fluorescent lamp in lcd panel and inverter circuit supplier

LCD Inverters carry 90-Day warrantyInverter board for LCD panel Liquid crystal display (LCD) panels are used in various applications ranging from smaller portable electronic equipment to larger fixed location units.The LCD panel itself cannot emit light. Therefore, a backlight system that supplies the light from behind is normally required. Currently, the most commonly used light emitting device is a fluorescent tube called a cold cathode tube or CCFL.A special power supply, the inverter, which generates approximately 1000 to 1500V AC is required to drive a CCFL. This inverter is a small power supply used to make this CCFL illuminate, and is one of the important functional parts of a complete LCD display.Electronica make available for the after-sale market a wide range of Original Inverter board for the repair of LCD panel used in the new generation of LCD TV.The Original Inverter are originally mounted on the LCD panels that the major panel maker , like AUO, CMO, LG, SAMSUNG etc., supply to the worldwide LCD TV manufacturers.You can check the availability of the required inverter with the Search Button Above

A CCFL inverter is an electrical inverter that supplies alternating current power to a cold cathode fluorescent lamp (CCFL). CCFLs are often used as inexpensive light units in electrical devices that are powered by direct current sources such as batteries. CCFL inverters are small, have switchover efficiency over 80%, and offer adjustable output of light. They are widely used for backlights for LCDs, or for rear lighting in advertising signs.

As for the inverter circuit of a cold cathode fluorescent lamp, a resonance type circuit has been widely used. This is sometimes referred to as the "Royer circuit". However the proper definition of the Royer circuit requires that the inversion of a switching operation be performed in a state in which the transformer is saturated. An inverter circuit which performs the inversion operation by utilizing resonance in the collector circuit of a transistor is preferably referred to as the "Baxandall converter" in distinction from a true Royer circuit.

The early designs of an inverter circuit for a cold cathode fluorescent lamp did not utilize the resonance method of a secondary circuit at all. Instead the so-called closed magnetic circuit type transformer having a small leakage inductance was used as a step-up transformer. The leakage inductance was such that it reduced the output voltage on the secondary side of the transformer. Since this was not desirable, it had to be made as small as possible.

P.J. Baxandall, "Transistor Sine-Wave LC Oscillators", International Convention on Transistors and Associated Semiconductor Devices, 25 May 1959, fig 5, p. 751

Shenzhen Lampda Photoelectric Technology Co.,Ltd located in High-tech Park of Baolong Industrial City,is a professional high-tech enterprises engaged in energy saving, environmental protection, and low-carbon lighting, specialized in the development,manufacturing and sales of the CCFL (cold cathode fluorescent lamps). we have been shenzhen for 10years, It is the one of few companies who can produce such horniness glass in China.

Urrently we already have the mass production of the CCFL Backlight Tubes, CCFL T8 tube,CCFL spiral bulbs(3w-25w),CCFL Grille Lamp,CCFL T5 Bracket(stent)lights,CCFL street light,CCFL Spotlights,and other new energy-efficient lighting products.

by:CE,PSE,RoHS,SAA(Pending). And products are now not only sold in China, But Asian countries,like Japan and South Korea,the Middle East,Europe and the United States,and other countries and regions.

We have received many requests for LCD’s that contain a CCFL backlight (aka: cold-cathode fluorescent lamps backlight). We are finding it more and more difficult to supply a CCFL backlight.

The Liquid crystal displays we talk about in this article are monochrome LCD displays; this includes alphanumeric LCD displays and graphic displays. We do not cover TFT LCD’s or OLED’s in this discussion.

Does not provide as even light on larger displays as a CCFL. On a larger display it may be possible to see hot and cold spots. (Although a diffuser can help to reduce this)

An estimated 80% of our character LCD displays are supplied with LED backlight or LED edge lit. 15% of alphanumeric LCD displays are supplied with no backlight. The last 5% of numeric LCD displays are supplied with EL backlight.

8x1 LCD display, 8x2 LCD display, 16x1 LCD display, 16x2 LCD display, 16x4 LCD display, 20x2 LCD display, 20x4 LCD display, 24x2 LCD display, 40x1 LCD display, 40x2 LCD display, 40x4 LCD display.

