IPS display can make your monitor standing out.

When it comes to choosing the right panel type of your LCD monitor, the options are seemingly endless. We’ve discussed the differences between AMOLED and LCD displays as well as the different types of touchscreen monitors that are commonly used for various devices and their benefits. Now it’s time to learn about the different features and specifications of PLS and IPS panels so you can decide which one is the most suitable choice for your specific personal or professional applications.

PLS stands for plane to line switching. Also referred to as Super PLS Panel, this technology boasts superior technological advancements such as a multitude of brightness setting options, crystal-clear image quality, and adjustable viewing angles without breaking the bank.

IPS stands for in-plane switching. It’s one of the most commonly used monitors for LCD displays and it consists of two glass panels that hold a layer of liquid crystals in between them. The liquid crystals become animated and perform predetermined actions such as moving in a specific direction or displaying certain colours when they’re charged with an electric current. These actions result in the high-quality images that appear on your television, laptop, or smartphone screen.

Both LCD monitor panel types have their advantages and disadvantages for various types of applications. Finding out how they work will help you determine which one is the best choice for your needs.

As mentioned, IPS LCD monitors contain hundreds of liquid crystals that are situated between two glass sheets in a parallel formation. As electric currents run through the liquid crystals when the screen is turned on, they become animated and move in different directions and backlighting passes through them. This is what produces the crystal-clear and instantaneous images you see on the screen. The excellent viewing angles are the result of the horizontal movements of the liquid crystals inside the panel.

PLS panels for LCD monitors have been on the market for over a decade and have proven to be a worthy adversary for their IPS predecessors. Although the technology is the same for the most part, IPS does offer some minor improvements. The main difference is that IPS panels offer more optimized liquid molecular alignment, which makes for a slightly better viewing experience. Hence, PLS screens offer 15% more brightness than IPS panel types.

From an aesthetic and logistical standpoint, PLS panel types are also thinner than IPS due to the fact that the glass sheets that hold the liquid crystals in place are positioned much lower in the screen configuration.

When it comes to comparing and contrasting the differences between IPS and PLS LCD monitor panel types, the competition is pretty stiff. Both monitors are fairly similar with the exception that PLS is meant to be an improvement on the previous technology. Here are the key factors that should be considered when deciding which one is the best monitor panel for LCD industrial displays.

PLS monitors offer superior viewing angles when compared to IPS displays. Unlike IPS displays, PLS monitors don’t have any noticeable colour distortions and they have significantly lower production costs.

Colour contrast and brightness is a central concern when purchasing a new commercial or industrial display. Whether you’re a gamer or graphic designer, your best option in this regard is to stick to IPS displays. They offer far more consistent image quality, colour contrast, and brightness that’s perfect for applications that rely heavily on high-quality image production.

Unfortunately, PLS and IPS monitors both have a fairly slow response time (the amount of time it takes for liquid crystals to shift from one colour or shade to another). For this reason, neither one is the ideal choice for gaming purposes, but they’re both suitable for graphic design projects that focus more on colour distribution and accuracy than response time.

PLS panel types have been proven to have superior colour distribution and accuracy compared to IPS panel types. PLS displays have a far more expansive colour gamut that’s ideal for users who require the most natural-looking images and colour options.

Backlight bleed occurs when the lights from the back of the screen leak through the edges, which results in uneven lighting or glow. This is a fairly common shortcoming of IPS screens when the brightness is adjusted to a particularly high level and can make for a poor viewing experience. PLS panel types don’t have this problem and offer even lighting regardless of the brightness settings.

The answer is inconclusive. Both IPS and PLS monitor types certainly have their advantages. Although PLS is slightly better in terms of backlighting and faster response times, the margins for improvement are fairly tight. It really just depends on what your preferences are as well as the applications that the monitors are being used for.

Nauticomp Inc.is one of the leading manufacturers and distributors of sophisticated state-of-the-art LCD displays and monitors in North America. Contact us to learn about our various products or to place an order.

