kdl40v5100 lcd panel free sample
If you’re looking for a bright and energy-efficient new LCD HDTV, we have a winner here. This Sony may not have quite squeaked out the win in our recent five-set Face Off (September 2009 Home Theater), but it was the top-rated LCD and impressed us all with its surprisingly good contrast ratio, deep black levels, and all-around solid performance.—TJN
jector into it, and you have 750 joules of surge energy absorption between a lightning strike or other power spike and your expensive projector. (It’s good behind flat panels too.)—MFr
Editor"s Note: It"s with great pleasure thatHome Theaterbrings you this exclusive first review of Sharp"s new ground-breaking LC-90LE745U HDTV. With this 90-inch set, the first at its size truly intended for mass production, Sharp begins the era of projection-size flat panels suitable for any light environment. While the $10,000 (street) ticket price still exceeds the cost of a high quality 2D/3D projector and screen, as a sign of what"s to come, it is a significant introduction. And, as you"ll read in Tom Norton"s detailed review, not a bad TV. - Rob Sabin
Ninety inches diagonal is not all that big as projection screens go. But Sharp’s new LC-90LE745U, at that same 90 inches, is immense by flat panel standards. With more than twice the screen area of a 65inch set, it has little flat panel competition for its size, and none at all for its combination of size and cost. Panasonic has an 85inch plasma, for example, that will set you back nearly twice as much. LG showed a 4K 80-inch LCD set at last January’s CES, but exact pricing and availability is still undetermined. Mitsubishi offers a 92-inch rear-projection set at some remarkable street prices (around $3,000), but its massive 194 pounds and 25-inch depth (225 pounds and 32 inches in its shipping carton) might be just a little intimidating.
“PLEASE READ Cheek pictures carefully. 10% Off your next purchase if you buy. This item is in great condition. There is normal wear on the item. There is very minimal wear on this item. There are a couple of tiny dot sized scratches on the left of the screen approximately 7 and 2 on the right side of the screen. Other then that this item is in great condition. The dvds are also in good condition. This item have been texted and works. Any questions please ask. We post new items everyday. Thank you for shopping OZCO. (1) Sony Bravia KDL-40V5100 Flat Screen TV LCD V Series 2009 40", (2) GE 41567 UltraPro 8-Device Universal Full Backlit TV DVD Remote Control. (3) 5 DVDS. Customize your own lot buy 2, 4, 10 or 50 and we can also bundle shipping for a shipping discount.”
kindly look into the conversation between Sony and myself for the display panel problem..I was fighting for more than a week for the same, I could not get a favourable reply from SONY yet
The problem arose on 13th Jan 2014, when the TV suddenly lost its display. It showed a symptom of vertical contour patterns. But the audio remained intact. We applied for service request immediately on the same day (Service Request No: 17434214). The service engineer inspected the TV on 18th Jan 2014 and inferred that the display panel is to be completely replaced which would cost around 40% of the original price of the set. We assume that an LED TV display has a life-time of (ave) 60,000 to 1,00,000 hour. In our case, it had not even crossed 3700 h (ave). We could not understand such a variation in performance happening with Sony product.
Since the TV was well protected in every aspect from our side, we are sure that the problem was not due to any negligence in our support and operation. I came across reviews describing gross manufacturing defects in Sony LED and LCD TVs. We also found that you solved the disputes in favour of the consumer in most of the cases that were beyond the warranty period. We have always had good opinion and trust in Sony products because of the quality and brand. We hope to receive similar support from your side in our case too.
We are very much aware that the warranty period is 1 year from the date of purchase and our TV had finished 2 years and 14 days exactly. But, since there was no physical damage or operational negligence from our side, it is not just for Sony to make us carry the burden of replacing the display panel at our own cost.
We request you to replace this TV set with a new, operable one. Even if it is going to be of higher rate, we shall very well pay only the remaining amount and buy it. Else, kindly make sure that you replace the LED display panel free of cost.
“Natural Electronic defect may happen in the Electronic products, in the course of time.” This is absolutely atrocious and irresponsible reply. I have informed you that I have provided all the necessary security systems that are required for the proper functioning of the TV. Inspite of such accessories if the TV gets faulted, the above-said reason cannot be accepted. The product is having gross manufacturing defect, that was the only fault and I shall not accept anything less than a complete replacement of the display panel free of cost.
Also refer: h t t p : // ww w. c on sumercourt.in/television/34377-sony-bravia-lcd-problem-2. h t m l (complaint no.15040079). After reading the entire blog, do you still hold your point that every one had a Natural Electronic Defect? If you still hold ‘yes’, it surely infers that “Defective Sony Products” are marketed in India for bigger price due to brand name alone.