Segment Display’s do not contain a backlight as a standard option. It is possible to order a separate backlight. This would need to be ordered as a custom LCD module. See

IProducts: Products: Power IC, Control IC, Hall IC, Bipolar Transistor, MOS FET, IGBT, Thyristor, Rectifier Diode, LED (Light Emitting Diode), CCFL (Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp),

Switching Power Supply, UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply), DC Power Supply, Inverter, Universal Airway Beacon System and Other Power Supplies and Equipments

Also, as purchaser of these products/technology, you agree to follow the procedures for the export or transfer of these products/technology, under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign

"A Comparative Study of a Class of Full Bridge Zero-Voltage-Switched PWM Converters" W.Chen, F.C. Lee, M.M. Jovanovic and J.A. Sabate1995 IEEE, pp. 893-899. Virginia Power Electronics Center, The Bradley Department of Electrical Engineering.

"A Frequency/PWM Controlled Converter with Two Independently Regulated Outputs" R.A. Fisher, R.L. Steigerwald, C.F. Saj, GE Corporate Research and Development Center, HFPC May 1989 Proceedings pp. 459-471.

"An Introduction to the Principles and Features of Resonant Power Conversion" Steve Freeland; Rockwell International Corporation, Autonetics ICBM Systems Division. pp. 20-43.

"ARC Discharge Supply Component Protection Circuitry" A.F. Ahrens and G. L. Cardwell, Space and Communications Group, Hughes Aircraft Company, El Segundo, California, p. 326-333.

"Class DE Inverters and Rectifiers for DC-DC Converters" by David C. Hamill; Department of Electronics Engineering University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, United Kingdom 8 Pages.

"Resonant Inverters and Their Application to Electronics Ballasts and High Voltage Power Conversions" By Yung Lin Lin A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate College The University of Arizona 1996—243 Pages.

"Zero-Voltage Switching Technique in DC/DC Converters", Kwang-Hwa Liu and Fred C. Lee, Department of Electrical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1986 IEEE, Reprinted with permission; PESC 86; Vancouver BC, Jun. 23-27, 1986; pp. 58-70.

"Zero-Voltage Switching Techniques in DC/DC Converters", Kwang-Hwa Liu and Fred C, Lee, from Recent Developments in Resonant Power Conversion, Intertec Communications, Inc., 1988 pp. 211-223.

A Low-Cost Control IC for Single-Transistor ZVS Cold-Cathode Fluorescent Lamp Inverters and DC/DC Converters, Richard Redl, ELFI S.A. Derrey-la-Cabuche CH-1756 Onnens FR Switzerland, Koji Arakawa Toko, Inc. 18 Oaza Gomigaya Tsurugashimashi Saitama 350-02 Japan 8 pgs.

A New CCFL Inverter Circuit for AMCLD Panels Results in Significantly Higher Efficiency and Brightness. Mehmet Nalbant Linfinity Microelectronics AMLCD 1995 4 pgs.

A Phase-Difference Angle Control-Mode PWM High-Frequency Resonant Inverters Using Static Induction-Transistors and-Thyristors M. Nakatoka, T. Maruhashi, T. Koga, S. Sugawara and T. Nishimura, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe 657 Japan 0275-9306/87/0000-0674 $1.00 1987 IEEE 674-681.

Bitek O2Mirco International Limited Plaintiff v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., SPI Electronics Co., Ltd., FSP Group, Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd, Defendants. and Related Counterclaims. Civil Action No. 2-04-CV-32(TJW) Assigned for All Purpose to the Honorable Judge T. John Ward Jury Trial Demanded—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd"s Final Invalidity Contentions 5 pages Exhibits 8, 10, 12-14, 15a, 15b, 16, 18-23, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38-40, 42, 43, 45-48.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Sumida Corporation and (2) Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 1 Filed Jan. 6, 2003 total 47 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Sumida Corporation and (2) Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Defendant Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc."s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed Sep. 2, 2004 total 230 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Sumida Corporation and (2) Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—O2 Micro International Limited"s Reply Claim Construction Brief Document 96 Filed Dec. 22, 2004 total 37 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Sumida Corporation and (2) Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—O2 Micro International Limited"s Responses to Defendant Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc."s First Set of Requests for Admissions Filed May 16, 2007 total 21 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Sumida Corporation and (2) Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Transcript of Trial Date Nov. 16, 2005 total 120 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Sumida Corporation and Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Sumida Corporation and Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc. Answer to O2 Micro"s Complaint Document 55 Filed Apr. 5, 2004 total 6 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Sumida Corporation et al.—Memorandum Opinion and Order Document 102 Filed Mar. 8, 2005 total 15 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Defendant Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc."s Final Invalidity Contentions and Exhibits Filed May 2, 2005 total 166 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Defendant Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc."s Notice Under 35 U.S.C. §-282 May 3, 2005 total 6 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Expert Report of Clyde M. Brown Jr., P.E. Mar. 25, 2005 total 65 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement and Exhibit A Document 89-1 and 89-2 Filed Oct. 22, 2004 total 60 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Joint Final Pretrial Order Document 178-1 Filed Aug. 23, 2005 total 30 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—Motion for Summary Judgment No. 3 (Invalidity of Claim 39 and 40) Document 125-1 Filed Apr. 27, 2005 total 7 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—O2 Micro International Limited"s Opening Claim Construction Brief Document 90 Filed Dec. 1, 2004 total 33 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—TSE"s Amended Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Document 250 Filed Jan. 9, 2006 total 27 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—TSE"s Reply in Support of Amended Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Document 276 Filed Mar. 6, 2006 total 20 pages.