PLS (Plane to Line Switching) panel in an IPS-type panel made by Samsung; All IPS-type panels, such as Innolux’s AAS, AUO’s AHVA and LG’s AH-IPS and Nano IPS offer excellent color accuracy and wide viewing angles.

PLS stands for Plane to Line Switching and is produced by Samsung, who claims that a PLS panel offers 10% more brightness, better viewing angles, lower production costs (about 15%), better image quality and the possibility of having flexible panels.

There are several variations of IPS panels, such as AU Optronics‘ AHVA (Advanced Hyper-Viewing Angle) panels. New AHVA panels are usually faster than other IPS panels but don’t have as wide color gamut. However, they can be paired with custom backlights and deliver an exceptional color gamut, such as the Acer XB323UGP with full Adobe RGB color space coverage.

In reality, most people don’t differentiate between IPS, AHVA and PLS since they are pretty much alike, which is why they are categorized under a single entity and simply called ‘IPS.’

Overall, whether a monitor has an IPS, PLS, or AHVA panel shouldn’t be the deciding factor when searching for a new display. You should check each monitor’s color gamut, brightness, response time and other specs to determine which monitor’s panel is better.

IPS (In-Plane Switching) lcd is still a type of TFT LCD, IPS TFT is also called SFT LCD (supper fine tft ),different to regular tft in TN (Twisted Nematic) mode, theIPS LCD liquid crystal elements inside the tft lcd cell, they are arrayed in plane inside the lcd cell when power off, so the light can not transmit it via theIPS lcdwhen power off, When power on, the liquid crystal elements inside the IPS tft would switch in a small angle, then the light would go through the IPS lcd display, then the display on since light go through the IPS display, the switching angle is related to the input power, the switch angle is related to the input power value of IPS LCD, the more switch angle, the more light would transmit the IPS LCD, we call it negative display mode.

The regular tft lcd, it is a-si TN (Twisted Nematic) tft lcd, its liquid crystal elements are arrayed in vertical type, the light could transmit the regularTFT LCDwhen power off. When power on, the liquid crystal twist in some angle, then it block the light transmit the tft lcd, then make the display elements display on by this way, the liquid crystal twist angle is also related to the input power, the more twist angle, the more light would be blocked by the tft lcd, it is tft lcd working mode.

A TFT lcd display is vivid and colorful than a common monochrome lcd display. TFT refreshes more quickly response than a monochrome LCD display and shows motion more smoothly. TFT displays use more electricity in driving than monochrome LCD screens, so they not only cost more in the first place, but they are also more expensive to drive tft lcd screen.The two most common types of TFT LCDs are IPS and TN displays.

Nostalgia or riddance aside, there are still some valid reasons to use a CRT monitor. When compared to LCD panels, CRT monitors can have higher contrast ratio, very low response time (which leads to non-blurred pictures even with fast movement on screen), and very little input lag, although LCD input lag can be largely negated. The downsides of CRTs are apparent, though: they’re large, heavy, consume more power, produce flicker, can produce audible, high frequency noise (although age plays into whether one can hear them or not), produce slightly distorted images, and produce harmful electromagnetic waves (in the form of x-rays), which requires that toxic materials such as lead and barium must be used as shielding to prevent detrimental health effects. CRT monitors are also notoriously hazardous to repair, given their large, active electrical coils that can measure upwards of 50,000 volts of electricity.

To be clear, many of these issues have been improved upon, but due to the underlying science of LCD TN panels, cannot be completely resolved. In fact, many of these issues -- like uneven backlighting, motion blur, input lag, and dead/stuck pixels -- are inherent issues across all LCD panel types. Poor viewing angles become a more pressing issue with larger displays, since the viewing angle when viewed straight on increases towards the outside of the monitor, thus causing more color distortion. TN panels do have the advantages of lower response times and higher refresh rates than other panel types/CRTs. TN panels are generally from 60Hz to 144Hz, offering substantially greater fluidity of gameplay with higher frequencies.

