lcd touch screen s9 plus free sample

In Union Repair store, we grade our iPhone screen into 5 different types of quality on the basis of different material assembled. The following is the full details of each condition.

It is with widely accept major complaint replacements for original parts, which keeps a right balance between price and quality. It has sustainable supplying chain in China, and all the components of the screen are copy quality. Typically, the LCD screen is from several different factories, the most popular 4 on China market are JK,AUO, LongTeng, and ShenChao. By comparing the brightness and sharpness of the LCD, we found JK is the best quality among them and the second best is AUO. No doubt, the other components on the screen are all copy.

It is better than After Market Basic cause it comes with original laminated flexes and the LCD panel. Other components like touch panel, frame(hot pressed), backlight, polarize lens, and OCA is all copy from different factories.

The core components (like LCD and flexes) is 100% original pulled from used iPhone while the frame and touch panel is copy. The touch panel and frame come together with cold pressed glue and assembled together with the LCD by the capable third-party factory which keeps its excellent quality.

No doubt, it is tear down from used iPhone with all the parts 100% original and working perfectly just like an original new screen, it has whatever the original new screen has. The only complaint about this quality is that some of the displays are with 1 or 2 scratches but still be welcome by our critical customers who are requiring good quality.

It is 100% original from Apple-authorized factories like Toshiba, Sharp, and LG. We get this kind of screen from the first level dealer. The touch panel of the screen is oleophobic coated which prevents from fingerprints when using your iPhone. And starting with iPhone 7g, the backlight from different authorized factories comes with a different code. Backlight from Sharp has the code begins with DKH/CON, from Toshiba begins with C11/F7C/FZQ, from LG begins with DTP/C3F.

*If you travel internationally and are "data roaming" as I do, you will get a nearly full screen warning about data roaming multiple times a day. I can find no way to stop the messages.

A good fair review. I have had the xynoss S9+ a few weeks now and was so impressed that is was my only vacation camera. I usually take an APS-C nikon coolpix A which is superb but for holiday snaps, the S9 is good enough and versatile allowing editing in phone and video capture with editing of both photo and video in camera.

We"ve only had a few days with the Huawei P20 Pro but that has been long enough to say it is the most advanced smartphone camera to date. General image quality is very good, with good detail, very low noise levels across all light levels and excellent dynamic range. In terms of those parameters the differences to other flagship smartphones, for example the Google Pixel 2 or Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus aren"t massive, however.

I have both the S9+ and X, and reading both articles I was intrigued to see the level of detailed criticism (all of it valid to some degree) of the S9+, but going back to the iPhone, to see a lot of soft-pedalling around equivalent features which the iPhone is frequently (a lot) worse at. The author seems to take as gospel that an Apple buzzword will work as advertised, while the Samsung gets a far greater shakedown.

To be frank, we are revamping these reviews and are learning as we go. That may be partly responsible for what you see as the greater shakedown of the Samsung. On the other hand, I brought an iPhone X and Samsung S9+ along with me to do portrait shooting side-by-side for this very review, and the Samsung struggled far more than the Apple in the situations they were both used in. That is a portion of the basis for our assessment.

While photographically S9 Plus may be close to Huawei P20 Pro and is better than many other phones, rest assured that you will wait for Android version updates and even important regular security updates for a very long time. That"s even more dissapointing having known how much their phones cost so thay shouldn"t be saving money on software development costs.

I have been Samsung phone owner for past few years but that was one, among few major factors, why I did not continue with Samsung, at least for some time. P20 Pro was one of possible options to choose from but since quality of phone photography wasn"t a deal breaker for me, I decided to go with OnePlus 6.

I got the S9 (non-plus) last weekend, and am suitably impressed by the single camera it has. I was able to take pictures and video with a phone camera at the fireworks show at Epcot that were surprisingly competitive with my Panasonic GH2. Verizon had a great deal through Best Buy where the phone was almost half price through their service (I pay for it through massive phone bills anyways).

The S9+ was simply too darned large when combined with a case, which you will want, simply because the "glass" enclosure is like a fresh wet watermelon seed in your hand. No grip whatsoever. I really wanted it, but the size is silly. Still happy with the S9.