Case No. 2:03-CV-00007-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Taiwan Sumida Electronics Inc.—U.S. District Court Estern District of Texas (Marshall) Civil Docket for Case #: 2:03-CV-00007-TJW last entry date Jul. 26, 2007 total 31 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (2) Samsung Electronics America, Inc., (3) Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., and (4) Samsung SDI America, Inc.—First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 2-1 Filed Oct. 15, 2004 total 7 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc."s Supplemental Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Filed Sep. 1, 2006 total 315 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Deposition of Yung-Lin Lin vol. II Date: Jan. 30, 2007 total 120 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Defendants" Motion for Summary Judgment on Invalidity of Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,707,264 Document 131 Filed Feb. 21, 2007 total 8 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Defendants" Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,707,264 Document 169 Filed Mar. 16, 2007 total 3 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc."s Notice Under 35 U.S.C. § 282 Document 141 Filed Mar. 2, 2007 total 9 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc."s Second Amended Answer Document 108 Filed Dec. 7, 2006 total 19 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Joint Final Pretrial Order Document 207 Filed Apr. 2, 2007 total 67 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc."s Responsive Brief on Claim Construction Document 60-1 Filed Mar. 3, 2006 total 44 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.—U.S. District Court [Live] Eastern District of Texas Live (Marshall) Civil Docket for Case #: 2:04-CV-00323-TJW last entry date Jul. 31, 2007 total 30 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al—Memorandum Opinion and Order Document 84 Filed Jun. 28, 2006 total 16 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., and Samsung SDI America, Inc.—Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc."s Answer to Plaintiff"s First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims Document 12 Filed Mar. 8, 2005 Total 11 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., and Samsung SDI America, Inc.—Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc."s First Amended Answer Document 66 Filed Mar. 20, 2006 total 18 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., and Samsung SDI America, Inc.—Defendants Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Samsung SDI America, Inc."s Answer to Plaintiff"s First Amended Complaint, and Counterclaims Document 16 Filed Mar. 22, 2005 Total 11 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., and Samsung SDI America, Inc.—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Opening Claim Construction Brief Document 57-1 Filed Feb. 17, 2006 Total 50 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., and Samsung SDI America, Inc.—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Reply Brief on Claim Construction Document 63 Filed Mar. 17, 2006 total 26 pages.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.—Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 1-1 Filed Sep. 3, 2004 pp. 1-6.

