umi super lcd touch screen free sample

1.How many qualities can you offer?We can offer three kinds of quality for Original New,half original and chinese lcd.2.What"s difference of the qualities.

3.How can you offer a advantage price for good quality?We will give good price to new customer depend on the quality and quantity of the screen lcd.And we will give the

In keeping with their high-rotation flagship policy, UMi have updated their UMi Plus by adding an ‘Extreme’ model to the line up, the UMi Plus E. This model features a brand-new chipset and an insane 6GB of RAM! We’ve got a lot of time for UMi here at Review Hub Towers, and we’re very excited about getting our mitts on this phone, so without further ado let’s here are my UMi Plus E-xtreme Pros & Cons.

UMi clearly subscribe to the view that first impressions count, and the box that the UMi Plus E comes with is well thought out. A metal tin with a dark tinted plastic lid hints at the device inside, and removing the lid reveals the Plus E in all its glory.

Unlike a lot of other import phones, UMi have not included a screen protector or case with the Plus E. I did a little research and ordered the following case which came with a bundled screen protector, though bear in mind that tempered glass screen protectors don’t fit as snugly on 2.5d curved glass screens.

The screen on the Plus E is a 5.5 inch Full-HD Sharp LTPS display that clocks in at a well respected 401 pixels per inch (PPI). This 1080P resolution has become a standard resolution nowadays and is a testament to how much the quality level of import phones has improved.

I honestly don’t think phone screen resolution needs to be any better than this. Albeit the owners of established flagships get bragging rights with their 2k QHD screens, but I’d wager they’d happily trade their higher PPI for the boost to battery life that reverting to an FHD screen would provide.

The side bezels are relatively slim, and I’m pleased to report that they are representative of the true screen size – there are no sneaky ‘double bezels’ on the Plus E which I’m very happy with.

This is also the first phone I’ve come across with the NEG DinoRex T2X-1 glass strengthening. This is similar to the more well-known Gorilla or Dragontrail Glass and it’s good to see that UMi have opted for a recognised screen protection as opposed to some other import phones which don’t list the screen strengthening technology at all.

Make no mistake about it, the UMi Plus E has taken some of its design cues from some of the more popular smartphones out there. Owners of Apple and Samsung flagships would probably find one or two familiar design elements, and I think UMi have produced one of the best-looking import phones I’ve handled to date.

You won’t be agonising over which colour to get your UMi Plus E in, as it is only available in black, and while this does add to the aesthetic it is also definitely a bit of a fingerprint magnet.

Despite UMi reporting a 185g weight, I found this to be a little out as the Plus E registered 192g with SIM and micro SD removed. Taking the weight and also the 155mm height of the device into consideration this is at the top end of heftiness for phones in the 5.5 inch screen bracket.

UMi pulled off a bit of a coup and the Plus E is the first smartphone powered by the 8-core Helio P20. This is the next generation of upper-midrange CPUs from MediaTek, and is built using a 16nm fabrication process which should offer significant benefits to battery life compared to the outgoing P10 which uses the ancient 28nm process.

The Plus E did disappoint a little in the benchmark stakes however. As you can see in the tables below it lags significantly behind the Helio X20-powered Redmi Note 4, though it is a clear improvement on the UMi Super.

The most surprising aspect though is that the UMi Plus E with 6GB of LPDDR4 RAM scored 5005 on the Antutu RAM test, compared to the Redmi Note 4’s 3GB of LPDDR3 RAM which scored much higher with 7211. To me, something doesn’t quite add up.

As we have come to expect from UMi, the Plus E comes with a pretty much stock Android experience, currently Android Marshmallow version 6.0.1. The UMi Plus has already been upgraded to Android 7, however the story we’ve seen is that MediaTek have been slow in releasing the Android 7 source code for the new Helio P20 CPU, as such there is no word as yet for when the Plus E might be upgraded.