IMHO any phone larger than an S9 is "silly" in that the length and or width gets in a range that if you at all need to stuff it in a pocket, it is likely to get a lot of bending force applied to it. My old Motorola Turbo 2 (Loved that phone!) was bent due to this, and it was the same size as the S9, but much more tolerant since the face was unbreakable plastic! Now I have an Otter case to minimize this possibility of a bend.

One of the leading causes of a cracked screen is bending applied to the rear enclosure putting tension on the display surface, so that when the phone is dropped, the tension is released by cracking. The Samsung enclosure is quite different, so this may not be an issue.

At BB I tried each phone, and the S9+ and case was a tight fit in a front pocket, the top pokes out, and I am not a small person. The S9 and case fit easily. Honestly I was disappointed because the telephoto camera would be useful.

Have just reviewed S9+ video and it"s terrible (though no worse than competitors). Video is generally fine if not moving, but if any type of panning or turning or movement, it turns to garbage very quickly - Massive jello wobble, herky jerky frames, and motion blur. Video is just not there yet with mobile phones. Not even close.

My partner switched from iPhone 6 to samsung S9 and regrets it. She relied on the "wallet" feature iphone has - android doesn"t have anything that competes.

I"ve recently upgraded to a to the S9+ from a Note 5 (nearly 3 years old) I"m really lmpressed with the S9+, it"s a beautiful, refined piece of technology . The camera is quite good for a phone camera, I"ve only used the normal wide angle lens, and the results are more than satisfactory. Mostly, I wanted good enough IQ to post on Instagram, and for this use, the S9+ is certainly good enough. Of course such a small sensor camera will suffer in low light, I can never figure out why people here have to make such a big deal about that, its a limitation; deal with it.

I"m going to just go ahead and say it: The camera on the S9+ Is a real camera. That doesn"t mean that i"m going to throw away all my other camera gear, it"s just that the S9 makes an awesome always with me camera.

I recently upgraded from the S5 to the S9 Plus. I haven"t used the camera a great deal, but it is clearly superior in every respect. Overall operation is snappier, the OS is more advanced and the display excellent. I like the bigger screen for video and GPS. I overlooked the wireless charging in my purchase decision, but I"m surprised at how much I enjoy the high speed wireless charging for my car and bedside. The S9 Plus has tremendous battery life--I"ve never come close to running halfway down in a single day.

The S9 Plus also sports removable storage via a microSD card, decent water resistance, a real earphone jack, but NO user-replaceable battery like the old S5. The curved screen is really more of a gimmick than anything and Bixby and dedicated Bixby button is a waste and should be user-programmable for Google. In all honestly, I wish Samsung would just introduce an advanced S5 with a snappier processor, screen and camera--it would sell a ton.

1. Pixel 2 xl which was released last year, takes amazing photos in portrait mode. Samsung could have learnt something from them, but the portrait mode in S9+ sucks. Just to check the camera I bought Pixel 2 xl (for cheap) and I can guarantee no other smartphone camera can beat in terms of camera. Also, extra sharpening in S9+ should not have been default (you could change in editing software)

2. Front facing camera. Compared to all other phones, Galaxy S9+ has a decent front facing camera. But if you ever tried Pixel 2 XL front facing camera, you hate the selfies from S9+. Again, Samsung could have learnt from Pixel.

That said, sadly I will be selling Pixel 2 xl, because I like GS9+ design and theme ability..folders.. so on. Once used to Galaxy can"t be happy with other phone (except camera area).

2. Samsung Experience launcher - This is the best launcher in any smartphone.. period. Samsung came a long way from stupid touchwiz and theming is a great addon.

I have a Note8, and before that, S7, S6, Note4 etc, each took/takes superb photos and shoots tack sharp video - when viewed on their host device screen, nor a regular monitor. However, I recently went back to a "real" camera and bought a Panasonic LX100, and I have owned a lot of cameras prior to that, inc Panasonic GH2, Pentax K10D, Sony f717 and so on. Bottom line, when I view ALL my photos (from scanned in ones from 1960s to today) on my LG 4K 32" monitor (£800 worth!), the LX100 blows phone images out of the water. The 4K video it shoots is even more tack sharp (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3YNdXNeqzM&t=72s), and the still images are film like. Most importantly, in particular with 8K coming soon (yes, it will be in 2021 where 4K is today), when you zoom in, you don"t see the artefacts common with phone cameras that have much smaller sensors and lenses.