Case No. 2:04-cv-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.—Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement in Complaince With PLR-4-3 Document 56-1 Filed Jan. 9, 2006 total 39 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., et al.—Videotaped Deposition of Yung-Lin Lin Date Oct. 6, 2005 total 88 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; (2) SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; (3) FSP Group and (4) Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. SPI Electronic Co. Ltd. v. O2 Micro International Limited—SPI"s Answer to Complaint and Counterclaims Document 6 Filed May 26, 2004 total 7 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; (2) SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; (3) FSP Group and (4) Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 1 Filed Jan. 30, 2004 total 6 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; (2) SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; (3) FSP Group and (4) Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Document 94-1 to 94-6 Filed Mar. 21, 2005 total 42 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; (2) SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; (3) FSP Group and (4) Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—O2 Micro"s Responses and Objections to Bitek"s First Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 1-8) and Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 19) Filed Nov. 9, 2004 total 11 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; (2) SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; (3) FSP Group and (4) Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Transcript of Trial Date: May 15, 2006 total 51 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd et al.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd."s Supplemental Brief Regarding Inequitable Conduct Document 411 Filed Dec. 12, 2006 total 21 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd et al.—Order Document 129 Filed Aug. 26, 2005 total 2 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. O2 Micro Internal Limited—Answer and Counterclaim of Defendants Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Document 12 Filed Jul. 8, 2004 total 12 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. O2 Micro Internal Limited—Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaim of Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Document 50 Filed Dec. 2, 2004 total 21 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. O2 Micro Internal Limited—Lien Chang"s Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims Document 51 Filed Dec. 3, 2004 total 9 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., SPI, and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. O2 Micro Internal Limited—First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 47 Filed Nov. 17, 2004 total 8 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd. and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. O2 Micro Internal Limited—O2 Micro International Limited"s Opening Claim Construction Brief Document 102-1 Filed Apr. 25, 2005 total 21 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd. and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. O2 Micro Internal Limited—O2 Micro International Limited"s Reply Claim Construction Brief Document 116 Filed Jun. 6, 2005 total 9 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Answer to First Amended Complaint and Amended Counterclaims Document 49 Filed Dec. 2, 2004 total 14 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd."s Final Invalidity Contentions Filed Oct. 17, 2005 total 259 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd."s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Document 169 Filed Nov. 2, 2005 total p. 24.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd."s Motion for Summary Judgment of Unenforceablity Due to Inequitable Conduct Document 171 Filed Nov. 2, 2005 total 16 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd."s Reply to O2 Micro International Ltd."s Oppositeion to Bitek"s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Document 221 Filed Nov. 23, 2005 total 7 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd."s Reply to O2 Micro International Ltd."s Oppositeion to Bitek"s Motion for Summary Judgment of Unenforceablity Due to Inequitable Conduct Document 220 Filed Nov. 23, 2005 total 7 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Defendant Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd"s Responsive Brief on Claim Construction Document 108-1 Filed May 10, 2005 total 17 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Expert Report of Dr. Praveen Jain Document 218 Filed Nov. 22, 2005 total 96 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—FSP Group"s Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims Document 118 Filed Jul. 15, 2005 total 14 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—Second Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order Document 352 Filed May 9, 2006 total 54 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—SPI Electronic"s Response Brief in Support of Its Proposed Claim Construction Document 105 Filed May 9, 2005 total 17 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-32-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; FSP Group and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd.—US District Court Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) Docket Sheet Case #: 2:04-CV-0032-TJW last entry date: Jul. 26, 2007 total 46 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; (2) Compal Electronics, Inc.; (3) Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (4) Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., (5) Asustek Computer Inc.; (6) Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (7) Asustech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (8) Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited; and (9) Michael Hisng Compal Electronics, Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., (10) Delta Electronics, Inc.; and (11) Delta Products Corporation—Compal Electronics, Inc.,"s Answer to Plaintiff O2MICRO International Limited"s Second Amended Complaint Document 117-1 Filed Dec. 2, 2005 total 19 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; (2) Compal Electronics, Inc.; (3) Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (4) Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., (5) Asustek Computer Inc.; (6) Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (7) Asustech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (8) Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited; and (9) Michael Hisng—Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Unfair Competition Document 112 Filed Nov. 18, 2005 total 12 pages.

Case No. 2:04CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; (2) Compal Electronics, Inc.; (3) Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (4) Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., (5) Asustek Computer Inc.; (6) Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (7) Asustech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (8) Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited—First Amended Cmoplaint for Patent Infringement Document 9-1 Filed Dec. 6, 2004 total 10 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; (2) Compal Electronics, Inc.; (3) Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (4) Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., (5) Asustek Computer Inc.; (6) Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (7) Asustech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (8) Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Reply Claim Construction Brief Document 163 Filed Jan. 26, 2006 total 38 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; (2) Compal Electronics, Inc.; (3) Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (4) Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., (5) Asustek Computer Inc.; (6) Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (7) Asustech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; and (8) Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited—Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement and Exhibit A-F Document 120 Filed Dec. 2, 2005 total 57 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; (2) Compal Electronics, Inc.; (3) Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (4) Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan)-Co., Ltd., (5) Asustek Computer-Inc.; (6) Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (7) Asustech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (8) Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited Compal Electronics, Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; Delta Electronics, Inc.; Delta Products Corporation—Compal Electronics, Inc."s First Amended Answer to Plaintiff"s First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 53 Filed Aug. 29, 2005 total 21 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al., Compal Electronics, Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.; Delta Electronics, Inc.; Delta Products Corporation Delta Electronics, Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Compal Electronics, Inc.,—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s Amended Answer to Delta Electronics, Inc."s Cross-Complaint, Amended Counterclaim Against Delta Electronics, Inc. and Amended Third Party Complaint Against O2 Micro International Limited Document 139 Filed Jan. 9, 2006 total 16 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Defendant Michael Hsing"s Answer to Second Amended Complaint Document 145 Filed Jan. 9, 2006 total 11 pages.