TN panels provide a good compromise between CRTs and other LCD panels as their traditionally low response rates, input lag, and high refresh rate make them comparable to CRTs for accuracy; TN panels also have the advantages of offering sharper pictures, widescreen output, lower weight, smaller physical dimensions, and higher resolutions compared to CRTs.

Still, compared to other LCD panels, TN panels suffer from poor viewing angles and worse color reproduction. Ultimately, for most gamers playing somewhat competitively to very competitively, TN panels are a good choice, but for those looking for a prettier and improved color experience, another panel type may be worth considering.

IPS (In-Plane Switching) was created to address the shortcomings of TN panels. IPS panels seek to solve TN panels’ issues of poor color reproduction and viewing angles. In this regard, IPS panels have largely succeed. Not only do they offer a higher contrast ratio (superior blacks), high color accuracy (which leads to IPS panels also generally looking less “washed out”), but IPS panels also have very little color shift when changing the viewing angles.

The tradeoff to this is that IPS panels have slower response times, higher production costs, higher power consumption, and lower possible refresh rates. IPS panels have traditionally been 60Hz, although, as with all monitors, they can be overclocked (results will vary). There have been improvements to IPS panels over the years, and slightly different revisions in the form of E-IPS and H-IPS, but ultimately the differences between these versions are inconsequential to gamers and those not involved in graphic design as a job.

Due to their worse response rates and lower possible refresh rates, IPS panels are generally considered to be worse for competitive gameplay and used more often when color is important, such as graphic design. For gamers who don’t play competitively and prefer breathtaking strolls in Skyrim instead of sweeping scrubs in CS:GO, an IPS panel should be a consideration for the next monitor.

PLS (Plane to Line Switching) are quite similar to IPS panels, so much so that they have the same advantages and disadvantages, with a couple extra minor advantages. PLS is produced by Samsung, who claims that compared to IPS panels, PLS panels have better viewing angles, a 10% increase in brightness, 15% decrease in production costs, increased image quality, and allow for flexible panels. Samsung’s PLS panels have been known to overclock well in monitors such as the QNIX 2710 in particular. Overall, PLS is basically Samsung’s version of IPS, as it is very similar in functionality (and even name). AHVA is also very similar to IPS and PLS, and differentiation between them is rare, although it should not be confused with the next panel type.

VA (Vertical Alignment) panels offer a solid medium between TN and IPS panels. VA was created to combine the advantages of IPS and TN panels, and largely did, although they did so with some compromise. That seems to be a theme in the world of monitors.

Compared to IPS panels, VA panels have the advantage of higher possible refresh rates. Although most are currently 60Hz, there are a few that are above 60Hz. VA has more advantages over TN panels than IPS, with better color reproduction, higher maximum brightness, and better viewing angles. VA panels do have the best contrast ratios of all panel types mentioned, but they also have the worst response times of the monitor technologies covered here. This causes blurring in fast-moving pictures and is disadvantageous to gaming.

IPS panels solve the issues of TN panels, with better color reproduction and viewing angles, but do so at the cost of refresh rate and response time. IPS panels are especially useful for those not wanting to play too competitively, but want a beautiful/immersive visual experience. PLS and AHVA are similar enough to IPS to usually not be differentiated.

VA panels provide a good middle ground with better-than-IPS refresh rates and contrast levels, but have worse viewing angles and color production, although generally still better than TN. Response times are VA’s largest downfall, though, being slower than IPS and its variants and TN.

What’s best for you will depend on all of these items. For those wanting to play at a competitive level and who favor FPS or racing games, TN panels are best. Those wanting a more impressive and immersive experience may want an IPS (or similar variant, such as PLS), especially if working on artistic endeavors. Finally, those wanting a general monitor for work might consider a VA panel, although due to their higher response times, they won’t be good for gaming.

Some of the most popular gadget-related queries on the internet are based on TFT LCD vs IPS LCD and other related phrases. Some tech reviewers have also highlighted the difference between the two in their articles or videos. What exactly is the difference between the two?