Like the UMi Super you can choose between on-screen or off-screen navigation buttons. The fingerprint scanner is also a physical ‘clickable’ home button, and there are unmarked areas to the left and right of this, the left being the ‘menu’ shortcut and right being ‘back’. This is further complicated by the home button also functioning as ‘back’ if you tap it lightly, and it will open the ‘recent apps’ when held down.

The on-screen buttons can be configured (and reordered) as home, back, menu or home, back, recent apps as per your preference. I would opt for the latter, as the menu shortcut feels somewhat redundant these days. However, the real gotcha here is that the off-screen buttons remain active even when the on-screen setup is selected. This is absolutely bonkers and I wish UMi would have disabled the 2 unmarked areas either side of the fingerprint scanner if the on-screen buttons were selected.

I’m please to say that the UMi Plus E performed the often-overlooked task of being a telephone very well. Calls were clear in both directions and the secondary mic did a good job of noise reduction.

When we review a phone, context is everything. Our expectations of a device that costs £50 are very different to those of a phone costing nearly £200, and they will be judged accordingly. I’m not going to sugar-coat it, the camera on the UMi Plus E was incredibly disappointing.

The UMi Plus E claims to be able to record in 4K but while this may be technically valid, video quality was also below par for the price-tag. Footage looked washed-out and the phone again struggled with changes in lighting. On the plus side, the audio quality of the videos is actually quite good.

Kudos to UMi for squeezing a very generous 4000 mAh battery into the Plus E. This means that you’d be very hard-pressed to run out of juice unless you regularly watch hours of video on your phone, and I found that I usually had over 50% battery life remaining by bedtime.

As with other UMi phones we’ve tested, the Plus E has full UK 4G connectivity as the 800 MHz/Band 20 frequency is supported. There are quite a few Chinese smartphone manufacturers who don’t include this, so the Plus E scores a few points here. The GPS worked well too, as it does with all Helio-powered phones, so MediaTek have made a lot of progress in this area.

The mid-range has become a bit of a battleground and there are lots of phones available that represent great value for money – the elephant in the room is the Redmi Note 4 which costs less than the UMi Plus E and beats it in a number of areas. Don’t let that put you off though, taken on its own merits the Plus E is definitely worthy of your consideration.

UMi have got a lot right with this phone. It looks fantastic, has full UK coverage, performs very well and offers a familiar Android experience. Conversely, there is little to fault, though the camera performs inexplicably poorly – so much so that getting what I’d consider to be an acceptable photo is very difficult indeed.

If you’re not too fussed about mobile pics then there is a lot to recommend here. UMi have hit upon a winning formula of releasing a flagship, then releasing a better version quite soon after, and have hit the target yet again with the Plus E.

Plus size, small price. Budget Chinese smartphones are looking and performing better every year. The UMI Plus is no exception at the cost of a larger form factor and subpar camera.

Budget smartphones are packing more power than ever and are well on their way to being as feature-heavy as pricier mainstream alternatives. The UMI Plus is such an example and is essentially the existing UMI Max with slightly upgraded hardware and features to justify the $20 USD higher price tag. Nonetheless, the Plus sounds like a bargain at just $170 USD with its mainstream Helio P10 SoC, large 5.5-inch 1080p display, high capacity 4000 mAh non-removable battery, and roomy 4 GB of LPDDR3 RAM.

Immediate competitors include the Oukitel U7 Plus and the ZTE Blade A452, but even these 5-inch smartphones are using lower resolution 720p screens compared to the FHD UMI. It"s not until the $200 to $300 USD range where smartphones begin carrying similar specifications to the UMI Plus such as the Huawei G8, Moto X Play, and Honor 5C.

Quality and materials include the aluminum housing on the back and the plastic strips along the top and bottom for optimal antenna reception. Its rounded edges and corners feel strong and rigid with no unintended gaps in between. The chrome-cut finish where the metal meets the 2.5D glass on front adds another touch to the iPhone-esque design. Attempting to twist the phone results in minimal warping and no audible creaking.