Case No. 2:04CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Defendant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s Answer to Second Amended Complaint; Counterclaims Document 144 Filed Jan. 9, 2006 total 23 pages.

Case No. 2:04CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Defendants" Responsive Claim Construction Brief Document 149 Filed Jan. 17, 2006 total 38 pages.

Case No. 2:04CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Michael Hisng"s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Asustek Computer Inc."s, and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Mar. 31, 2006 total 31 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s Answer to Delta Electronics, Inc."s Cross-Complaint, Counterclaim Against Delta Electronics, Inc., and Third Party Complaint Against O2 Micro International Limited Document 125 Filed Dec. 19, 2005 total 15 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Motion and Brief in Support of Asustek Computer, Inc."s Motion for Summary Judgment Document 169 Filed Feb. 3, 2006 total 30 pages.

Case No. 2:04CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—Reply in Support of Asustek Computer, Inc."s Motion for Summary Judgment Document 196 Filed Mar. 10, 2006 total 20 pages.

Case No. 2:04CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.,—U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) Civil Docket for Case #: 2:04-CV-00359-TJW last entry date: May 8, 2006 total 30 pages.

Case No. 2:04-CV-359-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s Answer to First Amended Complaint; Counterclaims Document 12 Filed Dec. 13, 2004 total 17 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Microsemi Corporations" Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,804,129, 6,259,615 and 6,396,722 Filed Jul. 2, 2007 total 1278 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 1-1 Filed Jun. 3, 2005 total 7 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 84 Filed Dec. 11, 2006 total 9 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Rohm Co. Ltd."s Amended Answer to O2 Micro"s First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, First Amended Defenses, and Second Amended Counterclaims Document 102 Filed Feb. 1, 2007 total 71 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Rohm Co. Ltd."s Answer to O2 Micro"s First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, First Amended Defenses, and First Amended Counterclaims Document 89 Filed Jan. 5, 2007 total 71 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Rohm Co., Ltd."s Invalidity Contentions Date Jul. 2, 2007 total 397 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc."s Answer to O2 Micro"s Complaint Document 41 Filed Feb. 16, 2006 total 29 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc."s Answer to O2 Micro"s First Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims Document 100 Filed Jan. 30, 2007 total 62 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation (3) Sony EMCS Corporation (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc.—Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc."s Answer to O2 Micro"s First Amended Complaint With Counterclaims Document 90 Filed Jan. 5, 2007 total 63 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc.—Defendant Rohm Co. Ltd."s Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiff"s Complaint Document 38 Filed Feb. 15, 2006 total 10 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: (1) O2 Micro International Limited v. (1)Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation, (3) Sony EMCS Corporation, (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc. (1) Sony Corporation and (2) Sony Electronics Inc. v. (1) Microsemi Corporation—Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3 and Exhibit A-D Document 167 Filed Jul. 18, 2007 total 81 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: (1) O2 Micro International Limited v. (1)Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation, (3) Sony EMCS Corporation, (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Opening Claim Construction Brief Document 172 Filed Jul. 23, 2007 total 18 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: (1) O2 Micro International Limited v. (1)Rohm Co., Ltd., (2) Sony Corporation, (3) Sony EMCS Corporation, (4) Sony Corporation of America and (5) Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Reply Claim Construction Brief Document 209 Filed Aug. 13, 2007 total 30 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Microsemi Corporations" Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,804,129, 6,259,615 and 6,396,722 total 28 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Microsemi Corporation"s Reply to Counterclaims of O2 Micro International Limited and Demand for Jury Trial Document 139 Filed Jun. 1, 2007 total 14 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Microsemi Corporation"s Responsive Brief on Claim Construction Document 199 Filed Aug. 8, 2007 total 53 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Notice of Filing Joint Claim Construction Chart and Exhibit A-C Document 223 total 122 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Rohm Co., Ltd."s Invalidity Contentions total 18 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Rohm"s Responsive Brief on Claim Construction Document 198 Filed Aug. 8, 2007 total 43 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Third-Party Defendant Microsemi Corporation"s Answer to Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc."s Third-Party Complaint; and Microsemi Corporation"s Amended Claims Against Plaintiff O2 Micro International Ltd. Document 160 Filed Jul. 9, 2007 total 51 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—Third-Party Defendant Microsemi Corporation"s Answer to Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc."s Third-Party Complaint; and Microsemi Corporation"s Claims Against Plaintiff O2 Micro International Ltd. Document 128 Filed Apr. 13, 2007 total 39 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00211-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics Inc. Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics Inc. v. Microsemi Corporation—U.S. District Court [Live] Eastern District of Texas Live (Marshall) Civil Docket for Case #: 2:05-CV-00211-TJW last entry date Aug. 24, 2007 total 29 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-0323 (TJW): O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd."s Updated Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Exhibits Filed Sep. 15, 2006 total 853 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-0323 (TJW): O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—O2 Micro International Ltd."s Objections and Responses to Defendant"s First Set of Requests for Admissions Filed May 16, 2007 total 21 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-0323 (TJW): O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Videotaped Deposition of Yung-Lin Lin Date: Mar. 23, 2007 total 108 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-0323 : O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. et al.—Order Document 165 Filed Jul. 31, 2007 total 1 page.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and (2) Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Complaint for Patent Infringement Document 1-1 Filed Jul. 18, 2005 total 6 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. (1) Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and (2) Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Reply Claim Construction Brief Document 90 Filed Dec. 18, 2006 total 28 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Answer and Demand for Jury by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn Document 13 filed Sep. 23, 2005 total 8 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—First Amended Answer and Counterclaims by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/s/a Foxconn Document 30 Filed Feb. 3, 2006 total 19 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Honhai"s Claim Construction Brief Document 88 Filed Dec. 7, 2006 total 39 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement and Exhibit A Document 82 Filed Oct. 26, 2006 total 44 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Opening Claim Construction Brief Document 83 Filed Nov. 16, 2006 total 8 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Defendant Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd"s Motion for Summary Judgment Document 134 Filed May 14, 2007 total 52 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Defendant Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd"s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Filed Mar. 28, 2006 total 33 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd."s Updated Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Sep. 15, 2006 total 40 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Response in Opposition to Second Supplement to Hon Hai"s Claim Construction Brief Regarding the Reexamination of O2 Micro"s "615 and "722 Patents Document 125 Filed Apr. 9, 2007 total 12 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—Reply in Support of Hon Hai"s Second Supplement to Its Claim Construction Brief Document 127 Filed Apr. 16, 2007 total 9 pages.