I am expressing my thoughts and request not to approve your estimate of repairing/replacing my LED display panel at my own cost, but to make sure that you rectify this issue by taking the full responsibility. I have also mentioned in my last mail that, “even if it is going to be of higher rate, we shall very well pay only the remaining amount and buy it. Else, kindly make sure that you replace the LED display panel free of cost.”
The Display Panel needs to be replaced for satisfactory working of the set. The service estimation for your product is Rs. 14,371/-. We would again like to request you to approve the estimate so that we can proceed for service.
A same kind of display panel problem for Bravia series was faced by another customer (complaint no.15040079) where the defective TV was 22 months old, we also found that you solved the disputes in favour of the consumer that were beyond the warranty period.
On 25th September 2013, SONY approved to replace the LCD panel FREE of cost for the TV purchased on 15-Oct-2011 for the Consumer Saikat Ganguly, pls refer (complaint no.15040079) [url]h tt p : // ww w.cons um ercourt.in/television/34377-sony-bravia-lcd-problem-2 . h tm l
I am expressing my thoughts and request not to approve your estimate of repairing/replacing my LED display panel at my own cost, but to make sure that you rectify this issue by taking the full responsibility.
I have also mentioned in my last mail that, “even if it is going to be of higher rate, we shall very well pay only the remaining amount and buy a new TV. Else, kindly make sure that you replace the LED display panel free of cost”.
There will be few months warranty for the new Panel even after getting it replaced. This is very bad. And apart from this if we go for replacements than what is the guarantee that the panel will not go bad again after few months warranty.
We received your service request for KDL-32EX420 for the symptom “No Picture”. Upon inspection by our engineer from Authorized Service Center, M/S City Electronics Pvt. Ltd, Tirunelveli, it was found that the display panel needs to be replaced for satisfactory working of the TV. The estimate for this service is Rs 14,371/-. This has also been communicated in the e-mails sent by Ms. P.Sushmitha.
As explained in our last communication, the display panel needs to be replaced for satisfactory working of the TV. The estimate for this service is Rs 14,371/-. This has also been communicated in the letter sent by the undersigned. We offered you 1 Year of service warranty on the replaced panel, from the date of service.
When I went through the numerous open forums, there were too much similar type of Display panel complaints especially in SONY BRAVIA series and they people sending similar type of automatic reply. This is a universal problem with BRAVIA series and SONY recalled these units all over the world except INDIA. Even though SONY know very well this as a GLOBAL issue, by hiding their manufacturing defect and useless quality, SONY management decently refused to accept consumers True feedback about the non reliable SONY faulty products and worst kind of services. This is so called veiled CHEATING.
Note: Thanks to SONY Consumer Mr. Saikat Ganguly for his detailed feedback and comment (He also affected in this similar kind of issue but SONY approved to replace the LCD panel FREE of cost for the TV purchased by him on 15-Oct-2011 (complaint no.15040079 ) h tt p :// w w w.c o n sumer court.in/television/34377-sony-bravia-lcd-problem-2 . h t m l
With all the advantages and disadvantages, lcdds are essentially a good choice for those who see the TV starting from 4k smartphone. Nowadays, in addition to the wholesale models, lcdds are essentially a good option for those that don ’ t have the capacity of a device.
OTOH, if you buy a 3D DVD, you"ll need to be sure it is compatible with whatever monitor you own. Most current DVDs sold are NOT designed for the anaglyph user. As m2m mentions, some options are time-sequential (shutter glasses), polarizing glasses, as well as a number of autostereoscopic (no-glasses) options, such as those produced by Sharp (parallax barrier) or other companies that use lenticular layers over an LCD screen (e.g., Philips, StereoGraphics, etc.).
If you"ve read this far - perhaps you"ll also be interested to know that lenticular uses the same concept as those 3-D postcards you may have seen and that have been popular for 50 years or so. The disadvantage of Lenticular and Parallax Barrier is that they sacrifice resolution - you get 3D but each eye sees a half (or worse) resolution image. OTOH, you don"t need glasses. Most systems that use polarizing glasses on LCD monitors also sacrifice resolution (e.g., they divide the screen real estate into left & right images & use the glasses to make only the relevant image visible to each eye). Their advantage is that polarizing glasses are usually lighter, more comfortable & cheaper than shutter glasses. Also there is no "sweet spot", like most autostereo systems, so multiple viewers can watch 3D at the same time. There is also a company called 3ality (not to be confused with the later-founded and unrelated 3ality Technica) that has developed display technology that is glasses-free and full-resolution - however it has not yet been brought to the market.