For starters, the inquiry does not make sense from a technical perspective. It is important to stress the fact that it is impossible to compare a TFT LCD against an IPS LCD.

A thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal display is a specific variant of LCD technology that is based primarily on thin-film transistor or TFT technology. A TFT is a particular type of field-effect transistor or FET characterized by a thin transistor relative to the plane of the device. Note that a FET controls the flow of current in a semiconductor.

The defining characteristic of TFT LCDs is that they are also considered active matrix LCDs in which individual pixels are attached to individual transistors to allow individual switching and active addressing of the pixel state from an on or off state.

On the other hand, an IPS LCD or an in-plane switching liquid-crystal display is actually a type of a TFT LCD. It is a more specific LCD technology that involves placing a layer of liquid crystals between two glass surfaces and aligning the specific liquid crystal molecules parallel to these two surfaces in-plane or in predetermined directions.

An in-plane switching LCD fundamentally uses a thin-film transistor to allow the individual switching and active addressing of the individual pixels. It is interesting to note that the first IPS LCD introduced in 1996 was called Super TFT LCD.

Nevertheless, the better alternative to the TFT LCD vs IPS LCD inquiry and discussion is to compare each against better and more relevant display technologies.

The direct counterpart of a TFT LCD is passive matrix LCD technology. A passive matrix display controls and addresses segments of pixels rather than individual pixels. It is also referred to as direct-driven display technology.

It is also important to note that thin-film transistors are also used in other display technologies such as OLED displays or AMOLED displays. OLEDs are one of the primary display technologies used in mid-range to flagship-grade consumer electronic devices. They are based on organic light-emitting diodes while LCDs are based on liquid crystals.

OLEDs are also compared to IPS LCDs. In-plane switching LCDs are also used in several mid-range to flagship-grade devices. The Liquid Retina brand of displays used by Apple is based on in-plane switching LCD technology.

The closest rivals of IPS LCDs are other TFT LCD technologies such as twisted nematic or TN LCDs and vertical alignment LCDs. In-plane switching is the superior technology among the three. However, newer technologies have emerged. These include plane-to-line switching or PLS LCD and advanced hyper-viewing angle or AHVA.

P C M, 21 May 2021Here is a comparison between IPS and PLS. See yourself. There are plenty of displays in the ma... more That one from Sony is not the same quality as these PLS on Samsung cell phones. It jist cant be. I am not ignorant. Just have my own experience as a guy who works with phones and Samsung PLS TFT is not even close to the best IPS LCD out there. Response time and viewing angles are not that good on PLS even Samsung market them as superior to IPS. Thats why I said I dont buy that marketing ploy of Samsung like they are generally better than their IPS counterpart. You have obviously informed your self in theory, but theory is one thing and practicallity another.

IQ200, 20 May 2021Well thanks for the info but... On spec sheet says only TFT, which we all know is not somethin... moreHere is a comparison between IPS and PLS. See yourself. There are plenty of displays in the market which are going by the name of IPS but are actually PLS. You don"t know it unless the company says specifically or some expert reviewers review it.

IQ200, 20 May 2021Well thanks for the info but... On spec sheet says only TFT, which we all know is not somethin... moreSamsung is the one who makes the best LCD and OLED both in the world.

Secondly Samsung PLS has better viewing angle than IPS... moreWell thanks for the info but... On spec sheet says only TFT, which we all know is not something great. I dont buy that story from Samsung that their PLS is better than IPS. Its not even close to the best IPS out there in color and viewing angles. The only thing they have better over any IPS is that they are way cheaper to produce and they consume less power. There are some more pros and cons of each but those two are among the most important ones for average Joe.

IPS is an acronym for in-plane switching, which is a screen technology that is used with LCD screens. In-plane switching was designed to address limitations in the LCD screens of the late 1980s that used a twisted nematic field effect matrix. The TN method was the only technology available at the time for active matrix TFT (Thin Film Transistor) LCDs. The main limitations of the twisted nematic field effect matrix LCDs are low-quality color and a narrow viewing angle. IPS-LCDs deliver better color reproduction and wider viewing angles.