Case No. 2:05-CV-323-TJW-CE: O2 Micro International Limited v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a Foxconn, and Ambit Microsystems Corporation—U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) Docket Sheet for Case #: 2:05-CV-323 last entry date Aug. 20, 2007 total 26 pages.

Case No. 2006-1411, -1436: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit O2 Micro International Limited vs. Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 2:03-CV-00007, Judge T. John Ward.—Appellant Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc."s Reply Brief Filed Feb. 28, 2007 total 40 pages.

Case No. 2006-1411, -1436: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit O2 Micro International Limited vs. Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 2:03-CV-00007, Judge T. John Ward.—Brief for Defendant-Appellant Filed: Oct. 3, 2006 total 129 pages.

Case No. 2007-1302, 1303, 1304 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; and FSP Group and SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in 2:04-CV-32 Hon. T. John Ward—Brief of Defendant—Appellant Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Filed Jul. 16, 2007 total 101 pages.

Case No. 2007-1302, 1303, 1304 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; and FSP Group and SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in 2:04-CV-32 Hon. T. John Ward—Opening Brief of Appellants FSP Grouop and SPI Electronic Co., Ltd (Now Named FSP Technology Inc.) Filed Jul. 16, 2007 total 75 pages.

Case No. 2007-1302, 1303, 1304 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.; and FSP Group and SPI Electronic Co., Ltd.; and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in 2:04-CV-32 Hon. T. John Ward—Principal Brief of Defendant-Appellant Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd. Filed Jul. 16, 2007 total 66 pages.