As for size and weight, the UMI Plus is slightly thicker, taller, and heavier than many existing 5.5-inch smartphones. The extra mass adds a more substantial feel to the smartphone without being too heavy, so this may work to its benefit. Otherwise, most 5.5-inch alternatives are smaller with higher screen-to-body ratios.

Internal eMMC 5.1 memory is 32 GB to be twice that of the UMI Max, though only 25 GB is available to the end-user after factoring in the OS. MicroSD cards are supported up to 256 GB and the slot is shared with the secondary Micro-SIM card.

According to UMI, both Micro-SIM slots support 4G LTE FDD up to 150 Mbps download (2600, 2100, 1800, 800 MHz frequencies). The two slots, however, cannot utilize 4G simultaneously as one will automatically be set to receive only. Here in the U.S., we were only able to connect to T-Mobile"s 3G network with no 4G bands supported. This is unfortunately quite common on Chinese smartphones designed more for international users.

WLAN is limited to 802.11n speeds with support for both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. Oddly enough, WLAN reception is weaker on the UMI compared to the LG G3 even when standing just two meters away from our EA8500 WLAN source. When moving about 15 meters away, however, reception becomes roughly the same on both smartphones.

The integrated GPS in the UMI is less accurate than on the LG G3 as shown by our GPS Test results below. We discovered similar results on the UMI Max as well, but the smartphone is nonetheless sufficient for general navigation while driving. More accurate solutions are recommended when off-road or on twisting trails.

The 5-point capacitive touchscreen responds quickly and reliably to scrolls and multi-touch gestures with no major latency issues. The edges and corners also respond swiftly to touch inputs without any "dead zones" or noticeable odd behavior.

The bottom Home button feels cheap to the touch. Travel is shallow and feedback is weak, so pressing down on it feels very uneven as a result. It"s fortunately touch-sensitive and simply tapping on its surface will bring you back to the Home screen. The adjacent Tabs and Back touch-sensitive buttons are also present in the same positioning as a Samsung smartphone (i.e., Tabs to the left and Back to the right), but there is no backlighting for either of them.

Touch ID for fingerprint unlocking works quickly, albeit not always reliably. The sensor recognizes a finger only most of the time and we recommend saving multiple entries of the same finger to reduce the chances of errors.

Subjectively, the edge-to-edge Gorilla Glass display offers a clean and crisp picture due to the dense FHD resolution. The screen itself is very close to the surface of the glass, so colors and pictures appear to "pop" to mimic the screens of costlier mainstream and flagship smartphones. Brightness levels and especially contrast levels are very high for a budget phone, although our measurements don"t show the screen to be nearly as bright as on the UMI Max and it is generally still dimmer than many mainstream competitors. The maximum brightness of the center of the screen can be as high as 462 nits when automatic brightness control is active. When automatic control is deactivated, the manual brightness limit becomes slightly lower at 433 nits. The Plus is slightly brighter on the bottom half of the screen compared to the top half.

Slight backlight bleeding can be observed on the top and bottom edges of the screen when displaying all black and on maximum brightness. This is hardly noticeable during everyday use and is not significant enough to be an issue.

Colors on the Plus are relatively accurate across all tested saturation levels despite having average grayscale and RGB balance. With that said, both colors are grayscale still appear to be slightly more accurate than on the UMI Max and even the Sony Xperia XZ whereas the costlier ZTE Axon 7 is far ahead.

ℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.↔ Response Time Black to White

Outdoor visibility is usable under shade and just average under sunlight. The wide viewing angles help in reducing the inevitable heavy glare from the glossy screen.

The UMI Plus uses the same Helio P10 MT6755 SoC as many other mainstream smartphones including the HTC Desire 10 Pro, Blackview R7, and the Sony Xperia XA. It also carries more RAM than the immediate competition at 4 GB compared to 2 to 3 GB on the Honor 5C and even the similar UMI Max. Raw processor performance according to 3DMark Ice Storm Physics is about 30 to 40 percent slower than the flagship Snapdragon 820 found on many flagship smartphones.