I tried the S9+ for a while. I have had samsung for the last 3 years and was very pleased with the S6 edge+. Somehow the s9+ didnt manage to capture (pun intended) my imagination - also here in Europe we unfortunately have the s9+ with the lacking Exynos 9810 chipset.

To me S9 is being the most inconsistent performer here, as it "smears subtle details introducing heavy sharpening artifacts in their place compared to the competition" in 1st and 3rd samples. Not to mention the fact that the zoom performance is consistently below P20 Pro or even iPhone X in terms of overall details. It"s also the only one which blew up the highlight in the last sample of daylight shots. P20 Pro"s samples in a day are nothing worth praising but Pixel and iPhone X were far better than S9 in terms of overall consistency(though those phones also have their own problems to deal with).

In low light S9 smears a lot of details compared to P20 Pro or Pixel as you can tell by looking at the textures of the ground and plants lit by street lights. The colors are completely over the top too, and finally the flowers on the forground are turning to orange and it is really hard to separate them from the green stems.

@LoSPt1 I looked into sample 1 and 3, and although those are bad by S9+ standards, the P20P still doesn"t render any more detail than the S9+. Look into the foliage which is the hardest to sharpen due to the randomness of the data, you could see something in the S9+ samples whereas you couldn"t see anything (what"s left is even colored mush) in the P20P samples.

Note the fuzzy brush-stroke-like texture of the trees below the bridge and what seems like vines or moss on the slope to the lower left of the bridge in the P20P sample, and the extra detail of the S9+ in the corresponding locations...over character limit

To the right of the image you could see S9+ pushed shadows at the expense of more chroma noise, but anyhow the trees in the shadow still exhibit much more detail compared to the P20P which again renders them as thick brush strokes.

I have a suggestion for you. Why dont you go to the nearest store and try the cameras for yourself? I Dont see the smearing that they post in my pics (I only have a full HD 42" LCD) and I really dont look into the detail that much. But yes I sometimes do have the pictures printed out and to me they mostly look good. Now, in all honesty I havent shoot that much with the P20 Pro yet but the pics I did shoot look good to me.

I on the other hand advise you to make a few controlled side-by-side comparisons like Anandtech did with another latest generation flagship like the S9+ or Pixel2XL (but not the iPhones which still seem to be stuck with 1/3" sensors), then you"d more easily see what"s missing.

I do think DPR got a bad sample, GSMArena also has a studio scene and that one doesn"t have the ghosting/blurring (like slight motion blur, or astigmatism) issues, and I don"t get what I"m seeing in some of the base ISO samples, even at ISO32 the clouds show strange patchiness, I"ve never seen S9+ results so bad. Also in a low light scene, ISO50 with 1/4s shutter? I didn"t see that sort of behavior in other reviews either.

And with current phones you can easily print A4 - A5 size images or view full screen on phones and tablets without any noise or smudge being visible. Even relative low-light images. So yeah, they are not "real cameras" for "real lovers of picture taking" but are incredible good cameras for the rest of the world.

The Galaxy S9+ under test obviously had a defective tele camera.. no other reviewer has got such problems with the tele camera and of course everybody would return a defective phone like that instead of reviewing it considering it to be "normal". Anyway also from other comments I start to understand why DPR didn"t review previous Galaxy models..

barret8, most cell phone videos I see are shot vertical, and show way too much sky and ground. The fool ends up panning back and forth, when a horizontal framing would work best. When people tout their phone"s video capabilities and then capture all their awesome 4k video vertical. What do they do with the video, view it on their tiny phone? Is their computer screen or big 4k home TV hanging vertical? I guess they like seeing those huge black bars on the side.

I completely agree, that"s why I said "depending where are you going to view it". Viewing vertical movie on a TV screen is pointless. Sometimes, when you are viewing a video of, say, a person, full height, then vertical might be better as long as you are planning to view it on a handheld device. On a side note: if you are planning to view your movie on a huge 4K tv, then maybe phone is not the best tool to shoot ;)

So many so called "reviews" of phone cameras test low light performance by photographing static street scenes at night, which doesn"t represent real-world use. I"ve come away from such reviews believing the S9+ has great low light performance, but it has taken this review to highlight that this is at the cost of a slower shutter speed.

2) If the goods had been used and there have scratches or broken on face,then no warranty. Please be care of the flex, the broken flex may cause lcd or touch not working.