Case No. 2-04-CV-369 LED, O2 Micrio International Limited (Plaintiff) v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., et al. (Defendants), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc"s Answer to First Ameneded Compaint: Counterclaims, Dec. 13, 2004, 17 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Asustek"S Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Order Denying Its Motion for Summary Judgment Document 808 Filed Mar. 19, 2007 total 5 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Civil L.R. 7-9(B)(2) Motion for Reconsideration of Claim Construction Ruling and for Further Construction in View of New Intrinsic Evidence Submitted in Pending Reexamination Proceedings Document 804 Filed Mar. 15, 2007 total 13 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Corrected Reply in Support of Defendants" Motion for Reconsideration of Order on Claim Construction Document 821 Filed Mar. 27, 2007 total 19 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Defendants"Monolithic Power Systems, ASMC, Asustek, Compal, and Michael Hisng"s Discovery Designations Document 850 Filed Apr. 10, 2007 total 8 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Defendants Monolithic Power Systems, ASMC, Asustek, Compal"s Conditional Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity Due to MPS"s Prior Invention Date; Motion to Strike Testimony and Evidence Document 1002 Filed May 10, 2007 total 10 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Defendants" Motion for a Determination as a Matter of Law That O2 Micro Has No Evidence of the Required Nexus Between the Asserted Patent Claims and (1) The Commercial Success of Its Products, (2) Copying; or (3) Any Other Secondary Consideration of Non-Obviousness Document 998 Filed May 9, 2007 total 8 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Defendants" Oppositeion to Motion to Preclude Reference to OZ Datasheets or Products as Prior Art Document 1033-1 Filed May 13, 2007 total 4 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Expert Report of Jonathan R. Wood, May 5, 2006 total 78 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Expert Report of Lawrence J. Goffney May 5, 2006 total 52 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Expert Report of Mark N. Horenstein, Ph.D., P.E. May 5, 2006 total 147 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Expert Report of the Hornorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff, May 5, 2006 total 48 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Joint Pretrial Conference Statement (Jury Trial) Document 857 Filed Apr. 10, 2007 total 41 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Monolithic Power Systems, ASMC, and Asustek"s Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying MPS" Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the "722 Patent and Denying Asustek"s Motion for Summary Judgment Document 778 Filed Mar. 1, 2007 total: 10 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Apr. 5, 2006 total 296 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Michael Hisng"s, Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd."s, Asustek Computer, Inc."s, and Compal Electronics, Inc."s (1) Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Oppositeion to Motion for Summary Judgment, and (3) Claim Construction Brief Document 363-1 Filed Sep. 1, 2006 total 48 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Michael Hisng"s, Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd."s, Asustek Computer, Inc."s, and Compal Electronics, Inc."s Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Document 504 Filed Sep. 29, 2006 total 27 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the "722 Patent Are Obvious Document 1009 Filed May 10, 2007 total 6 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—MPS, Asustek, ASMC, and Compal"s Disclosure Pursuant to 35 U.S.C§ 282 Mar. 30, 2007 total 14 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—O2 Micro International Limited"s (1) Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Reply Claim Construction Brief and (3) Oppositeion to Defendants" Motions for Summary Judgment Document 417 Filed Sep. 15, 2006 total 40 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—O2Micro International Limited"s Proposed Construction of "Phase Overlap" Document 1015 Filed May 10, 2007 total 3 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Order on Claim Construction and Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Document 741 Filed Feb. 8, 2007 total 30 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Reply in Support of Defendants" Motion for Reconsideration of Order on Claim Construction Document 818 Filed Mar. 27, 2007 total 19 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Reply to O2 Micro"s Opposition to Asustek Computer, Inc."s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment Document 824 Filed Mar. 28, 2007 total 8 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—U.S. District Court Northern District of California Docket Sheet for Case #: 4:05-CV-2000 last entry date Jun. 25, 2007 total 185 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW (consolidated with C 06-2929): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Verdict Form Document 1045 Filed May 15, 2007 total 5 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement [Patent L.R.4-3] and Exhibit A-J Document 172 and 172-2-172-11 Filed Apr. 20, 2006 total 237 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s First Amended Answer to O2 Micro International Limited"s First Amended Counterclaim Document 286 Filed Aug. 3, 2006 total 12 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Motion and Brief in Support of Monolithic Power Systems"Motion for Summary Judgment That the Claims of the O2 Micro"722 Patent Are Not Valid Document 132 Filed Mar. 21, 2006 total 26 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Reply in Support of Monolithic Power Systems"Motion for Summary Judgment That the Claims of the O2 Micro"722 Patent Are Not Valid Document 161 Filed Apr. 11, 2006 total 17 pages.