Subjectively, system performance is very fast with only minor latency and hiccups when multi-tasking between heavy applications like games. The Android Marshmallow experience feels pure even though the smartphone uses an UMI-specific UI since the overlay stays close to the vanilla Android visual style.

3D titles including Asphalt 8 and N.O.V.A. 3 play without any major issues on the UMI Plus. Raw graphics performance from the integrated Mali-T860 MP2 is about 6x to 7x slower than the new Qualcomm Adreno 530 as found on the Google Pixel XL and the ZTE Axon 7 according to 3DMark Sling Shot. This puts the UMI Plus in the same ballpark as the mainstream Adreno 506 as found on the ZenFone 3 ZE552KL and ZTE Axon 7 Max.

Surface temperatures are warmer on the top half compared to the bottom as is common on many smartphones due to the positioning of the internal battery. As a result, the phone will feel very warm when held up to the ear after a gaming or browsing session.We were able to record a surface temperature of over 46 C at its worst when under extreme loads with the front of the device being noticeably warmer than the back. Our UMI Plus also runs warmer than our UMI Max, which correlates to our higher power demands of the Plus as shown in our Power Consumption section below.

UMI advertises "clean and powerful" Hi-Fi audio from the integrated speakerphone. In reality, however, sound quality is poor and extremely narrow in range as shown by our microphone measurements below. Music playback is very high-pitched and unnatural since bass frequencies are poorly reproduced and is almost non-existent. The pricier Phab 2 Pro, for example, outputs a wider frequency range down to the 250 Hz range in a direct comparison.

dB(A)0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.634.32534.834.83133.731.24033.931.95033.3326331.333.28032.234.410029.729.712530.629.716027.431.520026.829.92502629.631524.833.240023.940.550023.446.763022.752.880022.459.4100022.664.212502267.9160021.766.5200021.567.1250021.272.9315021.173.9400020.977.3500020.978.863002172.680002162.61000021.2581250021521600021.243.3SPL3484.4N2.249.2median 22median 58Delta1.813.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide medianshow medianPink NoiseUMI PlusApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz

The UMI Plus appears to be more demanding than the UMI Max even after double-checking our measurements. Idling on the Home screen will draw about 2 to 3 Watts while running StabilityTest Classic will demand almost 8 Watts. Running the more demanding StabilityTest CPU+GPU benchmark will throttle the performance of the Plus down to almost 5 Watts.

Like on the UMI Max, users can expect over 9 hours of constant WLAN use on a brightness level setting of about 40 percent (150 nits). High loads on maximum display brightness will last for just under 5 hours.

UMI has created a solid smartphone with impressive specifications for under $200 USD. It performs as smoothly as one would expect from a costlier mainstream smartphone without cutting popular features like the fingerprint reader, MicroSD card, or even the USB Type-C port. Wrap everything into a relatively sturdy design and you have a smartphone that"s hard to beat for the price.

Like most budget devices, however, the devil is in the details. Its dimensions are large even for a 5.5-inch smartphone and its rear camera quality is more representative of the budget category. Speakerphone quality is poor and all of its buttons could have benefited from stronger feedback when pressed. Call reception is also a mixed bag in our particular test area and 4G may not be available for North American users. The vibrate setting is weak and its GPS is only average in terms of accuracy.If the list of drawbacks aren"t a concern for day-to-day use, then owners should be satisfied with the core hardware performance and general quality of the UMI Plus.

realme launched the realme 6 Pro smartphone, successor to last year’s realme 5 Pro, which became popular after the price cut few months back. This has improvements in almost all the departments compared to the predecessor, right from the 90Hz refresh rate screen, 64MP rear camera with a new telephoto lens, dual front cameras, slightly bigger battery with 30W fast charging and lots more. Specs look good on paper, but is the phone worth the price of Rs. 16,999 when you already have the realme X2? Let us dive into the review to find out.