IPS-LCDs are commonly used on midrange and high-end smartphones and portable devices. All Retina Display Apple iPhones feature IPS-LCDs, as does the Motorola Droid and some TVs and tablets.

IPS-LCDs feature two transistors for each pixel, whereas TFT-LCDs use just one. This requires a more powerful backlight, which delivers more accurate colors and lets the screen be viewed from a wider angle.

IPS-LCDs don"t show when the screen has been touched, which you might notice in some older monitors. This is particularly advantageous for touch-screen displays like those on smartphones and touch-screen laptops.

The downside is that an IPS-LCD consumes more power than a TFT-LCD, possibly up to 15 percent more. They"re also more expensive to make and have longer response times.

Enhanced IPS (E-IPS) improved the viewing angle and reduced the response time to five milliseconds, while also widening the aperture for light transmission. It was released in 2009.

2010 saw Professional IPS (P-IPS), which offered more than a billion colors and more orientations per pixel. IPS-Pro is highly advanced and expensive.

LG Display released Advanced High-Performance IPS (AH-IPS) in 2011 to improve color accuracy, increase the resolution, and provide more light when in lower power mode.

Samsung introduced Super PLS (Plane-to-Line Switching) in 2010 as an alternative to IPS. It"s similar to IPS but with the added benefits of a better viewing angle, a brightness increase of 10 percent, a flexible panel, better image quality, and a 15 percent lower cost than IPS-LCDs.

In 2012, AHVA (Advanced Hyper-Viewing Angle) was introduced by AU Optronics to provide an IPS alternative that featured IPS-like panels but with higher refresh rates.

Advancements in technology have led to better, brighter display systems, redefining our experience of viewing content. Better picture quality and crystal-clear images are some of the benefits of new displays such as AMOLED and IPS LCD

When choosing which television or mobile phone to buy, it’s essential to consider the display quality and technology. Here are the differences between Super AMOLED and IPS LCD screens, two of the forerunners in display technology, and an analysis of which one of the two is better.

LCD, short for liquid crystal display, has a flat panel display. It is an electronically controlled optical device that uses the liquid crystals" light-modified properties along with polarisers. The liquid crystals do not directly emit light. Hence, a reflector and a backlight generate images either in monochrome or colour. An LCD blocks the light instead of emitting it and is used more widely in televisions and basic smartphones. IPS, which stands for in-plane switching, is a screen technology for LCD.

AMOLED has a thinner film transistor fixed to every LED alongside a capacitor. AMOLED and IPS LCD screens are made using three pixels—red, blue, and green. LCDs generate light through a backlight. With AMOLED displays, every pixel has a separate light source, eliminating the need for a backlight. As a result, the display assembly is thinner and provides consistent lighting throughout the complete screen.

Each of these displays has its specialities. Nevertheless, if we compare Super AMOLED display vs IPS LCD, the former is better because it integrates the latest technologies and has excellent performance.

China-based BOE is a leading manufacturer in the innovation and development of TFT LCD technology. The global share of BOE in the field of liquid crystal panels took first place in 2018. BOE’s primary focus is on improving color performance on ADS displays while increasing brightness and viewing angles.

Its proprietary imaging technology is called ADSDS, or simply ADS. When Samsung announced that it was phasing out LCD panel production in 2020, BOE ADS matrices became a reality in Samsung TVs. In this article, we will find out what an ADS panel is and answer the question: “Which type of ADS or IPS matrix is ​​better”?

IPS panels are designed to provide richer colors and greater depth than traditional TN panels. They use a configuration of liquid crystals located in a plane perpendicular to the luminous flux of the illumination (In Plane Switching). Overall image quality is improved with higher contrast, better color accuracy and increased brightness.