Case No. 4:04-cv-02000-CW: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International.—Answer to O2 Micro"s First Amended Counterclaim Document 22 Filed Sep. 14, 2004 total 5 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW (C04-2000CW): O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Limited: Jury Trial Transcript of Proceedings Date: May 14, 2007 vol. 9 pp. 1528-1696 total 144 Pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW (C04-2000CW): O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., et. al.,—Michael Hisng"s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions filed Aug. 7, 2006 total 524 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW (C04-2000CW): O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., et. al.,—Michael Hisng"s, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Asustek Computer Inc."s, and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Final Invalidity Contentions, Certificate of Service and MPS, Asustek, ASMC, and Compal"s Disclosure Pursuant to 35 U.S.0 §282 and Exhibits Filed Aug. 24, 2007 total 539 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al. Michael Hisng"s, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Asustek Computer Inc."s and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Final Invalidity Contentions Aug. 24, 2006 total 30 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation"s Answer and Counterclaims to O2"s Third Amended Complaint Document 45 Filed Jul. 28, 2006 total 18 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—Asustek Computer, Inc."s Answer and Counterclaims to O2"s Micro"s Third Amended Complaint Document 42 Filed Jul. 28, 2006 total 19 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—Michael Hisng"s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Asustek Computer Inc."s, and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and Exhibits Filed Jul. 28, 2006 total 797 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—Michael Hisng"s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s, Asustek Computer Inc."s, and Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Ltd."s Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Aug. 7, 2006 total 33 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—Michael R. Hisng"s Answer to O2 Micro"s Thrid Amended Complaint Document 43 Filed Jul. 28, 2006 total 10 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—Monolithic Power Systems, Inc."s Answer and Counterclaims to O2 Micro"s Third Amended Complaint Document 44 Filed Jul. 28, 2006 total 29 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) Civil Docket for Case #: 4:06-CV-02929-CW last entry date: Sep. 14, 2006 total 9 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Asustek Computer, Inc., Michael Hisng, Compal Electronics Inc., Compal Information (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Compal Electronics Technology (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Asustek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited a/k/a Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation of Shanghai—[Proposed] Third Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Unfair Competition; Demand for Jury Trial Document 39 Filed Jul. 26, 2006 total 10 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., et al.—Compal Electronics, Inc."s [Proposed] Answer to Plaintiff O2 Micro International Limited"s Third Amended Complaint Document 41 Filed Jul. 28, 2006 total 22 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.—Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation"s Answer and Counterclaims to O2"s Second Amended Complaint Document 4-1 Filed May 19, 2006 total 17 pages.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02929-CW: O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.—Asustek Compluter, Inc."s Answer and Counterclaims to O2"s Second Amended Complaint Document 6-1 Filed May 19, 2006 total 19 pages.

Case No. C04 02000: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Complaint for Declaratory Judgement Document 1, filed May 20, 2004 total 6 pages.

Case No. C04 02000: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Defendants" Renewed Monions for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Conditional Motions for New Trial Document 1088 Filed Jul. 27, 2007 total 32 pages.

Case No. C04 02000: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—O2 Micro International Limited"s Response to Counter-defendant Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited"s First Set of Requests for Admission Filed Jun. 28, 2006 total 14 pages.

Case No. C04 02000: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—O2 Micro International Limited"s Response to Monolithic Ower Systems, Inc."s First Set of Requests for Admission Filed Jun. 28, 2006 total 45 pages.

Case No. C04 02000: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.—Trial Exhibit "Development of the Versatile Electronic Ballast for Metal Halide Lamps With Phase-Shift Soft-Switching Control" by C.L. Tsay et, al. pp. MPS "129001108 to MPS "129 001115 total 8 pages.

Case No. C04 02000CW (C06-02929CW): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.,and O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—O2 Micro International Ltd."s Responses and Objections to Monolithic Ower Systems, Inc., Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation of Shanghai, Asustek Computer, Inc., and Michael Hisng"s First Set of Request for Admissions (Nos. 1-11) Filed Aug. 18, 2006 total 8 pages.

Case No. C04 02000CW (C06-02929CW): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.,and O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—O2 Micro International Ltd."s Responses and Objections to Monolithic Ower Systems, Inc."s First Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 1-154) Filed Aug. 28, 2006 total 53 pages.

Case No. C04 02000CW (C06-02929CW): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.,and O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al.—O2 Micro International Ltd."s Responses to Counter-Defendant Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited"s First Set of Requests for Admission Filed Aug. 28, 2006 total 19 pages.

Case No. C04 02000CW (C06-02929CW): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.,—Defendants"Reply in Support of Their Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial and Oppositeion to O2 Micro"s Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law or a New Trial Document 1108 Filed Aug. 17, 2007 total 68 pages.

Case No. C04 02000CW (C06-02929CW): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.,—MPS and Asustek"s Reply in Support of Their Inequitable Conduct Defense Document 1116 Filed Aug. 24, 2007 total 18 pages.

Case No. C04 02000CW (C06-02929CW): Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd.,—MPS"s and Asustek"s Opening Brief on Inequitable Conduct Document 1096 Filed Aug. 10, 2007 total 30 pages.

Case No. SACV 04-1174 CJC (ANx) Microsemi Corporation Plaintiff v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. Defendant Declaration of Doyle Slack, Filed by Defendant/Counterclaimant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Asserted Claims of U.S