The realme 6 Pro has a 6.6-inch Full HD+ LCD punch-hole screen with a pixel resolution of 2400 × 1080 pixels, 20:9 aspect ratio 2.5D curved glass screen with gentle rounded corners and pixel density of about 398PPI.

The main highlight of the phone is the 90Hz refresh rate, which can be adjusted to always on 90Hz or choose auto select option to automatically let it select the best refresh rate based on the app. The display is bright, thanks to 400 nits (maximum 480 nits) and the colors are vibrant, thanks to 81.5% NTSC color gamut. Sunlight legibility is good as well. The phone as ultra-narrow border and the narrow bottom bar so it has high screen-to-body ratio of about 85%, even though the company says it is 90.6%. It also has HDR support, which works for supported YouTube videos, but you can’t control it manually. The phone has Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection as well.

Since this has a 20:9 aspect ratio screen, you can pinch to zoom to fill the screen when you use video apps, but the content is cropped. Under the display options there are two options to adjust colors and contrast based on your preference. There is also eye care mode that lets you reduce the display’s blue light emission so it doesn’t cause eye strain when you are reading at night. There is Dark mode as well, which can be scheduled or choose it from sunset to sunrise. You can also choose dark theme for third-party apps that lack the feature, but it is not perfect to view the content. Since the phone doesn’t have an AMOLED screen, you don’t have always on lockscreen features.

Above the display there is an earpiece on the top edge along with the proximity sensor. The ambient light sensor is present under the screen. It also has a gyroscope and a magnetic sensor, otherwise known as a magnetometer. There is also a 16-megapixel camera on the front and a secondary 8MP 105° ultra-wide sensor.

On the back there is a 64-megapixel camera along with an 8-megapixel 120-degree wide-angle lens, 12-megapixel telephoto lens and a 2-megapixel macro camera.  This has slight camera bump due to the large sensor, but the camera lens is protected by a scratch-resistant glass. Even though the phone has a large screen, it is compact to hold. This has a 3D glass design and uses UV-curing offset printing technology. Hundreds of re-adjustments have been carried out to finally achieve the realme 6 Pro chic lightning pattern design with its rich layers and elegant texture, says the company. It also has Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. This definitely looks premium to look and hold. The phone comes bundled with a clear protective case in the box which is good. Since it has a glass back, it is recommended to use a case.

It runs Android 10 out of the box with realmeUI on top with Android security update for February, 2020. It has a lot of features such as new UI, Customizable Icon Style, Animated Wallpapers, Focus Mode, Screen Recording with Internal Audio Recording, Smart Sidebar, and more. You can check them out here.

Coming to the battery life, the 4300mAh built-in battery offers brilliant battery life. It lasts for a day even with heavy use and over two days with average use, and I got about 6 hours and 25 minutes of screen on time (SOT) during my use even when 90Hz refresh rate is enabled, so it should be more with 60Hz. Since the phone has support VOOC Flash charge, it takes just 1 hour to charge it from 0 to 100%, and 0 to 50% takes 23 minutes with the bundled 30W charger. With the 20W VOOC 3.0 charger it takes 1 and half hours for 0 to 100%.

Last year’s realme 5 Pro was a value-for-money (VFM) phone, and it even got better after the price cut, however the realme 6 Pro that starts at Rs. 16999, which is slightly costly. 90Hz is a good thing, and the phone offers brilliant battery life along with 30W charger in the box, which is a good deal, but the company’s own realme X2 with an AMOLED screen and Snapdragon 730G is available for the same price. There are also several other competing smartphones for the same price. Wish the phone was slightly cheaper.

As mentioned before, the realme X2 is another good choice. Another option is the POCO X2POCO X2 with an 120Hz refresh rate screen at a cheaper rate, but it doesn’t have a telephoto lens. If you spend a bit more there is Redmi K20 with the Snapdragon 730, telephoto lens for 2x zoom and a no-notch display.