But the main thing is that compared to VA matrices, where liquid crystals are located along the backlight luminous flux, IPS panels have significantly improved viewing angles. This is a huge boon for lovers of joint entertainment at the TV screen. The IPS technology was further developed in PLS matrices .

This is the property of Samsung. PLS (Plane to Line Switching) offers even wider viewing angles as well as superior image quality and brightness through a denser arrangement of subpixels. It is also known that PLS matrices are more affordable. A significant disadvantage of IPS and PLS matrices is poor contrast relative to VA.

Continuing to develop and improve the ideology of IPS, many companies are striving to eliminate the main disadvantages of such panels – low contrast and price. BOE is clearly the most successful company with its ADvanced Super Dimension Switch technology. The ADS sensor type features ultra-wide viewing angles, excellent color reproduction and ultra-fast motion image processing.

Initially, the ADS TV matrix was intended to be used mainly in commercial projects. These are seamless video walls, digital signage, interactive whiteboards, transparent boards, and other specialized displays. Such a variety of areas of application is due not least to the high strength of the panels with the IPS-ADS matrix type. ADS screens are very pressure-resistant, which is not so important for TVs, but very important for interactive displays.

As a continuation of the development of IPS technology, the ADS matrix uses a highly transparent and highly conductive Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) material to form a control transistor layer. In specific figures, this gives an additional increase in brightness of the order of 15%. In addition, the rotation of liquid crystals in the subpixel is controlled by two electric fields – longitudinal and transverse.

How does ADS differ from IPS? IPS panels have become the industry standard for a long time, as the color reproduction and viewing angles of these matrices have not yet been surpassed. But the ADS matrix, in comparison with IPS, has increased brightness due to the use of a more light-transmitting layer as the basis for placing the control elements.

This alone gives her a huge plus. Placing the control layer above the LCD layer provides the ADS matrix with additional rigidity, expanding the possible areas of its use. The reduced response time opens up good prospects for use as TV screens and gaming monitors.

It remains to get around the main drawback – the relative high cost of ADS. But since Samsung has already started using ADS panels in its TVs (Q80A 2021), it means that things are moving in the right direction.

Although the IPS panels are not so bad themselves, the PLS panels have better viewing angles. Coupled with its higher contrast and brightness, you get a much better viewing experience.

The reason why IPS displays tend to have better clarity of color than TFT displays is a better crystal oriental arrangement which is an important part. That is why when you compare the IPS LCD with TFT LCD for the clarity of color, IPS LCD will get the nod because of the better and advanced technology and structure.

IPS and PLS panels are the best option for console gaming due to their excellent viewing angles and overall performance. VA panels are the best option for entertainment system, and for instances where deep contrast and color quality is critical.

Super PLS (Plane to Line Switching) is a proprietary LCD panel type developed by Samsung that is very similar in design and construction to IPS panel technology. Samsung has made claims stating Super PLS panels have wider viewing angles and produce 10% more brightness than IPS displays while being cheaper to produce.

The difference between them is the material as AMOLED uses organic materials, mainly carbon, while TFT does not. This consequently means that AMOLED displays are much thinner than LCD displays; due to the absence of a backlight. It also results in much better colors than a TFT is capable of producing.

IPS: When it comes to the viewing angle, IPS panels far outweigh the VA panels. They have wider viewing angles. You will experience no drop in picture quality even if you sit and watch the TV from an extreme angle.

IPS is thus the most sociable LCD technology. In summation, IPS gaming monitors aren’t just viable, they’re now advisable. The technology has outgrown past limitations and currently offers its advantages of great colors and viewing angles with no strings attached, unless you count the HDMI or DisplayPort cable.

Difference Between TN and IPS. TN stands for Twisted Nematic while IPS stands for In-Plane Switching. These technologies handle the way the liquid crystals move differently, resulting in different performance. Probably the biggest difference between the two, in the buyer’s perspective, is the price.

IPS is an acronym for in-plane switching, which is a screen technology that is used with LCD screens . In-plane switching was designed to address limitations in the LCD screens of the late 1980s that used a twisted nematic field effect matrix.